Introduction
Historical introduction to the special issue on literariness
Article outline
- 1.Literariness and foregrounding (1920–1960)
- 2.Literariness in academic discussions on post-structuralism and reader response theories (1960–1980)
- 3.Literariness and empirical research (since 1980)
- 4.Literariness and literary theory after the end of literary theory (since 2000)
-
References
References (32)
References
Attridge, D., & Elliot, J.
(Eds.) (
2011)
Theory after theory. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birns, N.
(
2010)
Theory after theory: An intellectual history of literary theory from 1950 to the early 21st century. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bourdieu, P.
(
1995)
The rules of art, genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culler, J.
(
1975)
Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culler, J.
(
2006)
The literary in theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Di Girolamo, C.
(
1978)
Critica della letterarietà. Il Saggiatore, Milano.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eagleton, T.
(
2004)
After theory. New York, NY: Penguin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eco, U.
(
1979)
Lector in fabula. Milano: Bompiani.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eichenbaum, B. M.
(
1926/1971)
The theory of the “formal method.” Ladislav.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Felski, R.
(
2008)
Uses of literature. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fish, S.
(
1973–1974)
How ordinary is ordinary language.
New Literary History, 491.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grizelj, M., & Jahraus, O.
(Eds.) (
2011)
Theorietheorie, Wider die Theoriemüdigkeit in den Geisteswissenschaften, Fink.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iser, W.
(
1976)
The act of reading. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, A. M.
(
2011)
Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens [Neurocognitive poetics: Elements of a model of literary reading]. In
R. Schrott, &
A. M. Jacobs (2011)
Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (pp. 492–450). München, Germany: Hanser.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, A. M.
(
2013)
Neurocognitive model of literary reading. Retrieved from
[URL]
Jacobs, A. M.
(
2015)
Towards a neurocognitive model of literary reading. In
R. Willems (Ed.),
Cognitive neuroscience of natural language (pp. 135–160). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, R.
(
1987)
Language in literature.
K. Pomorska &
S. Rudy (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jauss, H. R.
(
1967)
Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miall, D.
(
2006)
Literary reading empirical and theoretical studies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miall, D., & Kuiken, D.
(
1998)
The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness.
Poetics, 251, 327–341.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miall, D., & Kuiken, D.
(
1999)
What is literariness? Three components of literary reading.
Discourse Processes, 281, 121–138.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moretti, F.
(
2013)
Distant reading. London, United Kingdom: Verso.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mukarovský, J.
(
1932/1964)
Standard language and poetic language. In
P. L. Garvin (Ed.),
A Prague school reader on aesthetics, literary structure, and style (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Payne, M., & Schad, J.
(Eds) (
2004)
life.after.theory: Jacques Derrida, Toril Moi, Frank Kermode and Christopher Norris. London, United Kingdom: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pomorska, K.
(
1975)
Introduction. In
K. Pomorska &
S. Rudy (Eds.).
Language in literature (pp. 1–17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shklovsky, V.
(
1917/1965)
Art as technique. In
L. T. Lemon &
M. J. Reis,
Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stockwell, P.
(
2002)
Cognitive poetics. An introduction. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, T.
(
1979)
Advice on theoretical poetics.
Poetics, 81, 569–608.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winko, S.
(
2009)
Auf der Suche nach der Weltformel. Literarizität und Poetizität in der neueren literaturtheoretischen Diskussion, in: Grenzen der Literatur
.
Zu Begriff und Phänomen des Literarischen. Berlin: de Gruyter S. 374–399.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winko, S., Jannidis, F., & Lauer, G.
(
2009)
Radikal historisiert. Für einen pragmatischen Literaturbegriff, in:
Grenzen der Literatur. Zu Begriff und Phänomen des Literarischen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 3–41.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwaan, R.
(
1991)
Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation.
Poetics, 201, 139–156.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwaan, R.
(
1994)
Effects of genre expectations on text comprehension.
Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Salgaro, Massimo
2022.
Literary value in the era of big data. Operationalizing critical distance in professional and non-professional reviews.
Journal of Cultural Analytics 7:2
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019.
The year’s work in stylistics 2018.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4
► pp. 354 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.