Cover not available
Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 17:1 (2014) ► pp.20–55

Non-native or native vocabulary in Mexican Sign Language

| Summer Institute of Linguistics

This paper discusses lexicalized fingerspelling and initialization in Mexican Sign Language (LSM). It analyzes various phonological restructuring processes that take place when fingerspelled words become lexicalized and it argues that these lexicalized signs are part of the foreign/non-native lexicon of LSM, based on a model by Brentari and Padden (2001). As far as initialization, which is extremely common in LSM, is concerned, this article describes variation in the use of initialization by different signers of LSM, and the various lexical families based on initialization that exist in LSM. It also argues that, unlike lexicalized fingerspelling and unlike initialized signs in ASL, initialized signs are part of the core vocabulary of LSM, because they behave like native signs both phonologically and morphologically. To conclude, the morphological structure of initialized signs is discussed.

Keywords: foreign lexicon, lexical families, lexicalization, initialization, native lexicon, Mexican Sign Language, fingerspelling
Published online: 6 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.17.1.02hen
References
Akamatsu, Tane.
1982 The acquisition of fingerspelling in pre-school children. PhD dissertation, The University of Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
Battison, Robbin.
1978 Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Bickford, Albert.
1991 Lexical variation in Mexican Sign Language: One language or many? Sign Language Studies 721. 241-276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane.
1990 Licensing in ASL handshape change. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues, 57-68. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane
1998, A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane.
2001 Introduction. Borrowed elements in sign languages: A window on word formation. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages, ix-xx. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Carol Padden.
2001 Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages, 87-119. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulter, Geoffrey.
1982 On the nature of ASL as a monosyllabic language. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistics Society of America , San Diego, California.
Cruz Aldrete, Miroslava.
2008 Gramática de la Lengua de Señas Mexicana. PhD dissertation, El Colegio de México, México D. F.Google Scholar
Faurot, Karla, Dianne Dellinger, Andy Eatough & Steven Parkhurst.
1999 The identity of Mexican Sign as a language. SIL Electronic Survey Reports, no. 2000–002.
Fernald, Theodore B. & Donna J. Napoli.
2000 Exploitation of morphological possibilities in signed languages: Comparison of American Sign Language with English. Sign Language and Linguistics 31. 3-58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, Erich.
2009 Meemul tziij: An indigenous sign language complex of Mesoamerica. Sign Language Studies 91. 324-366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fridman Mintz, Boris.
2005 Tense and aspect inflections in Mexican Sign Language verbs. PhD dissertation, University of Georgetown, Washington, DC [published in 2010, Lambert Academic Publishing].Google Scholar
García Lanz, Hortensia, Gloria Arango Mejía & Donna Jackson Maldonado.
1983 Mis primeras señas: una introducción al lenguaje manual. México D. F.: Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
Guerra Currie, Anne-Marie, Richard Meier & Keith Walters.
2002 A cross-linguistic examination of the lexicons of four signed languages. In Richard Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 224-236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, Bernadet.
Forthcoming. Kinship and colour terms in Mexican Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan & Keiko Sagara (eds.), Semantic domains in sign languages: Number, colour and kinship. Berlin/Nijmegen: Mouton de Gruyter/Ishara Press. DOI logo
Johnson, Robert E.
1991 Sign language, culture & community in a traditional Yucatec Maya village. Sign Language Studies 731. 461-474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri.
1999 On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language and Linguistics 21. 373-418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jullian Montañez, Christian G.
2001 Génesis de la comunidad silente en México. Licentiate thesis, UNAM, México D. F.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi.
1979 The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K.
2003 Grammar, gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López García, Luis A., Rosa M. Rodríguez Cervantes, María G. Zamora Martínez & Susana San Esteban Sosa.
2006 Mis manos que hablan. México D. F.: Editorial Trillas.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J.
1981 A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 121. 373-418.Google Scholar
Miranda, Juan C.
1997 Lengua de Señas de México. México D. F.: Asociación Mexicana de Sordos.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol.
1998 The ASL lexicon. Sign Language and Linguistics 11. 39-60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David.
1992 Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 231. 407-442.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Claire & David Quinto-Pozos
2010 Transmission of sign languages in Latin America. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages. A Cambridge language survey, 46–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy.
1990 Temporal aspects and ASL phonology. In Susan Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol.1: Linguistics, 7-36. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Secretaría de Servicios Educativos para el Distrito Federal
2004 Diccionario Español – Lengua de Señas Mexicana. DIELSEME. México D. F.: Secretaría de Educación Pública. (Volume in compact disk ISBN 970-18-8538-4).Google Scholar
Serafín García, María E.
1990 Comunicación manual, Tomo I. México D. F.: Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
1991 Comunicación manual, Tomo II. México D. F.: Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
Serafín de Fleischmann, María E.
2011 Diccionario de Lenguaje Mexicano de Señas. México D. F.: Editorial Trillas.Google Scholar
Shuman, Malcolm K.
1980 The sound of silence in Nohyah: A preliminary account of sign language use by the deaf in a Maya community in Yucatan, Mexico. Language Sciences 21. 144-173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shuman, Malcolm K. & Mary M. Shuman.
1981 A brief annotated sign list of Yucatec Maya Sign Language. Language Sciences 31. 124-185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith Stark, Thomas.
1986 La Lengua Manual Mexicana. Unpublished manuscript, El Colegio de México, México D. F.Google Scholar
Valli, Clayton & Ceil Lucas.
1995 Linguistics of American Sign Language: An introduction, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, James.
1978 Historical bases of American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 333-348. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Morfín-Chávez, Ricardo Fernando, Jesús Javier Gortarez-Pelayo & Irvin Hussein Lopez-Nava
2024. Fingerspelling Recognition in Mexican Sign Language (LSM) Using Machine Learning. In Advances in Computational Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14391], ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Naranjo-Zeledón, Luis, Mario Chacón-Rivas, Jesús Peral & Antonio Ferrández
2020. Phonological Proximity in Costa Rican Sign Language. Electronics 9:8 ► pp. 1302 ff. DOI logo
Zeshan, Ulrike & Sibaji Panda
2018. Sign-speaking: The structure of simultaneous bimodal utterances . Applied Linguistics Review 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.