Part of
Imperative Turns at Talk: The design of directives in action
Edited by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 30] 2017
► pp. 241270
References (26)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2010. Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2014. “Benefactors and Beneficiaries. Benefactive Status and Stance in the Management of Offers and Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 51–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2001. “Interactional Prosody: High Onsets in Reason-for-the-Call Turns.” Language in Society 30: 29–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Marja Etelämäki. 2014. “On Divisions of Labor in Request and Offer Environments.” In Requesting in Social Interaction. Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 115–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Curl, Traci. 2006. “Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1257–1280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Bert Cornillie, and Paola Pietrandrea (eds). 2013. Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duvallon, Outi, and Rea Peltola. Forthcoming. “Deontic readings of the imperative through the prism of force dynamic relations: Permissive and preventive utterances with the discourse marker vaa(n) in Finnish”.
Hakulinen, Auli. 1998. “The Use of Finnish Nyt as a Discourse Particle.” In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, ed. by Andreas Jucker, and Yael Ziv, 83–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “The word ny(t) as an Adverb and a Particle in Finnish.” In NU/NÅ: A family of Discourse Markers across the Languages of Europe and Beyond, ed. by Peter Auer, and Yael Maschler, 281–319. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi [The Comprehensive Grammar of Finnish]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Lauri. 1999 [1951]. Luennot suomen kielen partikkeleista [Lectures on particles in Finnish language]. ed. by Yrjö Lauranto, and Tapani Lehtinen. Helsinki: Department of Finnish language, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press/Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jary, Mark, and Mikhail Kissine. 2014. Imperatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. “Notes on Some Orderliness of Overlap Onset.” In Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric, ed. by V. D’Urso, and P. Leonardi, 11–38. Padua, Italy: Cleup Editore.Google Scholar
Lauranto, Yrjö. 2014. Imperatiivi, KÄSKY, direktiivi. Arkikeskustelun vaihtokauppakielioppia [Imperative, command, directive. Grammar of exchange in everyday conversation]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva 2012. “Syntactically Non-integrated Finnish jos ‘if’-Conditional Clauses as Directives.” Discourse Processes 49: 3–4, 213–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Jan, Camilla Lindholm, and Ritva Laury. 2016. “The Interactional Emergence of Conditional Clauses as Directives: Constructions, Trajectories and Sequences of Actions.” Language Sciences 58: 8–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raevaara, Liisa. 1989. ” No – vuoronalkuinen partikkeli [ No – turn-initial particle].” In Suomalaisen keskustelun keinoja I, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, 147–161. Kieli 4. Helsinki: Department of Finnish Language, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Volumes I and II. ed. by Gail Jefferson.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001. Responding in Conversation. A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Heidi Vepsäläinen. 2016. “The Finnish particle no .” In NU/NÅ: A Family of Discourse Markers across the Languages of Europe and Beyond, ed. by Yael Maschler, and Peter Auer. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano. 2010. “Mobilizing responseResearch on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wootton, Anthony. 1997. Interaction and the Development of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg. 2016. Requesting Responsibility. The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. New York: Oxford University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Kim, Mary Shin
2023. Korean imperatives at two different speech levels. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:4  pp. 559 ff. DOI logo
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Marja Etelämäki & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2021. Directive turn design and intersubjectivity. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326],  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Siitonen, Pauliina, Mirka Rauniomaa & Tiina Keisanen
2021. Language and the Moving Body: Directive Actions With the Finnish kato “look” in Nature-Related Activities. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Golato, Peter
2020. Chapter 4. Recruitments in French. In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33],  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.