On the crucial role of “Arousal” and “Saliency” in affective iconicity
Comment on “Methodological Issues in the Study of Phonetic Symbolism” by Tsur and Gafni
Tsur and Gafni (T&G) claim that individual sounds can suggest “elementary percepts,” which, depending on the context, can evoke “specific emotions.” However, their proposal suffers from a lack of a theoretical framework and embedding of the theory in the broader scholarly literature. In terms of existing emotion theories and in line with the results of our previous neurocognitive studies on the topic, the proposed differentiation between these two levels of processing can be best represented by two affective dimensions of arousal and valence, respectively. In addition, our statistical measure for assessing the basic affective tone of texts suggests that the use of mere or rational frequencies of occurrence of all phonemes in a poem – instead of a focus on foregrounded and salient phonemes – may be a further reason for discrepancies of results of previous studies.
Article outline
- Introduction
- On the role of arousal in affective iconicity
- On the role of foregrounding and salience in affective iconicity
- Conclusion and outlook
-
References
References (50)
References
Albers, S. (2008). Lautsymbolik in ägyptischen Texten. Mainz: Philipp Von Zabern Verlag Gmbh.
Aryani, A. (2018). Affective iconicity in language and poerty: A neurocognitive approach. Freien Universität Berlin, doctoral dissertation.
Aryani, A., Conrad, M., Schmidtke, D., & Jacobs, A. (2018a). Why’piss’ is ruder than’pee’? The role of sound in affective meaning making. PloS One, 13(6), e0198430.
Aryani, A., Hsu, C.-T., & Jacobs, A. M. (2018b). The Sound of Words Evokes Affective Brain Responses. Brain Sciences, 8(6).
Aryani, A., Hsu, C. T., & Jacobs, A. M. (2019). Affective iconic words benefit from additional sound-meaning integration in the left amygdala. Human brain mapping, 40(18), 5289–5300.
Aryani, A., & Jacobs, A. M. (2018c). Affective Congruence between Sound and Meaning of Words Facilitates Semantic Decision. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 8(6).
Aryani, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2013). Extracting salient sublexical units from written texts: “Emophon,” a corpus-based approach to phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology, 41(OCT), 1–15.
Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Ullrich, S., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2016). Measuring the Basic Affective Tone of Poems via Phonological Saliency and Iconicity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol 10(2), 191–204.
Aryani, A., Isbilen, E., Christiansen, M. (in press) Affective Arousal Links Sound to Meaning, Psychological Science,
Bachorowski, J.-A. (1999). Vocal expression and perception of emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(2), 53–57.
Banse, R., & Scherer, K. R. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 614.
Bänziger, T., Hosoya, G., & Scherer, K. R. (2015). Path models of vocal emotion communication. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 1–29.
Bänziger, T., & Scherer, K. R. (2005). The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Communication, 46(3–4), 252–267.
Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are Emotions Natural Kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(1), 28–58.
Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Old proverbs in new skins-an fMRI study on defamiliarization. Frontiers in Psychology, 31(JUL), 1–18.
Briesemeister, B. B., Kuchinke, L., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Emotion word recognition: Discrete information effects first, continuous later? Brain Research, 15641, 62–71.
Briesemeister, B. B., Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2015). Emotions in reading: Dissociation of happiness and positivity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 287–298.
Citron, F. M. M. (2012). Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: a review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 122(3), 211–226.
Ethofer, T., Van De Ville, D., Scherer, K., & Vuilleumier, P. (2009). Decoding of emotional information in voice-sensitive cortices. Current Biology, 19(12), 1028–1033.
Fónagy, I. ((1961). Communication in poetry. Word, 171, 194–218.
Hakemulder, J. F. (2004). Foregrounding and its effect on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 381, 193–218.
Hsu, C. T., Jacobs, A. M., Altmann, U., & Conrad, M. (2015). The magical activation of left amygdala when reading Harry Potter: An fMRI study on how descriptions of supra-natural events entertain and enchant. PLoS ONE.
Jacobs, A. M. (2015a). Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 91(April), 1–22.
Jacobs, A. M. (2015b). Towards a eurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use.
Jacobs, A. M. (2017). Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 111(December), 1–7.
Jacobs, A. M., Hofmann, M. J., & Kinder, A. (2016). On elementary affective decisions: To like or not to like, that is the question. Frontiers in Psychology, 71(NOV), 1–17.
Jacobs, A. M., & Kinder, A. (2018). What makes a metaphor literary? Answers from two computational studies. Metaphor and Symbol.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 350–377.
Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2003). Communication of Emotions in Vocal Expression and Music Performance: Different Channels, Same Code? Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 770–814.
Kuhlmann, M., Hofmann, M. J., Briesemeister, B. B., & Jacobs, A. M. (2016). Mixing positive and negative valence: Affective-semantic integration of bivalent words. Scientific Reports, 61, 1–7.
Lüdtke, J., Meyer-Sickendieck, B., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Immersing in the stillness of an early morning: Testing the mood empathy hypothesis of poetry reception. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 363–377.
Menninghaus, W., Bohrn, I. C., Knoop, C. A., Kotz, S. A., Schlotz, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Rhetorical features facilitate prosodic processing while handicapping ease of semantic comprehension. Cognition.
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect response to literary stories. Poetics 221, 389–407.
Mukarovsky, J. (1964). “Standard language and poetic language”. In A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structures and Style, ed P. Garvin (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press), 17–30.
Osgood, C. E. (1952). The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49(3), 197.
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Affective Science.
Recio, G., Conrad, M., Hansen, L. B., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). On pleasure and thrill: The interplay between arousal and valence during visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 1341, 34–43.
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.
Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Calder, A. J., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Perceptual cues in nonverbal vocal expressions of emotion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2251–2272.
Scherer, K. R. (2003). Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication, 40(1–2), 227–256.
Scherer, K. R., Clark-Polner, E., & Mortillaro, M. (2011). In the eye of the beholder? Universality and cultural specificity in the expression and perception of emotion. International Journal of Psychology, 46(6), 401–435.
Schmidtke, D. S., & Aryani, A. (2015). Bridges from affect to language Comment on “The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model” by S. Koelsch et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 131, 83–84.
Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. Hanser.
Shklovsky, V. (1990). Theory of Prose. Trans. Benjamin Sher. Elmwood Park: Dalkey Archive, 1990.
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An Introduction. Cognitive Stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis.
Tsur, R. (1992). What makes sound patterns expressive?: the poetic mode of speech perception. Duke University Press.
Ullrich, S., Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2017). On the relation between the general affective meaning and the basic sublexical, lexical, and inter-lexical features of poetic texts-a case study using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(JAN), 1–19.
Ullrich, S., Kotz, S. A., Schmidtke, D. S., Aryani, A., & Conrad, M. (2016). Phonological iconicity electrifies: An ERP study on affective sound-to-meaning correspondences in German. Frontiers in psychology, 71, 1200.
Whissell, C. (1999). Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of differing emotional tone. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89(1), 19–48.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.