Article published In:
Sign Language & LinguisticsVol. 2:2 (1999) ► pp.115–185
On Defining Lexeme in a Signed Language
In this paper we attempt to define the notion of ‘lexeme’ in relation to signed languages. We begin by defining signs as a distinct kind of visual-gestural communicative act, different from other communicative uses of gesture. This is followed by a discussion of the most important categories of productive forms in signed languages, referred to simply as signs. The close relationship between the formational aspects of these signs and their meaning is also discussed and exemplified. We then describe the criteria for recognizing lexemes as a subset of signs, and distinguishing variant and modified forms. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications the notion of lexeme has for our understanding of the lexicon of signed languages and for signed language lexicography.
Cited by
Cited by 87 other publications
Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer
Bauer, Anastasia & Masha Kyuseva
2022. New Insights Into Mouthings: Evidence From a Corpus-Based Study of Russian Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 12 
Baus, Cristina, Eva Gutiérrez & Manuel Carreiras
2014. The role of syllables in sign language production. Frontiers in Psychology 5
Baus, Cristina, Eva Gutiérrez-Sigut, Josep Quer & Manuel Carreiras
2008. Lexical access in Catalan Signed Language (LSC) production. Cognition 108:3 ► pp. 856 ff.
Beukeleers, Inez & Myriam Vermeerbergen
2022. Show Me What You’ve B/Seen: A Brief History of Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 13
BOUCHARD, DENIS, COLETTE DUBUISSON & ANNE-MARIE PARISOT
2005. CATEGORIES IN QUEBEC SIGN LANGUAGE: REFLECTIONS ON CATEGORIZATION ACROSS MODALITIES. In Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, ► pp. 381 ff.
Brentari, Diane
2019. Sign Language Phonology,
Börstell, Carl, Thomas Hörberg & Robert Östling
2016. Distribution and duration of signs and parts of speech in Swedish Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Börstell, Carl, Ryan Lepic & Gal Belsitzman
2016. Articulatory plurality is a property of lexical plurals in sign language.
Lingvisticae Investigationes
39:2 ► pp. 391 ff.
Capirci, Olga, Chiara Bonsignori & Alessio Di Renzo
2022. Signed Languages: A Triangular Semiotic Dimension. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Chen, Yaqing & Qunhu Gong
2020. Dialects or languages: A corpus-based quantitative approach to lexical variation in common signs in Chinese Sign Language (CSL). Lingua 248 ► pp. 102944 ff.
Cohen-Koka, Shirit, Bracha Nir & Irit Meir
2022. Linguistic Variation, Discourse Analysis, and Deaf Education: Case Studies from ISL. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 28:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
Cohen-Koka, Shirit, Bracha Nir & Irit Meir
2023. Variation of sign parameters in narrative and expository discourse. Sign Language & Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 218 ff.
Cormier, K., S. Smith & Z. Sevcikova
2013. Predicate Structures, Gesture, and Simultaneity in the Representation of Action in British Sign Language: Evidence From Deaf Children and Adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 18:3 ► pp. 370 ff.
Cormier, Kearsy, David Quinto-Pozos, Zed Sevcikova & Adam Schembri
2012. Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language & Communication 32:4 ► pp. 329 ff.
de Lint, Vanja
2020. From meaning to form and back in American Sign Language verbal classifier morphemes. Word Structure 13:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Demey, Eline & Els van der Kooij
2008. Phonological patterns in a dependency model: Allophonic relations grounded in phonetic and iconic motivation. Lingua 118:8 ► pp. 1109 ff.
Eccarius, Petra & Diane Brentari
2007. Symmetry and dominance: A cross-linguistic study of signs and classifier constructions. Lingua 117:7 ► pp. 1169 ff.
Fenlon, Jordan, Adam Schembri, Trevor Johnston & Kearsy Cormier
2015. Documentary and Corpus Approaches to Sign Language Research. In Research Methods in Sign Language Studies, ► pp. 156 ff.
Ferrara, Lindsay, Benjamin Anible, Gabrielle Hodge, Tommi Jantunen, Lorraine Leeson, Johanna Mesch & Anna-Lena Nilsson
2023. A cross-linguistic comparison of reference across five signed languages. Linguistic Typology 27:3 ► pp. 591 ff.
Ferrara, Lindsay & Rolf Piene Halvorsen
2017. Depicting and describing meanings with iconic signs in Norwegian Sign Language. Gesture 16:3 ► pp. 371 ff.
Ferrara, Lindsay & Trevor Johnston
2014. Elaborating Who's What: A Study of Constructed Action and Clause Structure in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Ferrara, Lindsay & Anna-Lena Nilsson
2017. Describing spatial layouts as an L2M2 signed language learner. Sign Language & Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Ferrara, Lindsay & Torill Ringsø
2019. Spatial Vantage Points in Norwegian Sign Language. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 583 ff.
Fox, Neil, Bencie Woll & Kearsy Cormier
2023. Best practices for sign language technology research. Universal Access in the Information Society
Fuks, Orit
2021. The distribution of handshapes in the established lexicon of Israeli Sign Language (ISL). Semiotica 2021:242 ► pp. 101 ff.
GARCIA, Brigitte & Emmanuella MARTINOD
2017. Perceptual anchoring and invariance in sign languages (LS), languages of the deaf. Écho des études romanes 13:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Garcia, Brigitte & Marie-Anne Sallandre
2020. Contribution of the Semiological Approach to Deixis–Anaphora in Sign Language: The Key Role of Eye-Gaze. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Gutierrez-Sigut, Eva, Brendan Costello, Cristina Baus & Manuel Carreiras
2016. LSE-Sign: A lexical database for Spanish Sign Language. Behavior Research Methods 48:1 ► pp. 123 ff.
Hendriks, Bernadet & Shelley Dufoe
2014. Non-native or native vocabulary in Mexican Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 20 ff.
Hodge, Gabrielle & Lindsay Ferrara
2022. Iconicity as Multimodal, Polysemiotic, and Plurifunctional. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Hodge, Gabrielle, Lindsay N. Ferrara & Benjamin D. Anible
2019. The semiotic diversity of doing reference in a deaf signed language. Journal of Pragmatics 143 ► pp. 33 ff.
Johnston, T.
2012. Lexical Frequency in Sign Languages. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 17:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Johnston, Trevor
2013. Towards a comparative semiotics of pointing actions in signed and spoken languages. Gesture 13:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Johnston, Trevor
2014. The reluctant oracle: using strategic annotations to add value to, and extract value from, a signed language corpus. Corpora 9:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Johnston, Trevor, Jane van Roekel & Adam Schembri
2016. On the Conventionalization of Mouth Actions in Australian Sign Language. Language and Speech 59:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Kaneko, Michiko & Rachel Sutton-Spence
2012. Iconicity and Metaphor in Sign Language Poetry. Metaphor and Symbol 27:2 ► pp. 107 ff.
Kendon, Adam
2024. Contributions to the Study of Visible Action as Utterance: A Fifty-Year Retrospective. In The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies, ► pp. 133 ff.
Keränen, Jarkko
2021. Iconic strategies in lexical sensory signs in Finnish Sign Language. Cognitive Semiotics 14:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Kimmelman, Vadim
2018. Basic argument structure in Russian Sign Language. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1
Kimmelman, Vadim, Vanja de Lint, Connie de Vos, Marloes Oomen, Roland Pfau, Lianne Vink & Enoch O. Aboh
2019. Argument Structure of Classifier Predicates: Canonical and Non-canonical Mappings in Four Sign Languages. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 332 ff.
Kimmelman, Vadim, Anna Komarova, Lyudmila Luchkova, Valeria Vinogradova & Oksana Alekseeva
2022. Exploring Networks of Lexical Variation in Russian Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Kimmelman, Vadim, Maria Kyuseva, Yana Lomakina & Daria Perova
Koenders, Emily
Konrad, Reiner, Gabriele Langer, Anke Müller & Sabrina Wähl
2022. Where frozen signs reclaim iconic ground. In Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 18], ► pp. 265 ff.
Lepic, Ryan
2019. A usage-based alternative to “lexicalization” in sign language linguistics. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1
Lepic, Ryan, Carl Börstell, Gal Belsitzman & Wendy Sandler
Lepic, Ryan & Corrine Occhino
2018. A Construction Morphology Approach to Sign Language Analysis. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 141 ff.
Loos, Cornelia & Donna Jo Napoli
2021. Expanding Echo: Coordinated Head Articulations as Nonmanual Enhancements in Sign Language Phonology. Cognitive Science 45:5
Lutzenberger, Hannah, Marisa Casillas, Paula Fikkert, Onno Crasborn & Connie de Vos
2024. More Than Looks: Exploring Methods to Test Phonological Discrimination in the Sign Language Kata Kolok. Language Learning and Development ► pp. 1 ff.
Macedo, María Noel, Matías Yerro, Jorge Vivas, Mauricio Castillo, Maximiliano Meliande, Adriana de León, Alejandro Fojo & Roberto Aguirre
2023. Contrasting the semantic typology biases of Deaf and hearing nonsigners in their conceptualization of time and space. Applied Psycholinguistics 44:6 ► pp. 1090 ff.
