Article published in:
Sign Language Syntax from a Formal Perspective: Selected Papers from the 2012 Warsaw FEASTEdited by Paweł Rutkowski
[Sign Language & Linguistics 16:2] 2013
► pp. 157–188
wh-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS)
Chiara Branchini | Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia
Anna Cardinaletti | Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Carlo Cecchetto | Sapienza Università di Roma
Caterina Donati | Institut Jean-Nicod CNRS Paris
This paper focuses on those wh-questions in Italian Sign Language (LIS) featuring two lexically identical wh-signs. We show that wh1 (the first wh in linear order) is shorter than wh2 (the second wh in liner order). However, there is evidence that this different duration is due to a phrase-final lengthening, as wh2 occupies a sentence-final position. We therefore conclude that the two wh-signs are identical full copies: one sitting in Spec,CP on the right in LIS and the other one sitting in Spec,FocP on the left. We show that this construction yields a (focused) cleft question interpretation and we speculate that both copies are phonologically realized because the wh-signs in Spec,CP and Spec,FocP are the heads of two distinct chains. Finally, we distinguish identical wh-duplication from improper wh-duplication, namely cases where one of the two wh-elements is what we call qartichoke, an underspecified interrogative sign only surfacing in wh-questions.
Keywords: sign language, Italian Sign Language (LIS), doubling, cleft questions, wh-questions, copy theory of traces
Published online: 12 December 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.16.2.03bra
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.16.2.03bra
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer
Cardinaletti, Anna
Hu, Shenai, Carlo Cecchetto & Maria Teresa Guasti
HU, SHENAI, ANNA GAVARRÓ & MARIA TERESA GUASTI
Mantovan, Lara & Carlo Geraci
MANTOVAN, LARA, CARLO GERACI & ANNA CARDINALETTI
Mantovan, Lara, Beatrice Giustolisi & Francesca Panzeri
Notarrigo, Ingrid & Laurence Meurant
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.