Article published in:Empirical Studies of Literariness
Edited by Massimo Salgaro and Paul Sopčák
[Scientific Study of Literature 8:1] 2018
► pp. 21–46
Towards an empirical model of literariness
- 1.Noticing: An empirical study
- 3.The years of trauma
- 4.Patterns of inheritance
- 5.The trials of disinterest
- 6.The threads of a vocation
- 7.The demands of the discipline
- 8.A redesign of literary history
- 9.Way markers in research design
- 10.The gift of collaboration
- 11.The domain of the interdisciplinary
- 12.Literariness and the rules of art
- 13.Rereading, feeling and imagination
Published online: 17 January 2019
Bruhn, M. J., & Miall, D. S.
(2018) Citation analysis as a measure of the textual basis of literariness. 16th Biennial Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature. Stavanger, Norway, July 25–28.
Damasio, A. R.
Gerrig, R. J.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Peyk, P., and Junghofer, M.
Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S.
Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C.
Miall, D. S.
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
Miller, G. A.
Nauta, W. J. H.
van Peer, W.
Cited by 2 other publications
Karam, Khaled Mostafa & Helmy Elfiel
Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.