Article published in:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 18:2 (2015) ► pp. 238250
References
Chikobava, Arnold
1950Kartuli enis zogadi daxasiateba [A general characterization of the Georgian language]. KEGL, vol. I1, Tbilisi. Ed. by A. Chikobava. Tbilisi: Sakartvelos mecnierebata gamocemebi. 018–080.Google Scholar
Deeters, Gerhard
1930Das Kharthwelische Verbum. Vergleichende Darstellung des Verbalbaus der südkaukasischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Markert & Petters.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kavtaradze, Ivane
1954Zmnis žiritadi k’at’egoreibisatvis žvel kartulši [Concerning the general verbal categories in Old Georgian]. Tbilisi.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard Meier
2011On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign language. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 95–141.Google Scholar
Makharoblidze, Tamar
2012Kartuli jest’uri ena [Georgian Sign Language]. Tbilisi: Ministry of Education and Science, USAID, Save the Children International. Google Scholar
Mathur, Gaurav & Christian Rathmann
2012Verb agreement. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 136–157. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit
2002A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 201. 413–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol
1988Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2013person climbing up a tree (and other adventures in sign language grammaticalization). Sign Language & Linguistics 16(2). 189–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quer, Josep
2011When agreeing to disagree is not enough: Further arguments for the linguistic status of sign language agreement. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3-4). 189–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quer, Josep & Santiago Frigola
2006Crosslinguistic research and particular grammars: A case study on auxiliary predicates in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Paper presented at Workshop on cross-linguistic sign language research, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, January 2006.
Sapountzaki, Galini
2012Agreement auxiliaries. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 204–227. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2005Free functional elements of tense, aspect, modality and agreement as possible auxiliaries in Greek Sign Language. Bristol: University of Bristol dissertation.Google Scholar
Shanidze, Akaki
1926Kartulizmnissakcevi [Version of Georgian verb]. TSU Moambe. Vol. VI1. (With an abstract in French – Versions du verbe Géorgien). Tbilisi. 312–333.Google Scholar
1980 [1953]Txzulebani tormet’ t’omad. t’omi III. kartuli enis gramatik’is sapužvlebi. Morpologia. [Works in 12 volumes. Vol III1. Basics of Georgian Grammar. Morphology].Tbilisi: TSU Press.Google Scholar
Steinbach, Markus
2011What do agreement auxiliaries reveal about the grammar of sign language agreement. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 209–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinbach, Markus & Roland Pfau
2007Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign languages. In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Cross-linguistic studies on sign language structure, 303–339. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B
2013The point of agreement: Changing how we think about sign language, gesture, and agreement. Sign Language & Linguistics 16(2). 221–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 21 other publications

No author info given
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, Crossref logo
Baker, Anne
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Baker, Anne & Roland Pfau
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 93 ff. Crossref logo
Baker, Anne, Trude Schermer, Roland Pfau & Beppie van den Bogaerde
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. xiii ff. Crossref logo
Baker, Anne & Beppie van den Bogaerde
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Baker, Anne, Beppie van den Bogaerde & Sonja Jansma
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 51 ff. Crossref logo
Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, Crossref logo
Börstell, Carl
2019. Differential object marking in sign languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 Crossref logo
Crasborn, Onno A.
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Crasborn, Onno A.
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Kimmelman, Vadim
2018. Basic argument structure in Russian Sign Language. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 Crossref logo
Makharoblidze, Tamar & Roland Pfau
2018. A negation-tense interaction in Georgian Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 21:1  pp. 137 ff. Crossref logo
Pfau, Roland
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 149 ff. Crossref logo
Pfau, Roland
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 197 ff. Crossref logo
Pfau, Roland & Heleen Bos
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Schermer, Trude
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Schermer, Trude
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 279 ff. Crossref logo
Schermer, Trude & Roland Pfau
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 25 ff. Crossref logo
Schermer, Trude & Roland Pfau
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 299 ff. Crossref logo
van den Bogaerde, Beppie, Marjolein Buré & Connie Fortgens
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 325 ff. Crossref logo
van der Kooij, Els
2016.  In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,  pp. 251 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.