Article In:
Sign Language & Linguistics: Online-First Articles

The indefinite-interrogative affinity in Catalan Sign Language (LSC)

ORCID logo | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Amsterdam
This paper explores the morphology and the licensing conditions of a particular type of indefinite pronouns, referred to as quex-indefinites, which are morphologically identical or closely related to question words. We present findings from two studies investigating these forms in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). The first study is based on elicitation with three LSC consultants, while the second is an online experiment which collected judgments from 50 deaf LSC signers. Our research reveals that LSC quex-indefinites may be either identical to or resemble question words and identifies the semantic categories and environments that allow them. Specifically, quex-indefinites in LSC are possible in the categories of person, quantity, cause, and time. The licensing environments include polar questions, antecedents of conditionals, positive episodic sentences, and some modal environments. This study provides the first description of quex-indefinites in a sign language, contributing to the understanding of the affinity between indefinite and interrogative pronouns.
Keywords: indefinite-interrogative affinity, quexistentials, Catalan Sign Language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Quexistentials in spoken languages
      • 2.1.1Cross-linguistic distribution
      • 2.1.2Licensing conditions
    • 2.2Quexistentials in sign languages
  • 3.Study 1: Data elicitation
    • 3.1Method
    • 3.2Results
      • 3.2.1Indefinite signs in LSC
      • 3.2.2Quexistentials in LSC
      • 3.2.3Licensing of quex-indefinites
      • 3.2.4Manual and non-manual marking
    • 3.3Summary
  • 4.Study 2: Online experiment
    • 4.1The quex-Statement condition
    • 4.2Participants
    • 4.3Materials and design
      • 4.3.1Task 1
      • 4.3.2Task 2
    • 4.4Procedure
    • 4.5Data availability
    • 4.6Data treatment and analysis
    • 4.7Results
      • 4.7.1Task 1
      • 4.7.2Task 2
      • 4.7.3 quex-Statements in Tasks 1 and 2
    • 4.8Summary
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Licensing and disambiguation of bare quexistentials
    • 5.2Asymmetric markedness relation
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Author contributions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (72)
References
Aboh, Enoch O., Roland Pfau & Ulrike Zeshan. 2005. When a wh-word is not a wh-word: The case of Indian Sign Language. In Tanmoy Bhattacharya (ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 11–43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alba, Cèlia. 2016. Wh-Questions in Catalan Sign Language. Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra University PhD dissertation.
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2015. Epistemic indefinites. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Alsenoy, Lauren. 2014. A new typology of indefinite pronouns, with a focus on negative indefinites. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen PhD dissertation.
AnderBois, Scott. 2012. Focus and uninformativity in Yukatek Maya questions. Natural Language Semantics 201. 349–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bahan, Benjamin J. 1996. Nonmanual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. Boston, MA: Boston University PhD dissertation.
Barberà, Gemma. 2015. The meaning of space in sign language. Reference, specificity and structure in Catalan Sign Language discourse. Berlin & Nijmegen: Mouton de Gruyter & Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Indefiniteness and specificity marking in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Sign Language & Linguistics 19(1). 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Specificity and definiteness. In Josep Quer, Roland Pfau & Annika Herrmann (eds.), The Routledge handbook of theoretical and experimental sign language research, 403–422. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barberà, Gemma & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr. 2018. Two indefinite pronouns in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). In Robert Truswell, Chris Cummins, Caroline Heycock, Brian Rabern & Hannah Rohde (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21 1, 89–106. University of Edinburgh. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barberà, Gemma, Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Josep Quer. 2018. Agent-backgrounding in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Sign Language & Linguistics 21(2). 334–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barberà, Gemma & Josep Quer. 2013. Impersonal reference in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). In Laurence Meurant, Aurélie Sinte, Mieke Van Herreweghe & Myriam Vermeerbergen (eds.), Sign language research uses and practices: Crossing views on theoretical and applied sign language linguistics, 237–258. Berlin & Nijmegen: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berthelin, Signe Rix. 2020. Semantic elicitation: A discussion of elicitation frames and their application. Semantic Fieldwork Methods 2(1). 1–34.Google Scholar
Bhat, Darbhe Narayana Shankara. 2004. The indefinite-interrogative puzzle. In Pronouns, 226–249. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bochnak, M. Ryan & Lisa Matthewson. 2020. Techniques in complex semantic fieldwork. Annual Review of Linguistics 61. 261–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2015. A practical epistemology for semantic elicitation in the field and elsewhere. In M. Ryan Bochnak & Lisa Matthewson (eds.), Methodologies in semantic fieldwork, 13–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branchini, Chiara & Lara Mantovan. 2020. A grammar of Italian Sign Language (LIS). Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2007. Wh-in-situ does not correlate with wh-indefinites or question particles. Linguistic Inquiry 381. 139–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cañas Peña, Sara. 2021. Polar interrogatives in Catalan Sign Language (LSC): A comprehensive grammatical analysis. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra PhD dissertation.
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2012. Sentence types. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 292–315. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Zhuo. 2018. Wh-indefinites are dependent indefinites: a study on shenme . In Wm. G. Bennett, Lindsay Hracs & Dennis Ryan Storoshenko (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 142–150. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy. 2012. Pronouns. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 227–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij. 2013. The phonology of focus in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Journal of Linguistics 491. 515–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij, Dafydd Waters, Bencie Woll & Johanna Mesch. 2008. Frequency distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics 111. 45–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2009. More on the indefinite-interrogative affinity: The view from embedded non-finite interrogatives. Linguistic Typology 13(1). 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gökgöz, Kadir & Ronnie B. Wilbur. 2017. Positive bias in negative yes/no questions: Evidence for Neg-to-C in TİD. In Paweł Rutkowski (ed.), Different faces of sign language research, vol. 21, 15–41. Warsaw: Faculty of Polish Studies, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Gomez-Jackson, Delaney R. 2023. Questions and indefinites in Santiago Laxopa Zapotec. Santa Cruz, CA University of California MA thesis.
