Cover not available
Part of
Requesting in Social Interaction
Edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 26] 2014
► pp. 303–334

When do people not use language to make requests?

| Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
In everyday joint activities (e.g. playing cards, preparing potatoes, collecting empty plates), participants often request others to pass, move or otherwise deploy objects. In order to get these objects to or from the requestee, requesters need to manipulate them, for example by holding them out, reaching for them, or placing them somewhere. As they perform these manual actions, requesters may or may not accompany them with language (e.g. Take this potato and cut it or Pass me your plate). This study shows that adding or omitting language in the design of a request is influenced in the first place by a criterion of recognition. When the requested action is projectable from the advancement of an activity, presenting a relevant object to the requestee is enough for them to understand what to do; when, on the other hand, the requested action is occasioned by a contingent development of the activity, requesters use language to specify what the requestee should do. This criterion operates alongside a perceptual criterion, to do with the affordances of the visual and auditory modalities. When the requested action is projectable but the requestee is not visually attending to the requester’s manual behaviour, the requester can use just enough language to attract the requestee’s attention and secure immediate recipiency. This study contributes to a line of research concerned with the organisation of verbal and nonverbal resources for requesting. Focussing on situations in which language is not – or only minimally – used, it demonstrates the role played by visible bodily behaviour and by the structure of everyday activities in the formation and understanding of requests.
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.12ros
References (87)
References
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Trevor M. 2013. “Signaling Trouble: On the linguistic design of other-initiation of repair in English conversation.” PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper. 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Butterworth, George, and Edward Cochran. 1980. “Towards a Mechanism of Joint Visual Attention in Human Infancy.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 3 (3): 253–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cekaite, Asta. 2010. “Shepherding the Child: Embodied Directive Sequences in Parent–child Interactions.” Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 30 (1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Pointing and Placing.” In Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet, ed. by Sotaro Kita, 243–268. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs. 1986. “Referring as a Collaborative Process.” Cognition 22 (1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter. 2010. “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 419–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dausendschön-Gay, Ulrich, and Ulrich Krafft. 2009. “Preparing Next Actions in Routine Activities.” Discourse Processes 46 (2–3): 247–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jorio, Andrea. 1832. La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire napoletano [ Gestural expression of the ancients in the light of Neapolitan gesturing ]. Dalla stamperia e cartiera del Fibreno.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2005. “Conversation analysis”. In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, edited by Kristine L. Fitch and Robert E. Sanders, 71–102. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul. 1976. “Movements with Precise Meanings.” Journal of Communication 26 (3): 14–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N.J. 2008. “Common Ground as a Resource for Social Affiliation.” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskes, and Jacob L. Mey, 223–254. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2009. The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Relationship Thinking: Enchrony, Agency and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N.J., and Tanya Stivers (eds). 2007. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engle, Randi. 1998. “Not Channels but Composite Signals: Speech, Gesture, Diagrams and Object Demonstrations are Integrated in Multimodal Explanations.” In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. by Morton Ann Gernsbacher, and Sharon J. Derry, 321–327. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Flores Salgado, Elizabeth. 2011. The Pragmatics of Requests and Apologies: Developmental Patterns of Mexican Students. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Sandra A. Thompson, and Veronika Drake. 2012. “Bodily-Visual Practices and Turn Continuation.” Discourse Processes 49 (3–4): 192–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galeano, Giorgia, and Alessandra Fasulo. 2009. “Sequenze direttive tra genitori e figli [Directive sequences between parents and children].” Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa 2: 261–78.Google Scholar
Gibson, James Jerome. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2006. “Participation, Affect, and Trajectory in Family Directive/response Sequences.” Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies 26 (4–5): 515–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, ed. by P. Cole, and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, eds. 2013. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine. 2006. ““Will You or Can’t You?”: Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (7): 1081–1104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in Person (and Place) Reference.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, ed. by N.J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 255–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 1994. “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise, and Tiina Keisanen. 2012. “Linguistic and Embodied Formats for Making (concrete) Offers.” Discourse Studies 14 (5): 587–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keisanen, Tiina, and Mirka Rauniomaa. 2012. “The Organization of Participation and Contingency in Prebeginnings of Request Sequences.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (4): 323–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellermann, Kathy, Scott Broetzmann, Tae‐Seop Lim, and Kenji Kitao. 1989. “The Conversation Mop: Scenes in the Stream of Discourse.” Discourse Processes 12 (1): 27–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1985. “Some Uses of Gesture.” In Perspectives on Silence, ed. by Deborah Tannen, and Muriel Saville-Troike, 215–234. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Alexandra. 2011. “Directing Dinnertime: Practices and Resources Used by Parents and Children to Deliver and Respond to Directive Actions.” Ph.D. dissertation, Loughborough University.
