Chapter published in:
Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages
Edited by John Heritage and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 31] 2018
► pp. 225250


Bańko, Mirosław
2000Inny Słownik Języka Polskiego [A Different Dictionary of Polish]. Warsaw: PWN.¨Google Scholar
Beach, Wayne A.
1993"Transitional Regularities for Casual 'okay' Usages." Journal of Pragmatics 19:325–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Betz, Emma, and Andrea Golato
2008"Remembering Relevant Information and Witholding Relevant next Actions: The German Token 'achja'." Research on Language and Social Interaction 41:58–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina B.
2016"The Discourse Marker Nu in Russian Conversation." In NU/NÅ: A Family of Discourse Markers across the Languages of Europe and Beyond, ed. by Peter Auer, and Yael Maschler, 48–80. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E.
2002"Sequence and Solidarity." In Advances in Group Processes: Group Cohesion, Trust and Solidarity, ed. by Edward J. Lawler, and Shane R. Thye, 229–253. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Doroszewski, Witold
1999Słownik Języka Polskiego [Dictionary of Polish]. Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
2009""Quit Talking while I’m Interrupting:" A Comparison between Positions of Overlap Onset in Conversation." In Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 70–93. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Dunaj, Bogusław
1996Słownik Współczesnego Języka Polskiego [Dictionary of Contemporary Polish]. Warsaw: Wilga.Google Scholar
Duszak, Anna
1982'Topical Sentence Positions in English and Polish" In 18th International Conference on English-Polish Contrastive Lingustics, Błażejewko.
Emmertsen, Sofie, and Trine Heinemann
2010"Realization as Device for Remedying Problems of Affiliation in Interaction." Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43 (2):109–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Golato, Andrea, and Zsuzsanna Fagyal
2008"Comparing Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Token 'ja' and the Role of Prosody: A Conversation Analytic Perspective." Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41 (3):241–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Jo Ann
1978"Amplitude Shift. A Mechanism for the Affiliation of Utterances in Conversational Interaction." In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 199–218. New York: Academic.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, 233–292. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1988"Explanations as Accounts: A Conversation Analytic Perspective." In Understanding Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods, ed. by Charles Antaki, 127–144. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
1998"'Oh'-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry." Language in Society 27 (3):291–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002"'Oh'-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement." In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra Thompson, 196–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007"Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in References to Persons (and Places)." In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by Nick J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 255–208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012a"The Epistemic Engine: Action Formation, Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge." Research on Language and Social Interaction 45:25–50.Google Scholar
2012b"Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge." Research on Language & Social Interaction 45:1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013"Action Formation and Its Epistemic (and Other) Backgrounds." Discourse Studies 15 (5):551–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven E. Clayman
2010Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1983aTwo Papers on 'Transitory Recipientship': Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on Recipient Topic-shift Implicature; Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgement Tokens 'yeah' and 'mm hm'. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 30: University of Tilburg, Tilburg, Netherlands.
1983bTwo Explorations of the Organization of Overlapping Talk in Conversation: 'Notes on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap Onset' and 'On a Failed Hypothesis: 'Conjunctionals' as Overlap-Vulnerable'. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 28: University of Tilburg, Tilburg, Netherlands.
1990"List Construction as a Task and Interactional Resource." In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–92. Lanham MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
2004"Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction." In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, and John Lee
1992“The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles-Telling’ and a ‘Service Encounter’”. In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 521–548. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1987"Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy." In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2010"Social Action of Syntactic Reduplication." Journal of Pragmatics 42:800–824.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino
2013"On the Preference for Remembering: Acknowledging an Answer with Finnish 'ai nii(n)' (“oh that's right”)." Research on Language & Social Interaction 46 (3):277–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014"Utterances Ending in the Conjunction 'että'. Complete or to Be Continued?" In Contexts of Subordination: Cognitive, Typological and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski, and Helena Sorva, 223–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015"Displaying Now-understanding: The Finnish Change-of-state Token 'aa'." Discourse Processes 52 (2):111–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kryk, Barbara
1992"The Pragmatics of Interjections: The Case of Polish 'no'." Journal of Pragmatics 18 (2–3):193–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael
2003"The Discourse Marker 'nu': Israeli Hebrew Impatience in Interaction." Text 23 (1):89–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pisarkowa, Krystyna
1975Skladnia Rozmowy Telefonicznej [The Syntax of Polish Telephone Conversation]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy Imiania Ossolińskich Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita M.
1980"Telling My Side: 'Limited Access' as a 'Fishing Device''. Sociological Inquiry 50:186–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomeranzt, Anita M.
1984"Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes." In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey
2014"What “What?” Tells Us about How Conversationalists Manage Intersubjectivity." Research on Language and Social Interaction 47 (2):109–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1979"Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons and Their Interaction." In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1992"Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided for Place for the Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation." American Journal of Sociology 95 (5):1295–1345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996"Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics." In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011"Word Repeats as Unit Ends." Discourse Studies 13 (3):367–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
2001Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002"Recipient Activities: The Particle 'no' as a Go-Ahead Response in Finnish Conversations." In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 165–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2005"Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position." Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (2):131–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007"Alternative Recognitionals in Initial References to Persons." In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, ed. by Nick Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 73–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2011"Morality and Question Design: "Of course" as Contesting a Presupposition of Askability." In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 82–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szulc-Brzozowska, Magdalena
2010"Zur semantisch-pragmatischen Erweiterung der Abtönungsfuntion bei polnischen Modalpartikeln aus kontrastiver Sicht (Deutsch - Polnisch) [On a semantic-pragmatic extension of the Polish modal particles from a contrastive perspective (German-Polish)]." Linguistik online 44 4/2010, accessed 15/09/2011.Google Scholar
Szymczak, Mirosław
1978–1981Słownik Języka Polskiego [Dictionary of Polish]. Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
Weidner, Matylda
2016"Aha-moments in Interaction: Indexing a Change of State in Polish." Journal of Pragmatics 104:193–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1976"Particles and Linguistic Relativity." International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1 (2–3):327–367.Google Scholar