Haida, Andreas. 2008. The indefiniteness and focusing of question words. In Tova Friedman & Satoshi Ito (eds.), SALT 18 1, 376–393. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrell Jr, Frank E. 2021. Package ‘hmisc’. [URL]. R package version 4.5–0.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Indefinite pronouns (v2020.3). In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World atlas of language structures online, Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, Sabine Iatridou & Floris Roelofsen. 2022. Quexistentials and focus. Linguistic Inquiry 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horton, Laura, Susan Goldin-Meadow, Marie Coppola, Ann Senghas & Diane Brentari. 2015. Forging a morphological system out of two dimensions: Agentivity and number. Open Linguistics 11. 596–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Idiatov, Dmitry. 2007. A typology of non-selective interrogative pronominals. Antwerp: University of Antwerp PhD dissertation.
Kaneko, Makoto. 2011. DP external epistemic ‘determiners’ in Japanese. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 8 1, 239–266. [Online, available at [URL]].
Kelepir, Meltem, Aslı Özkul & Elvan Tamyürek Özparlak. 2018. Agent-backgrounding in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). Sign Language & Linguistics 21(2). 257–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim & Roland Pfau. 2016. Information structure in sign languages. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure, 814–834. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lackner, Andrea. 2018. Interrogativity. In Functions of head and body movements in Austrian Sign Language, 139–170. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1992. Indefinite Wh- in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11. 125–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Hao. 2019. Interrogative marking in Chinese Sign Language: A preliminary corpus-based investigation. Sign Language & Linguistics 22(2). 241–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2009. Content interrogatives in a sample of 50 languages. Lingua 119(8). 1131–1163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa. 2004. On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics 70(4). 369–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKee, Rachel. 2006. Aspects of interrogatives and negation in New Zealand Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 70–90. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1969. Determination. Working Papers on Language Universals 11, 63–98a. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Michael W. 2006. Interrogatives and negatives in Japanese Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 91–127. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Navarrete-González, Alexandra. 2019. The notion of focus and its relation to contrast in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Sensos-e 61. 18–40.Google Scholar
. 2022. Focus and contrast in Catalan Sign Language: Form and interpretation. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra PhD dissertation.
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nuhabaoglu, Derya & Okan Kubus. 2020. Lexicon: 3.7. pronouns. In Sina Proske, Derya Nuhbalaoglu, Annika Herrmann, Jana Hosemann & Markus Steinbach (eds.), A Grammar of German Sign Language (DGS), (SIGN-HUB Sign Language Grammar Series) ([URL]).
Onea, Edgar. 2021. Indefinite-interrogative affinity. In Daniel Gutzmann, Lisa Matthewson, Cecile Meier, Hotze Rullmann & Thomas E. Zimmermann (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to semantics, vol. 51, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2006. Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages ( Linguistics in Potsdam 24). Potsdam: Universitäts-Verlag. Available at [URL]
Postma, Gertjan. 1994. The indefinite reading of WH. Linguistics in the Netherlands 11(1). 187–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quer, Josep (dir.), Eva M. Rondoni (dir. tècn.), Gemma Barberà, Santiago Frigola, Delfina Aliaga, Josep Boronat, Joan M. Gil, Pilar Iglesias & Marina Martínez. 2005. Gramàtica bàsica LSC. Barcelona: FESOCA, DOMAD. [URL]
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Sandler, Wendy. 1999. The medium and the message: Prosodic interpretation of linguistic content in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(2). 187–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savolainen, Leena. 2006. Interrogatives and negatives in Finnish Sign Language: An overview. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 284–302. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Sudo, Yasutada. 2010. Wh-Ka pronouns in Japanese and the semantics of indeterminate pronouns. Paper presented at the Workshop on Epistemic Indefinites, University of Göttingen.
Tang, Gladys. 2006. Questions and negation in Hong Kong Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 198–224. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Ultan, Russell. 1969. Some general characteristics of interrogative systems. Working Papers on Language Universals 11, 41–63a. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
van Valin, Robert D. 1993. A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In Robert van Valin (ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar, 1–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veiga Busto, Raquel, Floris Roelofsen & Alexandra Navarrete-González. 2023. The indefinite-interrogative affinity in sign languages: the case of Catalan Sign Language. In Valentin D. Richard & Floris Roelofsen (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th workshop on inquisitiveness below and beyond the sentence boundary, 50–60. Nancy, France: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1997. A prosodic/pragmatic explanation for word order variation in ASL with typological implications. In Marjolijn H. Vespoor, Kee Dong Lee & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the constructions of meaning, 89–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999. Stress in ASL: Empirical evidence and linguistic issues. Language and Speech 421. 229–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yanovich, Igor. 2005. Choice-functional series of indefinite pronouns and Hamblin semantics. In Efthymia Georgala & Jonathan Howell (eds.), SALT 15 1, 309–326. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yun, Jiwon. 2013. Wh-indefinites: meaning and prosody: Cornell University PhD dissertation.
Zeshan, Ulrike. 2003. Indo-Pakistani Sign Language grammar: A typological outline. Sign Language Studies 31. 157–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 80(1). 7–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Negative and interrogative constructions in sign languages: A case study in sign language typology. In Ulrike Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 28–68. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike & Nick Palfreyman. 2017. Sign language typology. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology, 178–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar