Cover not available
Review published In:
Identifying sentences in signed languages
Edited by Onno A. Crasborn
[Sign Language & Linguistics 10:2] 2007
► pp. 223–231
Book review

Raum als kommunikative Ressource — eine handlungstheoretische Analyse visueller Sprachen

[Space as a communicative resource — a functional-pragmatic approach to visual languages]

Reviewed by
| University of Hamburg
Published online: 1 October 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.10.2.10wro
References (14)
References
Bühler, Karl. [1934], 1999 3. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Lucius und Lucius.Google Scholar
Cogill-Koez, Dorothea. 2000. Signed language classifier predicates: Linguistic structures or schematic visual representation? Sign Language & Linguistics 3(2), 153–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeMatteo, Asa. 1977. Visual imagery and visual analogues in American Sign Language. In L. A. Friedman (ed.), On the other hand, 109–137. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad. 1979. Verwendungen der Deixis beim sprachlichen Handeln. Linguistisch-philologische Untersuchungen zum hebräischen deiktischen System. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen. 1996. The confluence of space and language in signed languages. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. F. Garrett (eds.), Language and space, 171–211. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 3. The exact number of parameters can be disregarded for this argument.Google Scholar
. 2002. Language, cognition and the brain. Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language. The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lynn Alice. 1975. Space, time and person reference in American Sign Language. Language 511, 940–961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillenmeyer, Margit. 1996 3. DGS. Deutsche Gebärdensprache III. Aufbaukurs für Fortgeschrittene 2. Bayern. München: Margit Hillenmeyer.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1995. Real, surrogate and token space: Grammatical consequences in ASL. In K. Emmorey & J. S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture and space, 19–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1996. Spatial representations in discourse: Comparing spoken and signed languages. Lingua 981, 145–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mally, Gertrud. 1993. Redewendungen in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. Münchner Dialekt. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark. 1977. Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In L. A. Friedman (ed.), On the other hand, 57–109. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Redder, Angelika. 1998. Sprachwissen als handlungspraktisches Bewusstsein  – eine funktional-pragmatische Diskussion. Didaktik Deutsch 51, 60–75.Google Scholar