Drawing on video-recorded violin lessons as data, the
article describes the violin teacher’s use of Finnish second-person
declarative and interrogative directives in mobilizing student compliance.
The data show that the declarative directives are regularly used when (1)
the student is already engaged in the task at hand and (2) the nominated
actions concern the basics of violin playing. The paper argues that these
directives are thus not only about mobilizing recipient action locally but
also about establishing normatively-desired behavior more generally. The
interrogative directives, then again, are typically used when (1) there has
been a momentary shortcoming in the student’s prior behavior and (2) the
nominated action is a one-time accomplishment facilitating the smooth
unfolding of the instructional encounter.
Antaki, Charles, Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, and Mark Rapley
2000 “ ‘Brilliant.
Next Question…’: High-Grade Assessment Sequences in the Completion
of Interactional Units.” Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 33: 235–262.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1987 “Indirectness
and Politeness in Requests: Same or
Different.” Journal of
Pragmatics 11: 131–146.
Broth, Mathias, Jakob Cromdal, and Lena Levin
2017 “Starting
Out as a Driver: Progression in Instructed Pedal
Work. In Memory
Practices and Learning: Interactional, Institutional and
Sociocultural Perspectives, ed.
by Åsa Mäkitalo, Per Linell, and R. Säljö, 113–142. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Broth, Mathias, and Leelo Keevallik
2014 “Getting
Ready to Move as a Couple: Accomplishing Mobile Formations in a
Dance Class.” Space and
Culture 17: 107–121.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987
[1978]Politeness: Some Universals in
Language
Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caffi, Claudia
1999 “On
Mitigation.” Journal of
Pragmatics 31: 881–909.
Clark, Herbert H.
1979 “Responding
to Indirect Speech Acts.” Cognitive
Psychology 11: 430–477.
Clift, Rebecca
2016Conversation
Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter
2010 “Directives:
Entitlement and Contingency in
Action.” Discourse
Studies 12: 419–442.
Curl, Tracy S., and Paul Drew
2008 “Contingency
and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of
Requesting.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 41: 129–153.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2015 “When
Recipient Design Fails: Egocentric Turn-Design of Instructions in
Driving School Lessons Leading to Breakdowns of
Intersubjectivity. Gesprächsforschung 16: 63–101.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2018 “Instruction
Practices in German Driving Lessons: Differential Uses of
Declaratives and
Imperatives.” International Journal
of Applied
Linguistics: 1–18.
De Stefani, Elwys, and Anne-Danièle Gazin
2014 “Instructional
Sequences in Driving Lessons: Mobile Participants and the Temporal
and Sequential Organization of
Actions. Journal of
Pragmatics 65: 63–79.
Eelen, Gino
2001A
Critique of Politeness
Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome’s.
Ekberg, Katie, and Amanda LeCouteur
2015 “Clients’
Resistance to Therapists’ Proposals: Managing Epistemic and Deontic
Status.” Journal of
Pragmatics 90: 12–25.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1976 “Is
Sybil There? The Structure of Some American English
Directives. Language in
Society 5: 25–66.
2009The
body made flesh: embodied learning and the corporeal
device. British Journal of Sociology
of
Education 30: 391–406.
Fraser, Bruce
1980 “Conversational
Mitigation.” Journal of
Pragmatics 4: 341–350.
Fraser, Bruce
1990 “Perspectives
on Politeness.” Journal of
Pragmatics 14: 219–236.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Asta Cekaite
2013 “Calibration
in Directive/Response Sequences in Family
Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 46: 122–138.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Asta Cekaite
2014 “Orchestrating
Directive Trajectories in Communicative Projects in Family
Interaction.” In Requesting
in Social Interaction, ed.
by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Paul Drew, 185–214. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho
2004Iso suomen kielioppi [The Comprehensive Grammar of
Finnish]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel
and
Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hindmarsh, Jon, Lewis Hyland, and Avijit Banerjee
2014 “Work
to Make Simulation Work: “Realism,” Instructional Correction and the
Body in Training.” Discourse
Studies, 16: 247–269.
House, Juliane, and Gabriele Kasper
1981 “Politeness
Markers in English and
German.” In Conversational
Routines: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and
Prepatterned Speech, ed.
by Florian Coulmas, 157–185. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jary, Mark, and Mikhail Kissine
2014Imperatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Keevallik, L.
2010Bodily
quoting in dance correction. Research
on Language and Social
Interaction, 43(4): 401–426.
