Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Empirical Studies of Literariness
Edited by Massimo Salgaro and Paul Sopčák
[Scientific Study of Literature 8:1] 2018
► pp. 6–18
Introduction

Historical introduction to the special issue on literariness

| Università di Verona
Article outline
  • 1.Literariness and foregrounding (1920–1960)
  • 2.Literariness in academic discussions on post-structuralism and reader response theories (1960–1980)
  • 3.Literariness and empirical research (since 1980)
  • 4.Literariness and literary theory after the end of literary theory (since 2000)
  • References
Published online: 17 January 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.00005.sal
References (32)
References
Attridge, D., & Elliot, J. (Eds.). (2011). Theory after theory. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
Birns, N. (2010). Theory after theory: An intellectual history of literary theory from 1950 to the early 21st century. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1995). The rules of art, genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The literary in theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Di Girolamo, C. (1978). Critica della letterarietà. Il Saggiatore, Milano.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. (2004). After theory. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1979). Lector in fabula. Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Eichenbaum, B. M. (1926/1971). The theory of the “formal method.” Ladislav.Google Scholar
Felski, R. (2008). Uses of literature. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fish, S. (1973–1974). How ordinary is ordinary language. New Literary History, 491.Google Scholar
Grizelj, M., & Jahraus, O. (Eds.). (2011). Theorietheorie, Wider die Theoriemüdigkeit in den Geisteswissenschaften, Fink.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1976). The act of reading. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens [Neurocognitive poetics: Elements of a model of literary reading]. In R. Schrott, & A. M. Jacobs. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (pp. 492–450). München, Germany: Hanser.Google Scholar
(2013). Neurocognitive model of literary reading. Retrieved from [URL]
(2015). Towards a neurocognitive model of literary reading. In R. Willems (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of natural language (pp. 135–160). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1987). Language in literature. K. Pomorska & S. Rudy (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jauss, H. R. (1967). Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Miall, D. (2006). Literary reading empirical and theoretical studies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Miall, D., & Kuiken, D. (1998). The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 251, 327–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 281, 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. London, United Kingdom: Verso.Google Scholar
Mukarovský, J. (1932/1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague school reader on aesthetics, literary structure, and style (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, M., & Schad, J. (Eds). (2004). life.after.theory: Jacques Derrida, Toril Moi, Frank Kermode and Christopher Norris. London, United Kingdom: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pomorska, K. (1975). Introduction. In K. Pomorska & S. Rudy (Eds.). Language in literature (pp. 1–17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V. (1917/1965). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis, Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics. An introduction. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. (1979). Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics, 81, 569–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winko, S. (2009). Auf der Suche nach der Weltformel. Literarizität und Poetizität in der neueren literaturtheoretischen Diskussion, in: Grenzen der Literatur . Zu Begriff und Phänomen des Literarischen. Berlin: de Gruyter S. 374–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winko, S., Jannidis, F., & Lauer, G. (2009). Radikal historisiert. Für einen pragmatischen Literaturbegriff, in: Grenzen der Literatur. Zu Begriff und Phänomen des Literarischen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 3–41.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. (1991). Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation. Poetics, 201, 139–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994). Effects of genre expectations on text comprehension. Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Salgaro, Massimo
2022. Literary value in the era of big data. Operationalizing critical distance in professional and non-professional reviews. Journal of Cultural Analytics 7:2 DOI logo
Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4 ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.