Since the original Stokoe notation, many new variants and transcription systems have been proposed: currently, HamNoSys and Stokoe derivatives are most widespread. Sign language research is in real need of a standard of its own. Exchanging data in a standard notation should save authors the time and effort needed to produce photographs, drawings or video captures illustrating data and should allow researchers to present in an explicit form the aspects of the data that are truly relevant for their purposes. Since a notation extracts from the raw data what is of interest to the researcher, it is bound to reflect certain analytical assumptions and prejudices. To maximize a notation’s usefulness, a permanent process of discussion and revision is thus necessary. Particular issues that must be dealt with in designing a sign language notation system include the distinction “internal” vs. “external” descriptions, non-manuals and simultaneous use of two hands.
2020. Building the first comprehensive machine-readable Turkish sign language resource: methods, challenges and solutions. Language Resources and Evaluation 54:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Bouzid, Yosra & Mohamed Jemni
2013. 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ► pp. 92 ff.
Bouzid, Yosra & Mohamed Jemni
2014. 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ► pp. 601 ff.
Miller, C.
2006. Sign Language: Transcription, Notation, and Writing. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 353 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.