Article published in:Sign Transcription and Database Storage of Sign Information
Edited by Brita Bergman, Penny Boyes-Braem, Thomas Hanke and Elena Antinoro Pizzuto
[Sign Language & Linguistics 4:1/2] 2001
► pp. 47–62
Encoding and capturing productive morphology
This article discusses the ways in which a multi-media database can facilitate the analysis of ‘the productive lexicon’ within signed language. The database can free us, at least to some extent, from over-reliance on glossing. Analysis of productive forms is dependent upon accurate identification of these forms and consistent categorization of the component morphemes. Relevant categories of morphemes may include classifiers, nonmanual morphemes, metaphors and vocational morphemes. While questions may be raised about the status of each of these categories, the database can allow us to analyse and re-categorize, thus allowing different types of patterning to emerge. This should ultimately allow us to recognize the most linguistically efficient form of categorization. It is also suggested here that visual motivation has a triggering effect on sign production. By marking the different types of visual motivation, we can chart their significance within the language.
Keywords: productive lexicon, visual motivation, productive morphology, lexical database, morphological database, digital video, morphological categorization, British Sign Language
Published online: 18 October 2002
Cited by 1 other publications
Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.