Cover not available
Part of
Mobilizing Others: Grammar and lexis within larger activities
Edited by Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm, Emma Betz and Peter Golato
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 33] 2020
► pp. 175–202

Chapter 7
Multimodal mechanisms for mobilizing students to give pre-structured responses in French L2 classroom interaction

| Boston University

This study examines interactions in French L2 university classroom discourse from a multimodal conversation analytic (CA) perspective. In these interactions, a teacher mobilizes students to respond, then evaluates and subsequently reveals their responses on digital slides as a ratification of correct responses. As the co-participants build a joint interactional history with this task, the teacher becomes increasingly more reliant on embodied orientations toward the computer displaying the slides, thereby helping to both manage and transition between sequences of interaction. The findings provide insights into how the multimodal management of pedagogical artifacts, such as digital slides, can work to mobilize, evaluate and create interactional space for students to respond in teacher-led interaction.

Keywords: Conversation Analysis (CA), classroom discourse, mobilizing others to respond, digital slides, French, L2 instruction, multimodality, IRE sequences, embodiment, pedagogical artifacts
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
    • Response elicitation
    • Embodiment, object management, and mobilizing others to act
    • Interactional competence and interactional histories
  • Data
  • A role for digital slides in the ratification of student responses and in mobilizing students to respond
  • Increasingly implicit and embodied means of response elicitation
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 13 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33.07cha
References
Antaki, Charles
2002 ““Lovely”: Turn-Initial High Grade Assessments in Telephone Closings.” Discourse Studies 4 (1): 5–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cekaite, Asta
2007 “A Child’s Development of Interactional Competence in a Swedish L2 Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 91 (1): 45–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Soliciting Teacher Attention in an L2 Classroom: Affect Displays, Classroom Artefacts, and Embodied Action.” Applied Linguistics 30 (1): 26–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Collaborative Corrections with Spelling Control: Digital Resources and Peer Assistance.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4 (3):319–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2018a “Instruction Practices in German Driving Lessons: Differential Uses of Declaratives and Imperatives.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28: 265–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018b “Changes in Turn Design over Interactional Histories – the Case of Instructions in Driving School Lessons.” In Time in embodied interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Jürgen Streeck, 293–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, Søren W.
2012 “L2 Negation Constructions at Work.” Language Learning 62 (2): 335–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, Søren W., and Johannes Wagner
2015 “Embodied L2 Construction Learning.” Language Learning 65 (2): 268–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, Alan, and Johannes Wagner
1997 “On Discourse, Communication, and (Some) Fundamental Concepts in SLA research.” The Modern Language Journal 81 (3): 285–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Rod
2004 “On Delaying the Answer: Question Sequences Extended After the Question.” In Second Language Conversations, ed. by Rod Gardner, and Johannes Wagner, 246–266. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1981 Conversational Organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1986 “Gestures as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation.” Semiotica 62 (1/2): 29–49.Google Scholar
1996 “Transparent Vision.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thomson, 370–404. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse & Society 18:53–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “The Co-operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 8–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Co-operative Action. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
1995 “Co-construction in Girls’ Hopscotch.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (3): 261–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Joan Kelly, and Simona Pekarek Doehler
2011 “L2 Interactional Competence and Development (Chapter 1).” In L2 interactional competence and development, ed. by Joan Kelly Hall, John Hellermann, and Simona Pekarek-Doehler, 1–15. Bristol UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
1997 “Alors and Donc in Spoken French: A Reanalysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 28 (2): 153–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Eric
2017 “Learning and the Immediate Use (fulness) of a New Vocabulary Item.” The Modern Language Journal 101 (4): 712–728.Google Scholar
Heath, Christian, and Paul Luff
2013 “Embodied Action and Organisational Interaction: Establishing Contact on the Strike of a Hammer.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 24–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellermann, John
2003 “The Interactive Work of Prosody in the IRF Exchange: Teacher Repetition in Feedback Moves.” Language in Society 32:79–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Social Actions for Classroom Language Learning. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters Ltd.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change-of-state Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1980 “On “Trouble-Premonitory” Response to Inquiry.” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 153–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 125:13–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kääntä, Leila
2010 “Teacher Turn-Allocation and Repair Practices in Classroom Interaction.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Humanities, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
2014 “From Noticing to Initiating Correction: Students’ Epistemic Displays in Instructional Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 66: 86–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1986 “Some Reasons for Studying Gesture.” Semiotica 62 (1–2): 3–28.Google Scholar
1995 “Gestures as Illocutionary and Discourse Structure Markers in Southern Italian Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 23 (3): 247–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koschmann, Timothy
2013 “Conversation Analysis and Collaborative Learning.” The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning: 149–167.Google Scholar
Kramsch, Claire
1986 “From Language Proficiency to Interactional Competence.” The Modern Language Journal 70 (4): 366–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, Michael, and Charlene Sato
1983 “Classroom Foreigner Talk Discourse: Forms and Functions of Teachers’ Questions.” In Classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition, ed. by Herbert Selinger, and Michael Long, 268–285. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Macbeth, Douglas
