Abstract published in:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 20:1 (2017) ► pp. 135145

Full-text

Sign language varieties of Indonesia
References

References

De Vos, Connie
2012Sign-spatiality in Kata Kolok: How a village sign language of Bali inscribes its signing space. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute of Psycholinguistics dissertation.Google Scholar
Dikyuva, Hasan
2011Grammatical non-manual expressions in Turkish Sign Language. Preston: University of Central Lancashire MA thesis.Google Scholar
2013Academics and Deaf communities: The ‘Deaf voice’. Presentation at the iSLanDS workshop on Realising the Link – Academics and Deaf Community Development , 17 June 2013, University of Central Lancashire, Preston.Google Scholar
Dikyuva, Hasan, Cesar Ernesto Escobedo Delgado, Sibaji Panda & Ulrike Zeshan
2012Working with village sign language communities: Deaf fieldwork researchers in professional dialogue. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (eds.), Sign languages in village communities. Anthropological and linguistic insights, 313–344. Berlin: de Gruyter and Ishara Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 142 ]
Fischer, Susan & Qunhu Gong
2010Variation in East Asian sign language structures. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 499–518. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Volume 1, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Isma, Silva Tenrisara Pertiwi
2012Signing varieties in Jakarta and Yogyakarta: Dialects or separate languages?, Hong Kong: CUHK MA thesis.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Robert Bayley & Clayton Valli
2001Sociolinguistic variation in ASL. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Marsaja, I Gede
2008Desa Kolok – A Deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Palfreyman, Nick
submitted. Social meanings of linguistic variation in Indonesian Sign Language.
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
2007On the syntax of negation and modals in German Sign Language (DGS) and Catalan Sign Language (LSC). In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Marcus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure, 129–161. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tang, Gladys
2006Questions and negation in Hong Kong Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 198–224. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, James
1993The relationship of sign language varieties in India, Pakistan, and Nepal. Sign Language Studies 78. 15–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Sign languages and sign language families in Thailand and Vietnam. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 23–47. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2011Some observations on research methodology in lexicostatistical studies of sign languages. In Gaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, 38–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2006Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Basri, Syartina Elfarika, Dolly Indra, Herdianti Darwis, A. Widya Mufila, Lutfi Budi Ilmawan & Bobby Purwanto
2021.  In 2021 3rd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT),  pp. 405 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Yaqing & Qunhu Gong
2020. Dialects or languages: A corpus-based quantitative approach to lexical variation in common signs in Chinese Sign Language (CSL). Lingua 248  pp. 102944 ff. Crossref logo
Palfreyman, Nick, Keiko Sagara & Ulrike Zeshan
2015.  In Research Methods in Sign Language Studies,  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.