Kita, Sotaro, Ingeborg van Gijn, and Harry van der Hulst. 1998. “Movement Phases in Signs and Co-Speech Gestures, and Their Transcription by Human Coders.” In Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction, ed. by Ipke Wachsmuth, and Martin Fröhlich, 23–35. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1371. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Seung-Hee. 2006. “Requests and Responses in Calls for Service.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
Lerner, Gene H. 1995. “Turn Design and the Organization of Participation in Instructional Activities.” Discourse Processes 19 (1): 111–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H., and Geoffrey Raymond. 2008. “Body Trouble: Some Sources of Interactional Trouble and Their Embodied Solution.” Unpublished manuscript.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1979. “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17 (5–6): 365–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. >Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liversedge, Simon, Iain Gilchrist, and Stefan Everling (eds). 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marr, David. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
McNeill, David (ed.). 2000. Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2011. “The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations”. In Embodied Interaction: Language and the Body in the Material World, edited. by Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron, 207–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Instructions in the operating room: how the surgeon directs their assistant's hands.” Discourse Studies 16(2):131–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva. 2009. “Politeness and in-Directness across Cultures: A Comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian Requests.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 5 (2): 189–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parry, Ruth. 2013. “Giving Reasons for Doing Something Now or at Some Other Time.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 46 (2): 105–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/no Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey, and Gene H. Lerner. ms. “Towards a Sociology of the Body in Action: The Body and Its Multiple Commitments.” Unpublished manuscript.
Robinson, Jeffrey David. 2013. “Overall Structural Organization.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 257–280. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rossano, Federico. 2013. “Sequence Organization and Timing of Bonobo Mother-Infant Interactions.” Interaction Studies 14 (2): 160–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2012. “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49 (5): 426–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rue, Yong-Ju, and Grace Qiao Zhang. 2008. Request Strategies: A Comparative Study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Vol. 2. ed. by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schank, Roger C., and Rober P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70 (6). New Series: 1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara A. Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language in Society 29(1):1–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007a. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007b. “Conveying Who You Are: The Presentation of Self, Strictly Speaking.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, ed. by N.J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 123–148. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening Up Closings.” Semiotica 8 (4): 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.” Language 53(2):361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (ed.). 2009. Conversation Analysis. Comparative Perspectives. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack, and Tanya Stivers, eds. 2013. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2007. “Alternative Recognitionals in Initial References to Persons.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, ed. by N.J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 73–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey David Robinson. 2006. “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 35 (3): 367–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 2009. Gesturecraft: The Manu-Facture of Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, and J. Scott Jordan (eds.). 2009. “Projection and Anticipation in Social Interaction.” Special Issue of Discourse Processes 46 (2–3).Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy Alice. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Svensson, Marcus Sanchez, Christian Heath, and Paul Luff. 2007. “Instrumental Action: The Timely Exchange of Implements during Surgical Operations.” In Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24–28 September 2007, Limerick, Ireland, ed. by L. Bannon, I. Wagner, R. Harper, and K. Schmidt, 41–60. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen. 2006. Request Sequences: The Intersection of Grammar, Interaction and Social Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toerien, Merran, and Celia Kitzinger. 2007. “Emotional Labour in Action: Navigating Multiple Involvements in the Beauty Salon.” Sociology 41 (4): 645–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne, and Henrike Moll. 2005. “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5): 675–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tulbert, Eve, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 2011. “Choreographies of Attention: Multimodality in a Routine Family Activity.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron, 79–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vinkhuyzen, Erik, and Margaret H. Szymanski. 2005. “Would You like to Do It Yourself? Service Requests and Their Non-Granting Responses.” In Applying Conversation Analysis, ed. by Keith Richards, and Paul Seedhouse, 91–106. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wootton, Anthony J. 1981. “Two Request Forms of Four Year Olds.” Journal of Pragmatics 5 (6): 511–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Interaction and the Development of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Eva Ogiermann. 2013. “Responsibility and Action: Invariants and Diversity in Requests for Objects in British English and Polish Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (3): 256–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (29)