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew
2016 “Recruitment:
Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in
Interaction.” Research on Language
and Social
Interaction 49: 1–19.
Kent, Alexandra
2012 “Responding
to Directives: What Can Children Do When a Parent Tells Them What to
Do?” In Disputes
in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young
People, ed. by Maryanne Theobold, and Susan Danby, 57–84. Bingley, UK: Emerald Books.
Kent, Alexandra, and Kobin H. Kendrick
2016 “Imperative
Directives: Orientations to
Accountability.” Research on Language
and Social
Interaction 49: 272–288.
Lakoff, Robin
1973 “The
Logic of Politeness: Or, Minding Your P’s and
Q’s.” In Proceedings
of the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic
Society, 292–305.
Landmark, Anne Marie Dalby, Pål Gulbrandsen, and Jan Svennevig
2015 “Whose
Decision? Negotiating Epistemic and Deontic Rights in Medical
Treatment Decisions.” Journal of
Pragmatics 78: 54–69.
Lappalainen, Hanna
2008 “Kelan virkailijoiden henkilötunnuspyynnöt: Tutkimus
rutiininomaisista toiminnoista. [Asking for Clients’ Identity Number or Identity Card
at Finnish Social Security offices: A Study of Routinized
Activities.]” Virittäjä 112: 483–517.
Lerner, Gene H.
1995 “Turn
Design and the Organization of Participation in Instructional
Activities.” Discourse
Processes 19: 111–131.
Lindström, Anna, and Ann Weatherall
2015 “Orientations
to Epistemics and Deontics in Treatment
Discussions.” Journal of
Pragmatics 78: 39–53.
Macbeth, Douglas H.
1991 “Teacher
Authority as Practical
Action.” Linguistics and
Education 3: 281–313.
McHoul, Alexander
1978 “The
Organization of Turns at Formal Talk in the
Classroom.” Language in
Society 7: 183–213.
Mehan, Hugh
1979Learning
Lessons: Social Organization in the
Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Merlino, Sara
2014 “Singing
in ‘Another’ Language: How Pronunciation Matters in the Organisation
of Choral Rehearsals.” Social
Semiotics 24: 420–445.
Mills, Sara
2003Gender
and
Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mondada, Lorenza
2014 “Requesting
Immediate Action in the Surgical Operating Room: Time, Embodied
Resources and Praxeological
Embeddedness.” In Requesting
in Social Interaction, ed.
by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 269–302. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Nevile, Maurice
2004 “Integrity
in the Airline Cockpit: Embodying Claims about Progress for the
Conduct of an Approach
Briefing.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 37: 447–480.
Nishizaka, Aug
2006 “What
to learn: The embodied structure of the
environment.” Research on Language
and Social
Interaction 39: 119–154.
Parton, Katharine
2014Epistemic
stance in orchestral
interaction. Social
Semiotics 24: 402–419.
Psathas, George
1995Conversation
Analysis: The Study of
Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Reed, Darren, and Beatrice Szczepek Reed
2014 “The
Emergence of Learnables in Music
Masterclasses.” Social
Semiotics 24: 446–467.
Rossi, Giovanni
2012 “Bilateral
and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X?
Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse
Processes 49: 426–458.
Rouhikoski, Anu
2015 ”Laita, laitatko vai laitat? Kolmen direktiivirakenteen
variaatio
asiakaspalvelutilanteessa. [Imperative, Interrogative or 2nd-Person Declarative?
Variation of Three Directive Constructions in Service
Encounters].” Virittäjä 2(2015): 189–222.
Sahlström, J. Fritjof
2002 “The
Interactional Organization of Hand Raising in Classroom
Interaction.” The Journal of
Classroom
Interaction 37: 47–57.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007Sequence
Organization in Interaction: A primer in Conversation
Analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R.
1976 “A
Classification of Illocutionary
Acts.” Language in
Society 5: 1–23.
