Article published in:
Units of Talk – Units of ActionEdited by Beatrice Szczepek Reed and Geoffrey Raymond
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 25] 2013
► pp. 207–242
When ‘yes’ is not enough – as an answer to a yes/no question
Jakob Steensig | Aarhus University
Trine Heinemann | University of Southern Denmark
This article investigates confirming answers to yes/no questions that consist of more than the type-conforming ‘yes’ token. The study is based on 160 cases of question-answer sequences with confirming answers, taken from a corpus of Danish interactions. The authors claim that certain actions, which are carried out as yes/no questions, demand a response unit that consists of ‘yes’ plus an elaboration. The actions that have this far-reaching projection are: (1) expansion-eliciting questions, (2) knowledge discrepancy questions, and (3) specification requests. The authors found no simple relationship between syntax and action. Some of the actions that demand more than a ‘yes’ can be carried out with both interrogative and declarative syntax, whereas others are done only interrogatively. Keywords: yes/no questions; responses; confirmations; elaborations
Published online: 22 October 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25.07ste
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25.07ste
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
Drake, Veronika
Heinemann, Trine
Heinemann, Trine & Jakob Steensig
Kurhila, Salla & Inkeri Lehtimaja
Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea
Rasmussen, Gitte
Steensig, Jakob & Trine Heinemann
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
Zhang Waring, Hansun, Elizabeth Reddington, Di Yu & Ignasi Clemente
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.