Cited by 29 other publications

Chalfoun, Andrew, Giovanni Rossi & Tanya Stivers
2024. The Magic Word? Face-Work and the Functions of Please in Everyday Requests. Social Psychology Quarterly DOI logo
Lilja, Niina & Anna-Kaisa Jokipohja
2024. Gestural depictions in requests for objects. Language & Communication 99 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Svensson, Hanna
2024. Requesting another to taste: Passing food and the distribution of agency in the organization of bodily trajectories. Discourse Studies DOI logo
Eilola, Laura
2023. The design of requests by adult L2 users with emergent literacy. Classroom Discourse 14:2 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Gaskins, Dorota & Maria Frick
2023. Embodiment in directive sequences: The case of triadic interactions in a Polish-English bilingual family. International Journal of Bilingualism 27:1 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Mlynář, Jakub
2023. Lifting the pen and the gaze: embodied recruitment in collaborative writing. Text & Talk 43:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Oloff, Florence
2023. « Maintenant tout a disparu » : les requêtes indirectes déclaratives dans la formation numérique pour adultes. Langage et société N° 179:2 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Pekarek Doehler, Simona & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2023. La requête dans les interactions institutionnelles : une introduction. Langage et société N° 179:2 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Stokoe, Elizabeth & Emma Richardson
2023. Asking for help without asking for help: How victims request and police offer assistance in cases of domestic violence when perpetrators are potentially co-present. Discourse Studies 25:3 ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Babel, Franziska, Andrea Vogt, Philipp Hock, Johannes Kraus, Florian Angerer, Tina Seufert & Martin Baumann
2022. Step Aside! VR-Based Evaluation of Adaptive Robot Conflict Resolution Strategies for Domestic Service Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 14:5 ► pp. 1239 ff. DOI logo
Montiegel, Kristella
2022. Teachers’ gestures for building listening and spoken language skills. Discourse Processes 59:10 ► pp. 771 ff. DOI logo
Deppermann, Arnulf & Axel Schmidt
2021. Micro-Sequential Coordination in Early Responses. Discourse Processes 58:4 ► pp. 372 ff. DOI logo
Enfield, N. J. & Jack Sidnell
2021. Intersubjectivity is Activity Plus Accountability. In Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution, ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Pfeiffer, Martin & Marina Anna
2021.  Recruiting Assistance in Early Childhood: Longitudinal Changes in the Use of “ Oh +X” as a Way of Reporting Trouble in German . Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:2 ► pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Pulles, Maaike, Jan Berenst, Tom Koole & Kees De Glopper
2021. How primary school children address reading problems in dialogic reading. Research on Children and Social Interaction 4:2 DOI logo
Hoey, Elliott M.
2020. When Conversation Lapses, DOI logo
Huth, Thorsten, Emma Betz & Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm
2019. Rethinking language teacher training: steps for making talk-in-interaction research accessible to practitioners. Classroom Discourse 10:1 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Jansson, Gunilla, Charlotta Plejert & Camilla Lindholm
2019. The social organization of assistance in multilingual interaction in Swedish residential care. Discourse Studies 21:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Keevallik, Leelo
2018. What Does Embodied Interaction Tell Us About Grammar?. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2018. Driving instruction at high speed on a race circuit: Issues in action formation and sequence organization. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël & Simone Heinold
2017. Imperatives and directive strategies from a functional-typological perspective. In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184], DOI logo
Baranova, Julija & Mark Dingemanse
2016. Reasons for requests. Discourse Studies 18:6 ► pp. 641 ff. DOI logo
Heritage, John
2016. The Recruitment Matrix. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Holttinen, Tuuli, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. Stratégies de requête dans un bureau de tabac et dans son équivalent finlandaisR-kioski. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 02007 ff. DOI logo
Kendrick, Kobin H. & Paul Drew
2016. Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kent, Alexandra & Kobin H. Kendrick
2016. Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:3 ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Zinken, Jörg & Giovanni Rossi
2016. Assistance and Other Forms of Cooperative Engagement. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1 ► pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
Fox, Barbara A. & Trine Heinemann
2015. The Alignment of Manual and Verbal Displays in Requests for the Repair of an Object. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:3 ► pp. 342 ff. DOI logo
Fox, Barbara A. & Trine Heinemann
2021. Are They Requests? An Exploration of Declaratives of Trouble in Service Encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:1 ► pp. 20 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.