Major, George, Jemina Napier, Lindsay Ferrara & Trevor Johnston
2013. Exploring lexical gaps in Australian Sign Language for the purposes of health communication. Communication and Medicine 9:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar & Selçuk İşsever
2018. Agreement Verbs in Turkish Sign Language (TİD) from the Perspective of Templatic Morphology. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 29:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
McKee, Rachel, Josefina Safar & Sara Pivac Alexander
2021. Form, frequency and sociolinguistic variation in depicting signs in New Zealand Sign Language. Language & Communication 79 ► pp. 95 ff.
McKee, Rachel & Mireille Vale
2017. Sign language lexicography. In International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography, ► pp. 1 ff.
McKee, Rachel & Mireille Vale
2024. Recent lexical expansion in New Zealand Sign Language: context, scope and mechanisms. Current Issues in Language Planning 25:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Meir, Irit & Ariel Cohen
2018. Metaphor in Sign Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Mirus, Gene, Jami Fisher & Donna Jo Napoli
2012. Taboo expressions in American Sign Language. Lingua 122:9 ► pp. 1004 ff.
Murgiano, Margherita, Yasamin Motamedi & Gabriella Vigliocco
2021. Situating Language in the Real-World: The Role of Multimodal Iconicity and Indexicality. Journal of Cognition 4:1
Napier, Jemina, George Major, Lindsay Ferrara & Trevor Johnston
2015. Medical Signbank as a model for sign language planning? A review of community engagement. Current Issues in Language Planning 16:3 ► pp. 279 ff.
Napoli, Donna Jo & Nathan Sanders
Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton-Spence
Nijen Twilhaar, Jan & Beppie van den Bogaerde
OCCHINO, CORRINE, BENJAMIN ANIBLE & JILL P. MORFORD
2020. The role of iconicity, construal, and proficiency in the online processing of handshape. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 114 ff.
Perlman, Marcus, Hannah Little, Bill Thompson & Robin L. Thompson
2018. Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Quinto-Pozos, David
2007. Can constructed action be considered obligatory?. Lingua 117:7 ► pp. 1285 ff.
Sanders, Nathan & Donna Jo Napoli
2016. A cross-linguistic preference for torso stability in the lexicon. Sign Language & Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Sandler, Wendy
2017. The Challenge of Sign Language Phonology. Annual Review of Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Sandler, Wendy
2018. The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Sandler, Wendy
2021. Chapter 4. Signs and words. In All Things Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 353], ► pp. 57 ff.
Schembri, Adam, David McKee, Rachel McKee, Sara Pivac, Trevor Johnston & Della Goswell
2009. Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change 21:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Shi, Bowen, Diane Brentari, Greg Shakhnarovich & Karen Livescu
2021. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), ► pp. 4164 ff.
SLONIMSKA, ANITA, ASLI ÖZYÜREK & OLGA CAPIRCI
2021. Using depiction for efficient communication in LIS (Italian Sign Language). Language and Cognition 13:3 ► pp. 367 ff.
Stamp, Rose, Adam Schembri, Jordan Fenlon, Ramas Rentelis, Bencie Woll, Kearsy Cormier & Howard Nusbaum
2014. Lexical Variation and Change in British Sign Language. PLoS ONE 9:4 ► pp. e94053 ff.
Supalla, Ted, Fanny Limousin & Betsy Hicks McDonald
2020. Historical Change in American Sign Language. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ► pp. 423 ff.
TAŞÇI, Süleyman & Aslı GÖKSEL
2018. Native compounds in TİD: A classification based on headedness. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Tkachman, Oksana, Kathleen Currie Hall, Robert Fuhrman & Yurika Aonuki
2019. Visible amplitude: Towards quantifying prominence in sign language. Journal of Phonetics 77 ► pp. 100935 ff.
Tkachman, Oksana & Irit Meir
2018. Novel compounding and the emergence of structure in two young sign languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1
Tomasuolo, Elena, Chiara Bonsignori, Pasquale Rinaldi & Virginia Volterra
2020. The representation of action in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Cognitive Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
van der Kooij, Els, Inge Zwitserlood & Onno Crasborn
Vermeerbergen, Myriam
2006. Past and current trends in sign language research. Language & Communication 26:2 ► pp. 168 ff.
Vlášková, Lucia & Hana Strachoňová
2021. Sign language lexicography: a case study of an online dictionary. Slovenščina 2.0: empirical, applied and interdisciplinary research 9:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
Wehrmeyer, Ella
2022. Psycholinguistic errors in signed simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 24:2 ► pp. 192 ff.
Zeshan, Ulrike
2003. Towards a notion of ‘word’ in sign languages. In Word, ► pp. 153 ff.
Zeshan, Ulrike & Nick Palfreyman
2020. Comparability of signed and spoken languages: Absolute and relative modality effects in cross-modal typology. Linguistic Typology 24:3 ► pp. 527 ff.
Zwitserlood, Inge, Els van der Kooij & Onno Crasborn
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.