Part of
Temporality in InteractionEdited by Arnulf Deppermann and Susanne Günthner
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 27] 2015
► pp. 27–56
Edited by Arnulf Deppermann and Susanne Günthner
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 27] 2015
► pp. 27–56
The temporality of language in interaction
projection and latency
This paper focuses on two basic principles in the dialogical emergence of self-contained linguistic units (‘sentences’) in interaction: projection and latency. Both are elementary for the synchronization of participants’ minds in what I call the online emergence of syntax. Projection enables speakers and recipients to predict – on the basis of what has been said so far – structural slots in the emergent syntactic gestalt. Latency, on the other hand, relates a new utterance to the structure of the preceding one(s). It links the structure of an emergent syntactic gestalt to that of previous, already complete syntactic gestalts. Projection and latency can easily be observed in mundane conversational phenomena that happen time and again in everyday interaction.
References
Altmann, G.T. and Y. Kamide
1999 “Incremental Interpretation at Verbs: Restricting the Domain of Subsequent Reference.” Cognition 73 (3): 247–264. 
Auer, Peter
1992 “The Neverending Sentence: On Rightward Expansion in Spoken Syntax.” In Studies in Spoken Languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric, ed. by Miklós Kontra and Tamas Váradi, 41–60. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
2000 “Online-Syntax – oder: Was es bedeuten könnte, die Zeitlichkeit der mündlichen Sprache ernst zu nehmen.” Sprache und Literatur 85: 43–56.
2009 “Online Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language.” Language Sciences 31: 1–13.
2005 “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text 25 (1): 7–36.
2014 “Sentences and their Symbiotic Guests. Notes on Analepsis from the Perspective of Online Syntax.” Pragmatics 24 (3): 533–560.
Birkner, Karin
2006 “(Relativ-)Konstruktionen zur Personenattribuierung: ‘ich bin n=mensch der…’.” In Konstruktionen in der Interaktion, ed. by Susanne Günthner and Wolfgang Imo, 205–237. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
1990 Le français parlé. Études grammaticales. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
Bock, Kathryn
1986 “Syntactic Persistence in Language Production.” Cognitive Psychology 18: 355–387.
Bockgård, Gustav
2004 Syntax som social resurs: En studie av samkonstruktionssekvensers form och funktion i svenska samtal
[Syntax as a Social Resource: A Study of Form and Function of Co-Construction Sequences in Swedish Conversation]
. Uppsala University, Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för nordiska språk vid Uppsala universitet.
Brenning, Jana
2013 Syntaktische Ko-Konstruktionen im gesprochenen Deutsch. Unpubl. PhD Thesis, U Freiburg.
Bybee, Joan
2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP.
Crocker, Matthew W
1999 “Mechanisms for Sentence Processing.” In Language Processing, ed. by Simon Garrod and Martin J. Pickering, 191–231. Hove: Psychology Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Y. Ono
(eds.) 2007 “Turn Continuation in Cross-Linguistic Perspective.” Special Issue of Pragmatics 17 (4).
Deppermann, Arnulf
2007 Grammatik und Semantik aus gesprächsanalytischer Sicht. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Du Bois, John W
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
forthc. “Towards a Dialogic Syntax.” To appear in a Special Issue of Cognitive Linguistics ed. by Rachel Giora and John W. Du Bois
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
2002 “Constituency and the Grammar of Turn Increments.” In The language of turn and sequence, ed. by Cecilia Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 14–38. Oxford: OUP.
Frazier, Lynn and Charles Clifton
1986 Construal. Cambridge: MIT.
1997 “Construal: Overview, Motivation, and Some New Evidence.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 26 (3): 277–295.
Goffman, Erving
1979 “Footing.” Semiotica 25 (1–2): 1–29.
Günthner, Susanne
Hale, John
2006 “Uncertainty about the Rest of the Sentence.” Cognitive Science 30: 643–672.
Hartmann, Peter
1959 “Offene Form, leere Form und Struktur.” In Sprache – Schlüssel zur Welt (FS Leo Weisgerber), ed. by Helmut Gipper, 146–157. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag.
Hayashi, Makoto
Imo, Wolfgang
2011 “Online Changes in Syntactic Gestalts in Spoken German.” In Constructions – Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer and Stefan Pfänder, 127–155. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Jackendoff, Ray
2008 “Construction after Construction and its Theoretical Challenges.” Language 84 (1): 8–28.
Jefferson, Gail
1983 “Notes on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap Onset.” Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 28. Tilburg: University of Tilburg.
1990 “List-Construction as a Task and a Resource.” In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–92. Washington, D. C.: UP America.
Kamide, Y., G.T. Altmann, and S. Haywood
2003 “The Time-Course of Prediction in Incremental Sentence Processing: Evidence from Anticipatory Eye Movements.” Journal of Memory and Language 49 (1): 133–156.