Sidnell, Jack, and Tanya Stivers
(eds)2013Handbook
of Conversation
Analysis. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sidnell, Jack
2010Conversation
Analysis: An
Introduction. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Silverstein, Michael
2010 “ ‘Direct’
and ‘Indirect’ Communicative Acts in Semiotic
Perspective.” Journal of
Pragmatics 42: 337–353.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
2001 “Lääkärin ohjeet. [Doctor’s
Instructions].” In Keskustelu lääkärin
vastaanotolla [Conversation during doctor’s
consultation], ed.
by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Anssi Peräkylä, and Kari Eskola, 89–111. Tampere: Vastapaino.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Liisa Raevaara, and Hanna Lappalainen
2009 ”’Mä otan tän’. Käynnin syyn esittämisen tavat
kioskilla. [‘I’ll
have this’. Presenting one’s reason for the visit at convenience
store].” In Kieli kioskilla: Tutkimuksia kioskiasioinnin
rutiineista. [Talk at
Convenience Store. Studies on the Routines in Convenience Store
Encounters], ed.
by Hanna Lappalainen, and Liisa Raevaara, 90–119. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Heidi Vepsäläinen
2016 “The
Finnish
No.” In NU
and NÅ: A Family of Discourse Markers Across the Languages of Europe
and Beyond, ed. by Peter Auer, and Yael Maschler, 243–280. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2017Imperative
turns at talk: An
introduction. In Imperative
turns at talk: The design of directives in
action, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Stevanovic, Melisa
2011 “Participants’
Deontic Rights and Action Formation: The Case of Declarative
Requests for Action.” Interaction and
Linguistic Structures
(InLiSt) 52. [URL]
2016 “On
the Hierarchy of Interactional Resources: Embodied and Verbal
Behavior in the Management of Joint Activities with Material
Objects.” Journal of
Pragmatics 103: 15–32.
2018 “Social
deontics: A nano-level approach to human power
play.” Journal for the Theory of
Social Behaviour.
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
2006 “A
Preference for Progressivity in
Interaction.” Language in
Society 35: 367–392.
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2010 “Mobilising
Response.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 43: 3–31.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice, Darren Reed, and Elizabeth Haddon
2013 “NOW
or NOT NOW: Coordinating Restarts in the Pursuits of Learnables in
Vocal Masterclasses.” Research on
Language and Social
Interaction 46: 22–46.
Veronesi, Daniela
2014 “Correction
Sequences and Semiotic Resources in Ensemble Music Workshops: The
Case of Conduction®.” Social
Semiotics 24: 468–494.
Watts, Richard
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weeks, Peter
1996A
Rehearsal of a Beethoven Passage: An Analysis of Correction
Talk. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 29: 247–290.
West, Candace
1990 “Not
Just ‘Doctors’ Orders’: Directive-Response Sequences in Patients’
Visits to Women and Men
Physicians.” Discourse and
Society 1: 85–112.
Wootton, Anthony J.
1997Interaction
and the Development of
Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yli-Vakkuri, Valma
1986Suomen kieliopillisten muotojen toissijainen
käyttö. [Secondary Uses
of Finnish Grammatical
Forms]. Publications of the Department
of Finnish and General Linguistics
28. Turku: University of Turku.
Zemel, Alan, and Timothy Koschmann
2011 “Pursuing
a Question: Reinitiating IRE Sequences as a Method of
Instruction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 43: 475–488.
Zinken, Jörg, and Eva Ogiermann
2011 “How
to Propose an Action as Objectively Necessary: The Case of Polish
Trzeba X (“One Needs to
X”).” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 44: 263–287.
Zinken, Jörg, and Giovanni Rossi
2016 “Assistance
and Other Forms of Cooperative
Engagement.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 49: 20–26.
Zinken, Jörg, and Eva Ogiermann
2013 “Responsibility
and Action: Invariants and Diversity in Requests for Objects in
British English and Polish
Interaction.” Research on Language
and Social
Interaction 46: 256–276.
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Messner, Monika
2022. “Abbiamo detto con te no che tu hai ta da di da dim (Moves Right Hand on the Beat)”—The Interplay of Semiotic Modes in Chamber Music Lessons Under a Multimodal and Interactional Perspective. Frontiers in Communication 7
Montiegel, Kristella
2022. Teachers’ gestures for building listening and spoken language skills. Discourse Processes 59:10 ► pp. 771 ff.
Stevanovic, Melisa
2021. Monitoring and evaluating body knowledge: metaphors and metonymies of body position in children’s music instrument instruction. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s4
Stevanovic, Melisa
2021. Three Multimodal Action Packages in Responses to Proposals During Joint Decision-Making: The Embodied Delivery of Positive Assessments Including the Finnish Particle Ihan “Quite”. Frontiers in Communication 6
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2023. ‘Go on keep going’: The instruction of sustained embodied activities. Discourse Studies 25:5 ► pp. 692 ff.
Vatanen, Anna
2023. Embodied Noticings as Repair Initiations: On Multiactivity in Choir Rehearsals. In Complexity of Interaction, ► pp. 99 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.