Cover not available
Article published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 22:1 (2019) ► pp.44–82

General use coordination in Japanese and Japanese Sign Language

| Showa Women’s University

Davidson (2013) shows that in American Sign Language (ASL), conjunction and disjunction can be expressed by the same general use coordinator (cf. mary drink tea coord coffee ‘Mary drank tea and coffee; Mary drank tea or coffee.’). To derive these two meanings, she proposes an alternative semantic analysis whereby the two interpretations arise through universal or existential quantification over a set of alternatives licensed by (non-)linguistic cues, such as contexts and prosodic or lexical material. This paper provides supportive evidence for Davidson’s analysis from two other languages, Japanese and Japanese Sign Language. These languages are shown to employ general use coordination similar to that in ASL, but the general use coordinators in the three languages differ in one important respect: the locality of lexical elements that induce a disjunctive meaning. It is suggested that this cross-linguistic variation can be attributed to language-specific properties that concern the Q-particle discussed in Uegaki (2014, 2018).

Keywords: coordination, conjunction, disjunction, Q-particle, American Sign Language, Japanese, Japanese Sign Language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Davidson (2013)
  • 3.General use coordination in Japanese
  • 4.General use coordination in Japanese Sign Language
  • 5.Cross-linguistic differences in general use coordination
  • 6.How to accommodate the cross-linguistic variation
    • 6.1Disjunction in Japanese
    • 6.2Disjunction in JSL
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 9 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18003.asa
References
Asada, Yuko
2014 On the nature of the repetitive coordinator -to in Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu 1451. 97–109.Google Scholar
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis
2006 Disjunction in alternative semantics. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid & Shin-Sook Kim
2006 Intervention effects in alternative questions. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 91. 165–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Margit
2014 Conjunction and disjunction in a language without ‘and’. In Todd Snider, Sarah D’Antonio & Mia Weigand (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 24, 137–155. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Cable, Seth
2010 The grammar of Q: Q-particles, wh-movement, and pied-piping. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen
2008 The interpretation of disjunction in Universal Grammar. Language and Speech 51(1–2). 151–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Kate
2013 ‘And’ or ‘or’: General use coordination in ASL. Semantics & Pragmatics 6(4). 1–44.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2006 Either-float and the syntax of co-or-dination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 241. 689–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susan & Qunhu Gong
2011 Variation in East Asian sign language structures. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 499–518. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki
1986 A theory of category projection and its applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Goro, Takuya & Sachie Akiba
2004 The acquisition of disjunction and positive polarity in Japanese. In Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), 251–264. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hagstrom, Paul
1998 Decomposing questions. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. L.
1973 Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10(1). 41–53.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-Hye & Maribel Romero
2004 The syntax of whether/Q… or questions: Ellipsis combined with movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 221. 527–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken & Shinichiro Ishihara
2012 Syntactic metamorphosis: Clefts, sluicing, and in-situ focus in Japanese. Syntax 15(2). 142–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoji, Hajime
1990 Theories of anaphora and aspects of Japanese syntax. Unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Ichida, Yasuhiro
1998 Nihon shuwa no bunpoo [The grammar of Japanese Sign Language]. Gekkan Gengo 27(4). 44–51. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Kimura, Harumi
2007 Nihon shuwa to roo bunka: Roosha wa stranger [Japanese Sign Language and Deaf culture: Deaf is a stranger]. Tokyo: Seikatsushoin.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, Hideki
1992 LF pied piping: Evidence from Sinhala. Gengo Kenkyu 1021. 46–87.Google Scholar
Kotani, Katsunori
2009 Nihon shuwa-ni okeru tooi-koozoo [Coordinate structures in Japanese Sign Language]. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of Japanese Association for Sign Language Studies. 33–36. The University of Tokyo, Tokyo.
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1965 Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
1988 Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Lingvisticae Investigationes 121. 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott
2003 Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitrovič, Moreno & Uli Sauerland
2014 Decomposing coordination. In Jyoti Iyer & Leland Kusmer (eds.), Proceedings of the 44th North East Linguistic Society (NELS), 39–52. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Morgan, Michael W.
2006 Interrogatives and negatives in Japanese Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 91–127. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Nicolae, Andreea Cristina
2013 Any questions?: Polarity as a window into the structure of questions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio
2004 Coordination in mentalese. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 41–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oka, Norie & Hitomi Akahori
(eds.) 2011 Bunpoo ga kisokara wakaru nihon shuwa no sikumi [The structure of Japanese Sign Language: Understanding the grammar from the basics]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin
1997  Wh-movement and the position of Spec CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language 731. 18–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podlesny, Olivia
2015 Investigating disjunction in American Sign Language: The importance of nonmanual signals and the influence of English. Carleton, Canada: Carleton University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Roelofsen, Floris & Sam van Gool
2010 Disjunctive questions, intonation, and highlighting. In Maria Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager & Katrin Schulz (eds.), Selected Papers from the 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, 365–374. ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Singh, Raj, Ken Wexler, Andrea Astle, Deepthi Kamawar & Danny Fox
2013 Children interpret disjunction as conjunction: Consequences for the theory of scalar implicature. Unpublished manuscript, Carleton University.Google Scholar
2016 Children interpret disjunction as conjunction: Consequences for theories of implicature and child development. Natural Language Semantics 24(4). 305–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slade, Benjamin
2011 Formal and philological inquiries into the nature of interrogatives, indefinites, disjunction, and focus in Sinhala and other languages. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Smith, Ryan Walter & Ryoichiroo Kobayashi
2017 Focusing on coordination: The case of Japanese -toka and -tari . In Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine (ed.), Proceedings of GLOW in Asia XI–Volume II (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 85), 205–215. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
2002 Hungarian disjunctions and positive polarity. In Istvan Kenesei & Peter Siptar (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 81, 217–241. The University of Szeged.Google Scholar
2004 Positive polarity – negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 221. 409–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uchibori, Asako & Kazumi Matsuoka
2013 Some observations on wh-clauses in Japanese Sign Language. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 291. 17–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Split movement of wh-elements in Japanese Sign Language: A preliminary study. Lingua 1831. 107–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uegaki, Wataru
2014 Cross-linguistic variation in the derivation of alternative questions: Japanese and beyond. In Luka Crnič & Uli Sauerland (eds.), The art and craft of semantics: A festschrift for Irene Heim, 251–274. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
2018 A unified semantics for the Japanese Q-particle “ka” in indefinites, questions and disjunctions. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3(1). 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hartmann, Katharina, Roland Pfau & Iris Legeland
2021. Asymmetry and Contrast: Coordination in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 35:1 DOI logo
Rodrigues, Angélica & Roland Pfau
2023. Language Prejudice and Language Structure: On Missing and Emerging Conjunctions in Libras and Other Sign Languages. In Understanding Linguistic Prejudice, ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.