Lerner, Gene
1991 “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress.” Language in Society 20: 441–458.
1996 “On the ‘Semi-Permeable Character’ of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emmanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson, 238–276. Cambridge: CUP.
Levy, Roger
2011 “Probabilistic Linguistic Expectations, Uncertain Input, and Implications for Eye Movements in Reading.” Studies of Psychology and Behaviour 9 (1): 53–64.
Linell, Per
2005 The Written Language Bias in Linguistics. London: Routledge.
2009 Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Marschall, Matthias
1994 “Satzklammer und Textverstehen. Zur Funktion der Verbendstellung im Deutschen.” Deutsche Sprache, 310–330.
Marslen-Wilson, William, Lorraine K. Tyler, and Mark Seidenberg
1978 “Sentence Processing and the Clause Boundary.” In Studies in the Perception of Language, ed. by W.J.M. Levelt, & G.B. Flores d’Arcais, 119–246. Chicester: Wiley.
Marslen-Wilson, William and Lorraine Komisarjevsky Tyler
1980 “The Temporal Structure of Spoken Language Understanding.” Cognition 8: 1–71.
Nichols, Johanna
1986 “Head-Marking and Dependent-Marking Grammar.” Language 62 (1): 56–119.
Pritchett, Bradley L
1988 “Garden Path Phenomena and the Grammatical Basis of Language Processing.” Language 64: 539–576.
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
2000 “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language in Society 29: 1–63.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000 English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells. From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Schutz, Alfred and Thomas Luckmann
1973 Structures of the Life-World, Volume I. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP.
Szczepek, Beatrice
2000 “Functional Aspects of Collaborative Productions in English Conversation.” INLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structure) 21, URL: [URL].
Schegloff, Emanuel
1987 “Recycled Turn Beginnings.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button and John R.E. Lee, 70–85. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2015. Grammar and Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: CUP.
Uhmann, Susanne
1991 Fokusphonologie: eine Analyse deutscher Intonationskonturen im Rahmen der nicht-linearen Phonologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Cited by
Cited by 18 other publications
Auer, Peter & Jan Lindström
2021. On agency and affiliation in second assessments. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 81 ff. 
Béguelin, Marie-José & Gilles Corminboeuf
2016. Phénomènes d’attente et de projection : présentation. Langue française N° 192:4 ► pp. 5 ff.
Chen, Helen Kai-Yun & Chiu-yu Tseng
Corminboeuf, Gilles & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2016. La projection en macro-syntaxe et en linguistique interactionnelle : dimensions théoriques et empiriques. Langue française N° 192:4 ► pp. 15 ff.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson
De Stefani, Elwys & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2017. Une étude interactionnelle de la grammaire : la dislocation à droite évaluative dans la parole-en-interaction. Revue française de linguistique appliquée Vol. XXII:2 ► pp. 15 ff.
Duvallon, Outi & Il-Il Yatziv-Malibert
2023. Prolongements de la notion de paradigme : outil descriptif et théorique au-delà du français parlé. Travaux de linguistique n° 84-85:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Ehmer, Oliver & Daniel Mandel
2021. Projecting action spaces. On the interactional relevance of cesural areas in co-enactments. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 638 ff.
Goria, Eugenio & Francesca Masini
2021. Chapter 4. Category-building lists between grammar and interaction. In Building Categories in Interaction [Studies in Language Companion Series, 220], ► pp. 73 ff.
Greer, Tim
2023. Grammar-in-Interaction and its place in assessing interactional competence. Applied Pragmatics 5:2 ► pp. 202 ff.
GREER, TIM & ZACHARY NANBU
2022. Visualizing Emergent Turn Construction: Seeing Writing While Speaking. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Haselow, Alexander
2016. Intensifying adverbs ‘outside the clause’. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 379 ff.
Helmer, Henrike
2017. Analepsen mit Topik-Drop. Zur Notwendigkeit einer diskurssemantischen Perspektive. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 45:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hopper, Paul J.
2021. “You turn your back and there’s somebody moving in”. Interactional Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 64 ff.
Neveu, Franck, Audrey Roig & Dan Van Raemdonck
2017. Détachement, corrélation. Travaux de linguistique n° 74:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Reber, Elisabeth
2021.
On the variation of fragmental constructions in British English and American English post-match interviews. Sociolinguistica 35:1 ► pp. 217 ff.
Reich, Uli
2016. Psychoanalyse und Linguistik: Chancen einer gefährlichen Liebschaft. In Austauschprozesse: Psychoanalyse und andere Humanwissenschaften, ► pp. 291 ff.
Zinken, Jörg & Uwe-A. Küttner
2022. Offering an Interpretation of Prior Talk in Everyday Interaction: A Semantic Map Approach. Discourse Processes 59:4 ► pp. 298 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.