Chapter published in:
Mobilizing Others: Grammar and lexis within larger activities
Edited by Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Emma Betz and Peter Golato
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 33] 2020
► pp. 118
References

References

Barske, Tobias, and Andrea Golato
2010 “German so: Managing Sequence and Action.” Text & Talk 30 (3): 245–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beach, Wayne A.
1995 “Preserving and Constraining Options: ‘Okays’ and ‘Official’ Priorities in Medical Interviews.” In The Talk of the Clinic: Explorations in the Analysis of Medical and Therapeutic Discourse, ed. by G. H. Morris, and Ronald Chenail, 259–289. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Broth, Mathias, and Leelo Keevallik
2014 “Getting Ready to Move as a Couple: Accomplishing Mobile Formations in a Dance Class.” Space and Culture 17 (2): 107–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014 “What does Grammar Tell us about Action?Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci, and Paul Drew
2008 “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Judy
1984 “Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 102–128. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2018a “Instruction Practices in German Driving Lessons: Differential uses of Declaratives and Imperatives.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28 (2): 265–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018b “Changes in Turn Design over Interactional Histories – the Case of Instructions in Driving School Lessons.” In Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Jürgen Streeck, 293–324. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Susanne Günthner
2015Temporality in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Jürgen Streeck
2018 “The Body in Interaction: Its Multiple Modalities and Temporalities.” In Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Jürgen Streeck, 1–29. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
2013 “Conversation Analysis and Social Action.” Journal of Foreign Languages 37 (3): 1–20.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2014 “Requesting – from speech act to recruitment.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–34. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Kobin Kendrick
2018 “Searching for Trouble: Recruiting Assistance through Embodied Action.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 1 (1): 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J.
2014 “Human Agency and the Infrastructure of Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 35–54. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, Giovanni Rossi, and Nick J. Enfield
Eds. in print Getting Others to do Things: A Pragmatic Typology of Recruitments Berlin Language Science Press
Fox, Barbara, and Trine Heinemann
2015 “The Alignment of Manual and Verbal Displays in Requests for the Repair of an Object.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (3): 342–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Rethinking Format: an Examination of Requests.” Language in Society 45: 499–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Issues in Action Formation: Requests and the Problem with x.” Open Linguistics 3 (1): 31–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “Telescoping Responses to Requests: Unpacking Progressivity.” Discourse Studies 21 (1): 38–66.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Virginia Teas, Timothy Halkowski, and Felicia Roberts
2001 “Accomplishing a Request without Making One: A Single Case Analysis of a Primary Care Visit.” Text & Talk 21 (1/2): 55–81.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine
2017 “Transitioning Between Activities with the Danish Change-of-State Token nå .” Journal of Pragmatics 118: 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2016 “The Recruitment Matrix.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 27–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
1994 “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23 (1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1988 “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35 (4): 418–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Talking about Troubles in Conversation, ed. by Paul Drew, John Heritage, Gene Lerner, and Anita Pomerantz. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, and John Lee
1980 “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” End of grant report to the (British) Social Science Research Council on the analysis of conversations in which ‘troubles’ and ‘anxieties’ are expressed (Ref. HR 4802).
