Article published in:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 17:2 (2014) ► pp. 215238
References
Anderson, Stephen R
1981Why phonology isn’t “natural”. Linguistic Inquiry 121. 493–539.Google Scholar
Battison, Robbin
1978Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Blees, Marja, Onno Crasborn, Harry van der Hulst & Els van der Kooij
1996SignPhon: A database tool for phonological analysis of sign languages. Manual, version 0.1. Manuscript, Leiden University.Google Scholar
De Ruiter, Jan Peter
1998The production of gesture and speech. PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
1993Space in Danish Sign Language. The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Gijn, Ingeborg van
1997Vormkarakteristieken van gestures en gebaren [Form characteristics of gestures and signs]. MA thesis, Leiden University.
Hulst, Harry van der
1993Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 101. 209–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996On the other hand. Lingua 981. 121–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1972Some relationships between body motion and speech. In Aron Siegman & Benjamin Pope (eds.), Studies in dyadic communication, 177–210. New York: Pergamon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988aSign languages of Aboriginal Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988bHow gesture can become like words. In Fernando Poyatos (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, 131–141. Toronto: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro
1993Language and thought: A study of spontaneous gestures and Japanese mimetics. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
Kita, Sotaro, Ingeborg van Gijn & Harry van der Hulst
1998Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In Ipke Wachsmuth & Martin Fröhlich (eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction, International Gesture Workshop Bielefeld, Germany, September 17-19, 1997, Proceedings ( Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol. 13171), 23–35. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Krauss, Robert M., Yihsiu Chen & Purnima Chawala
1996Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication: What do conversational hand gestures tell us? In Mark Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 389–450. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, Mark
1979Natural constraints in sign language phonology: Data from anatomy. Sign Language Studies 241. 215–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David
1985So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review 921. 350–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Prillwitz, Siegmund, Regina Leven, Heiko Zienert, Thomas Hanke & Jan Henning
1989HamNoSys. Hamburg notation system for sign languages: An introductory guide. Version 2.0. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Reddy, Michael
1979The conduit metaphor – a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
1989Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in ASL phonology. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Hand in hand: The roles of the nondominant hand in sign language phonology. The Linguistic Review 101. 337–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll
1999The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Brentari, Diane
2019.  In Sign Language Phonology, Crossref logo
Cooperrider, Kensy, Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2016. Spatial analogies pervade complex relational reasoning: Evidence from spontaneous gestures. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 1:1 Crossref logo
Mertz, Justine, Chiara Annucci, Valentina Aristodemo, Beatrice Giustolisi, Doriane Gras, Giuseppina Turco, Carlo Geraci & Caterina Donati
2022. Measuring sign complexity: Comparing a model-driven and an error-driven approach. Laboratory Phonology 24:1 Crossref logo
Ortega, Gerardo & Aslı Özyürek
2020. Systematic mappings between semantic categories and types of iconic representations in the manual modality: A normed database of silent gesture. Behavior Research Methods 52:1  pp. 51 ff. Crossref logo
Sandler, Wendy
2018. The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.