The Medium and the Message
Prosodic Interpretation of Linguistic Content in Israeli Sign Language
In natural communication, the medium through which language is transmitted plays an important and systematic role. Sentences are broken up rhythmically into chunks; certain elements receive special stress; and, in spoken language, intonational tunes are superimposed onto these chunks in particular ways — all resulting in an intricate system of prosody. Investigations of prosody in Israeli Sign Language demonstrate that sign languages have comparable prosodic systems to those of spoken languages, although the phonetic medium is completely different. Evidence for the prosodic word and for the phonological phrase in ISL is examined here within the context of the relationship between the medium and the message. New evidence is offered to support the claim that facial expression in sign languages corresponds to intonation in spoken languages, and the term “superarticulation” is coined to describe this system in sign languages. Interesting formaldiffer ences between the intonationaltunes of spoken language and the “superarticulatory arrays” of sign language are shown to offer a new perspective on the relation between the phonetic basis of language, its phonological organization, and its communicative content.
Keywords: intonation, sign language, Israeli Sign Language, prosody, superarticulation
Published online: 01 January 2000
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.2.2.04san
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.2.2.04san
Cited by
Cited by 38 other publications
Antonakos, Epameinondas, Vassilis Pitsikalis & Petros Maragos
2014. Classification of extreme facial events in sign language videos.
EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing 2014:1 
Antonakos, Epameinondas, Anastasios Roussos & Stefanos Zafeiriou
2015.
In 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG),
► pp. 1 ff.
Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer
2016.
In The Linguistics of Sign Languages,
Brentari, D.
2006.
In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,
► pp. 338 ff.
Brentari, Diane
2019.
In Sign Language Phonology,
Coons, Caitie
2022. Nominal Word Order Typology in Signed Languages.
Frontiers in Communication 6
Crasborn, O.A.
2006.
In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,
► pp. 668 ff.
Crasborn, Onno
2011.
In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology,
► pp. 1 ff.
CRASBORN, ONNO & ELS VAN DER KOOIJ
2013. The phonology of focus in Sign Language of the Netherlands.
Journal of Linguistics 49:3 ► pp. 515 ff.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Christina Healy & Wendy Sandler
2013. Visual intonation in two sign languages.
Phonology 30:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler
2009. Visual Intonation in the Prosody of a Sign Language.
Language and Speech 52:2-3 ► pp. 287 ff.
Eccarius, Petra & Diane Brentari
2007. Symmetry and dominance: A cross-linguistic study of signs and classifier constructions.
Lingua 117:7 ► pp. 1169 ff.
Gabarró-López, Sílvia
2019. Describing buoys from the perspective of discourse markers.
Sign Language & Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 210 ff.
Hartmann, Katharina, Roland Pfau & Iris Legeland
2021. Asymmetry and Contrast: Coordination in Sign Language of the Netherlands.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 35:1
Hohenberger, Annette
2008. The word in sign language: empirical evidence and theoretical controversies.
Linguistics 46:2
Johnston, Trevor, Jane van Roekel & Adam Schembri
2016. On the Conventionalization of Mouth Actions in Australian Sign Language.
Language and Speech 59:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Lutzenberger, Hannah, Roland Pfau & Connie de Vos
2022. Emergence or Grammaticalization? The Case of Negation in Kata Kolok.
Languages 7:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Mantovan, Lara, Beatrice Giustolisi & Francesca Panzeri
2019. Signing something while meaning its opposite: The expression of irony in Italian Sign Language (LIS).
Journal of Pragmatics 142 ► pp. 47 ff.
Murgiano, Margherita, Yasamin Motamedi & Gabriella Vigliocco
2021. Situating Language in the Real-World: The Role of Multimodal Iconicity and Indexicality.
Journal of Cognition 4:1
Napoli, Donna Jo & Casey Ferrara
2021. Correlations Between Handshape and Movement in Sign Languages.
Cognitive Science 45:5
Pfau, Roland, Martin Salzmann & Markus Steinbach
2018. The syntax of sign language agreement: Common ingredients, but unusual recipe.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1
Puupponen, Anna, Tuija Wainio, Birgitta Burger & Tommi Jantunen
2015. Head movements in Finnish Sign Language on the basis of Motion Capture data.
Sign Language & Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Sandler, Wendy
2009. Symbiotic symbolization by hand and mouth in sign language.
Semiotica 2009:174
Sandler, Wendy
2010. Prosody and syntax in sign languages.
Transactions of the Philological Society 108:3 ► pp. 298 ff.
Sandler, Wendy
2012. The Phonological Organization of Sign Languages.
Language and Linguistics Compass 6:3 ► pp. 162 ff.
Sandler, Wendy
2018. The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language.
Frontiers in Psychology 9
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Svetlana Dachkovsky, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
2011. The emergence of complexity in prosody and syntax.
Lingua 121:13 ► pp. 2014 ff.
Steinbach, Markus
2011. What do agreement auxiliaries reveal about the grammar of sign language agreement?.
Theoretical Linguistics 37:3-4
Sze, Felix
2015. Is Hong Kong Sign Language a topic-prominent language?.
Linguistics 53:4
Tkachman, Oksana, Kathleen Currie Hall, Robert Fuhrman & Yurika Aonuki
2019. Visible amplitude: Towards quantifying prominence in sign language.
Journal of Phonetics 77 ► pp. 100935 ff.
Tkachman, Oksana & Irit Meir
2018. Novel compounding and the emergence of structure in two young sign languages.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1
van der Kooij, Els & Onno Crasborn
2008. Syllables and the word-prosodic system in Sign Language of the Netherlands.
Lingua 118:9 ► pp. 1307 ff.
van der Kooij, Els, Onno Crasborn & Wim Emmerik
2006. Explaining prosodic body leans in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Pragmatics required.
Journal of Pragmatics 38:10 ► pp. 1598 ff.
Zeshan, Ulrike
2003.
In Word,
► pp. 153 ff.
Zeshan, Ulrike
2004. Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages.
Linguistic Typology 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Zeshan, Ulrike
2015. “Making meaning”: Communication between sign language users without a shared language.
Cognitive Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
Zeshan, Ulrike & Sibaji Panda
2018. Sign-speaking: The structure of simultaneous bimodal utterances
.
Applied Linguistics Review 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Zwitserlood, Inge, Pamela Perniss & Aslı Özyürek
2012. An empirical investigation of expression of multiple entities in Turkish Sign Language (TİD): Considering the effects of modality.
Lingua 122:14 ► pp. 1636 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.