2000 “Classrooms as Installations: Direct Instruction in the Early Grades.” In Local Educational Order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action, ed. by Stephen Hester, and David Francis, 21–71. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margutti, Piera
2004 “Classroom Interaction in an Italian Primary School: Instructional Sequences in Pedagogic Settings.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of York.Google Scholar
Markee, Numa
2000 “Conversation Analysis” In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, ed. by Eli Hinkel. Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2004 “Zones of Interactional Transition in ESL Classes.” The Modern Language Journal 88 (iv): 583–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Toward a Learning Behavior Tracking Methodology for CA-for-SLA.” Applied Linguistics 29 (3): 404–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markee, Numa, and Gabriele Kasper
2004 “Classroom Talks: An Introduction.” The Modern Language Journal 88 (4): 491–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McHoul, Alexander
1978 “The Organization of Turns at Formal Talk in the Classroom.” Language in Society 7 (2): 183–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh
1979 Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2006 “Participants’ Online Analysis and Multimodal Practices: Projecting the End of the Turn and the Closing of the Sequence.” Discourse Studies 8 (1): 117–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Multimodal Resources for Turn-Taking: Pointing and the Emergence of Possible Next Speakers.” Discourse Studies 9 (2): 1994–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “The Embodied and Negotiated Production of Assessments in Instructed Actions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (4): 329–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Multimodal Completions.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 267–308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2018 “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza, and Simona Pekarek Doehler
2004 “Second Language Acquisition as Situated Practice: Task Accomplishment in the French Second Language Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 88 (iv): 501–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mori, Junko, and Atsushi Hasegawa
2009 “Doing Being a Foreign Language Learner in a Classroom: Embodiment of Cognitive States as Social Events.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 47 (1): 65–94.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Kristian
2009 “Establishing Recipiency in Pre-beginning Position in the Second Language Classroom.” Discourse Processes 46 (5): 491–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, Kristian, and Spencer Hazel
2011 “Initiating Round Robins in the L2 Classroom- Preliminary Observations.” Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5 (1): 55–70.Google Scholar
Musumeci, Diane
1996 “Teacher-Learner Negotiation in Content-based Instruction: Communication at Cross-purposes?” Applied Linguistics 17 (3): 286–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mika Rauniomaa
eds. 2014 Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity. Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Hanh Thi
2017 “Toward a Conversation Analytic Framework for Tracking Interactional Competence Development from School to Work.” In Interactional Competences in Institutional Settings, 197–225. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Mary Catherine, and Sarah Michaels
1993 “Aligning Academic Task and Participation Status through Revoicing: Analysis of a Classroom Discourse Strategy.” Anthropology and Education Quarterly 24 (4): 318–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olsher, David
2004 “Talk and Gesture: The Embodied Completion of Sequential Actions in Spoken Interaction.” In Second Language Conversations, ed. by Rod Gardner, and Johannes Wagner, 221–245. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Okada, Misao
2018 “Imperative Actions in Boxing Sparring Sessions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 67–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Yujong
2013 “The Roles of Third Turn Repeats in Two L2 Classroom Interactional Contexts.” Applied Linguistics: 1–24.Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Evelyne Pochon-Berger
2015 “The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: Evidence from Turn-taking Organization, Sequence Organization, Repair Organization and Preference Organization.” In Usage-based perspectives on second language learning, ed. by Teresa Cadierno, and Søren Wind Eskildsen, 233–268. De Gruyter Mouton Germany.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Pursuing a Response.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 152–164. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel Schegloff
2002 “Home Position.” Gesture 2 (2): 133–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sahlström, J. F.
2002 “The Interactional Organization of Hand Raising in Classroom Interaction.” Journal of Classroom Interaction 37 (2): 47–57.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American anthropologist 70 (6):1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 “On Some Gestures’ Relation to Talk.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 266–296. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1998 “Body Torque.” Social Research 65 (3): 435–596.Google Scholar
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, Paul
2004 The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
Sert, Olçay
2011 “A Micro-analytic Investigation of Claims of Insufficient Knowledge in EAL Classrooms.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
2015 Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McHardy, and Malcolm Coulthard
1975 Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skogmyr Marian, Klara, and Ufuk Balaman
2018 “Second Language Interactional Competence and its Development: An Overview of Conversation Analytic Research on Interactional Change over Time.” Language and Linguistics Compass: e12285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2010 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curt LeBaron
2011 “Embodied interaction in the material world: An introduction.” In Embodied Interaction, ed. by Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron, 1–28. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Young, Richard F., and Elizabeth R. Miller
2004 “Learning as Changing Participation: Discourse Roles in ESL Writing Conferences.” The Modern Language Journal 88 (4): 519–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Sumin, and Theo van Leeuwen
2014 “Understanding Semiotic Technology in University Classrooms: A Social Semiotic Approach to PowerPoint-assisted Cultural Studies Lectures.” Classroom Discourse 5(1): 71–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ro, Eunseok
2023. Using PowerPoint slides as a resource for coordinating understanding during presentation consultations at an L2 speaking center. Applied Linguistics Review 14:3 ► pp. 579 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.