Keevallik, Leelo
2010 “Marking Boundaries Between Activities: The Particle nii in Estonian. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (2): 157–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin, and Paul Drew
2016 “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49: 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “The Putative Preference for Offers over Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 87–113. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene
1995 “Turn Design and the Organization of Participation in Instructional Activities.” Discourse Processes 19 (1): 111–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1979 “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17 (5–6): 365–399.Google Scholar
2012 “Action Formation and Ascription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Xiaoting
2019 “Negotiating Activity Closings with Head Nods in Mandarin Conversation.” In Embodied Activities in Face-to-Face and Mediated Settings: Social Encounters in Time and Space, ed. by Elisabeth Reber, and Cornelia Gerhardt, 369–396. London: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna
1999Language as Social Action: Grammar, Prosody and Interaction in Swedish Conversation. Uppsala: Institutionen för Nordiska Spräk vid Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
2005 “Language as Social Action: A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per, and Daniel Thunquist
2003 “Moving in and out of Framings: Activity Contexts in Talks with Young Unemployed People within a Training Project.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 409–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie
2016 “The Positionally Sensitive Workings of the Dutch Particle nou .” In NU/NÅ: A Family of Discourse Markers Across the Languages of Europe and Beyond, ed. by Peter Auer, and Yael Maschler, 377–408. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “Activities as Discrete Organizational Domains: Social Encounters in Time and Space.” In Embodied Activities in Face-to-Face and Mediated Settings: Social Encounters in Time and Space, ed. by Elisabeth Reber, and Cornelia Gerhardt, 29–61. London: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, Marvin
1975 “A Framework for Representing Knowledge.” In The Psychology of Computer Vision, ed. by Patrick H. Winston, 211–277. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2014 “The Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Challenges of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social Interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 20 (3): 336–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice
2006 “Making Sequentiality Salient: And-Prefacing in the Talk of Airline Pilots.” Discourse Studies 8 (2): 279–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Action in Time: Ensuring Timeliness for Collaborative Work in the Airline Cockpit.” Language in Society 36 (2): 233–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okada, Misao
2018 “Imperative Actions in Boxing Sparring Sessions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 67–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raevaara, Liisa
2017 “Adjusting the Design of Directives to the Activity Environment: Imperatives in Finnish Cooking Club Interaction.” In Imperative Turns-at-Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 381–410. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rauniomaa, Mirka
2017 “Assigning Roles and Responsibilities.” In Imperative Turns-at-Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 325–355. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
2003 “An Interactional Structure of Medical Activities during Acute Visits and its Implications for Patients’ Participation.” Health Communication, 15: 27–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Overall Structural Organization.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 257–280. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D., and Tanya Stivers
2001 “Achieving Activity Transitions in Physician-Patient Encounters: From History-Taking to Physical Examination. Human Communication Research 27 (2): 253–298.Google Scholar
Rossano, Federico, and Katja Liebal
2014 “ ‘Requests’ and ‘Offers’ in Orangutans and Human Infants.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 335–364. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni
2012 “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49: 426–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “When do People not use Language to Make Requests?” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 303–334. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2017 “Secondary and Deviant Uses of the Imperative for Requesting.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 103–137. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Composite Social Actions: The Case of Factual Declaratives in Everyday Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (4): 379–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni, and Jörg Zinken
2016 “Grammar and Social Agency: The Pragmatics of Impersonal Deontic Statements.” Language 92 (4): e296–e325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on Conversation (Vol. I and II), ed. by Harvey Sacks, Gail Jefferson, and Emanuel Schegloff. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütz, Alfred
1971 [1945] “On multiple realities.” In Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, 207–259. Den Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2017aImperative Turns-at-Talk: The Design of Directives in Action. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017b “Imperative Turns at Talk: An Introduction.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa
2011 “Participants’ Deontic Rights and Action Formation: The Case of Declarative Requests for Action.” Interaction and Linguistic Structures 52. (http://​www​.inlist​.uni​-bayreuth​.de/)
Streeck, Jürgen, and J. Scott Jordan
2009 “Projection and Anticipation: The Forward-Looking Nature of Embodied Communication.” Discourse Processes 46 (2–3): 93–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen
2005 “ ‘Contingent Requests’: Their Sequential Organization and Turn Shape.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (2): 159–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Request Sequences: The Intersection of Grammar, Interaction and Social Context. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jenny
1995Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra, Barbara Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2015Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg
2015 “Contingent Control over Shared Goods. ‘Can I Have x’ Requests in British English Informal Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 82: 23–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Requesting Responsibility. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Arnulf Deppermann
2017 “A Cline of Visible Commitment in the Situated Design of Imperative Turns. Evidence from German and Polish.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 27–63. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Eva Ogiermann
2013 “Responsibility and Action: Object Requests in English and Polish Everyday Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (3): 256–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Giovanni Rossi
2016 “Assistance and Other Forms of Cooperative Engagement.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 20–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar