Cover not available
Article published In:
Empirical Studies of Literariness
Edited by Massimo Salgaro and Paul Sopčák
[Scientific Study of Literature 8:1] 2018
► pp. 21–46

Towards an empirical model of literariness

| University of Alberta
Article outline
  • 1.Noticing: An empirical study
  • 2.Music
  • 3.The years of trauma
  • 4.Patterns of inheritance
  • 5.The trials of disinterest
  • 6.The threads of a vocation
  • 7.The demands of the discipline
  • 8.A redesign of literary history
  • 9.Way markers in research design
  • 10.The gift of collaboration
  • 11.The domain of the interdisciplinary
  • 12.Literariness and the rules of art
  • 13.Rereading, feeling and imagination
  • References
Published online: 17 January 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.00007.mia
References (30)
References
Aristotle (1965). Poetics , in Classical literary criticism, trans. T. S. Dorsch. London, United Kindgom: Penguin.Google Scholar
Blake, W. (1971). Marriage of heaven and hell. W. H. Stevenson & D. V. Erdman (Eds.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Bruhn, M. J., & Miall, D. S. (2018). Citation analysis as a measure of the textual basis of literariness. 16th Biennial Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature. Stavanger, Norway, July 25–28.
Burke, E. (1990). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. A. Phillips (Ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Grosset/Putman.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 791, 701–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Independent (1993). The Independent (May 2, 1993). Obituary for D. W. Harding.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1790/1987). Critique of Judgment. W. S. Pluhar (Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Keen, S. (2006). A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 141, 207–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, G. (1955). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Peyk, P., and Junghofer, M. (2007). Buzzwords: Early cortical responses to emotional words during reading. Psychological Science, 181, 475–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S. (2004). Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 251, 171–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, R. (1993). The new interdisciplinarity in literary criticism. In N. Easterlin & B. Riebling (Eds.), After Poststructuralism (pp. 13–43). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Macherey, P. (1978). A theory of literary production. London, United Kingdom: Routledge and Kegan-Paul.Google Scholar
Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics, 201, 193–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Massey, I. (2009). The neural imagination: Aesthetic and neuroaesthetic approaches to the arts. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S. (1976). Aesthetic unity and the role of the brain. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 351, 57–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 221, 389–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1979). Images and models, similes and metaphors. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–250). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nauta, W. J. H. (1971). The problem of the frontal lobe: A reinterpretation. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 81, 167–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A. (1979). Metaphor & thought. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, J. (2001). The intellectual life of the British working classes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Eds.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. Wolfeboro, NH: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, W. (1965). “The Child is Father of the Man.” In J. Stillinger (Ed.), Selected Poems and Prefaces (pp. 186–191). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
(1974). The prose works. W. J. B. Owen & J. W. Smyser (Eds.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 1231, 162–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Porto, M. Dolores
2024. From conceptual to literary metaphors. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Ortner, Jessica, Tea Sindbæk Andersen & Fedja Wierød Borčak
2022. ‘Fiction keeps memory about the war alive’: Mnemonic migration and literary representations of the war in Bosnia. Memory Studies 15:4 ► pp. 918 ff. DOI logo
Paliichuk, Elina
2022. Cognitive “warning signs” in human trafficking media texts. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :38(3) ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Karam, Khaled Mostafa & Helmy Elfiel
2021. An Experimental Appraisal of the Acquisition of Creative Literary Compression versus Descriptive Texts. Creativity Research Journal 33:2 ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4 ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.