Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp. 3–34

Sound-meaning relations in Japanese Tanka

Formant dispersion of vowels is associated with dominance and activity

| National University of Singapore
This study aimed to test sound-meaning relations in Japanese poetry. To this end, participants assessed the sentiments expressed in a random selection of Tanka (a specific form of Japanese poetry) on six bipolar scales comprising Evaluation (emotional valence), Potency (dominance), and Activity (arousal). The selected Tanka differed with regard to their average formant-dispersion (i.e., the distance between the first and second formant). Corroborating results of a previous study that tested the relation between formant dispersion and emotional tone in German poetry, results suggest that poems with an extremely low average formant dispersion have a significantly higher likelihood of expressing dominance and activity than poems with an extremely high formant dispersion. No significant differences regarding the Evaluation dimension were found.
Keywords: sound iconicity, sound symbolism, formant dispersion, emotion, dominance, activity, arousal
Article outline
  • Sound-Meaning relations in Japanese Tanka: Formant dispersion of vowels is associated with dominance and activity
    • Objectives and hypothesis
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Materials
      • Tanka
    • Procedure
    • Data analysis
  • Results
    • Analysis of variance: Effect of Tankas’ category on readers’ assessment
    • Tukey test for multiple comparisons between categories
    • Comparison between ratings per item
    • Linear-Mixed-Model regression: Individual differences between participants
  • Discussion
  • Supplementary materials
    • Authors of selected Tankas
    • Japanese
    • Invitation
    • Instructions
  • References
Published online: 17 December 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.21006.aur
References
Adams, F. M., & Osgood, C. E.
(1973) A cross-cultural study of the affective meanings of color. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4 (2), 135–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, J. S., Estes, Z., & Cossu, M.
(2018) Emotional sound symbolism: Languages rapidly signal valence via phonemes. Cognition, 175 1, 122–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Albers, S.
(2008) Lautsymbolik in ägyptischen Texten [Sound symbolism in Egyptian texts]. Mainz, Germany: WBG Zabern.Google Scholar
Arnheim, R.
(1986) New essays on the psychology of art. Berkley, CA: University of California Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aryani, A.
(2019) On the crucial role of “Arousal” and “Saliency” in affective iconicity. Comment on “Methodological Issues in the Study of Phonetic Symbolism” by Tsur and Gafni. Scientific studies of literature, 9 (2), 240–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aryani, A., Conrad, M., Schmidtke, D., & Jacobs, A.
(2018) Why ‘piss’ is ruder than ‘pee’? The role of sound in affective meaning making. PloS One, 13 (6): e0198430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aryani, A., Isbilen, E. S., & Christiansen, M. H.
(2020) Affective arousal links sound to meaning. Psychological science, 31 (8), 978–986. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aryani, A., & Jacobs, A. M.
(2018) Affective congruence between sound and meaning of words facilitates semantic decision. Behavioral sciences, 8 (6): 56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Ullrich, S., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M.
(2016) Measuring the basic affective tone of poems via phonological saliency and iconicity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10 (2), 191–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auracher, J.
(2017) Sound iconicity of abstract concepts: Place of articulation is implicitly associated with abstract concepts of size and social dominance. PloS One, 12 (11): e0187196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auracher, J., Albers, S., Zhai, Y., Gareeva, G., & Stavniychuk, T.
(2011) P is for happiness, N is for sadness: Universals in sound iconicity to detect emotions in poetry. Discourse Processes, 48 (1), 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auracher, J., Menninghaus, W., & Scharinger, M.
(2020) Sound predicts meaning: Cross-modal associations between formant frequency and emotional tone in stanzas. Cognitive Science, 44 (10): e12906. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auracher, J., Scharinger, M., & Menninghaus, W.
(2019) Contiguity-based sound iconicity: The meaning of words resonates with phonetic properties of their immediate verbal contexts. PloS One, 14 (5): e0216930. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, I., van der Voordt, T., Vink, P., & de Boon, J.
(2014) Pleasure, arousal, dominance: Mehrabian and Russell revisited. Current Psychology, 33 (3), 405–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Becker, J. A., & Fisher, S. K.
(1988) Comparison of associations to vowel speech sounds by English and Spanish speakers. The American Journal of Psychology, 101 (1), 51–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, M., & Varon, E. J.
(1933) An accessory study of “Phonetic Symbolism.” The American Journal of Psychology, 45 (1), 76–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birch, D., & Erickson, M.
(1957) Phonetic symbolism with respect to three dimensions from the semantic differential. The Journal of General Psychology, 58 (2), 291–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F., & Christiansen, M. H.
(2016) Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113 (39), 10818–10823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, A. J., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., Fockert, J. D., Linnell, K. J., & Spence, C.
(2013) “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture makes similar shape–sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners. Cognition, 126 (2), 165–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, B. D., Ellis, W. A. H., Brumm, J., Nilsson, K., & Fitch, W. T.
(2012) Female koalas prefer bellows in which lower formants indicate larger males. Animal Behaviour, 84 1, 1565–1571. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, B. D., Ellis, W. A. H., McKinnon, A. J., Cowin, G. J., Brumm, J., Nilsson, K., & Fitch, W. T.
(2011) Cues to body size in the formant spacing of male koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) bellows: honesty in an exaggerated trait. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 214 (20), 3414–3422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, B. D., & Reby, D.
(2016) The evolution of acoustic size exaggeration in terrestrial mammals. Nature Communications, 7 1: 12739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cluysenaar, A. A. A.
(1976) Introduction to literary stylistics. London, B.T.: Batsford.Google Scholar
Coulter, K. S.
(2009) The effects of phonetic symbolism on comparative price perceptions. In A. L. McGill & S. Shavitt (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 361, pp. 986–987). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A.
(2010) Small sounds, big deals: Phonetic symbolism effects in pricing. Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 315–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, L. E.
(2009) Conceptual metaphors of affect. Emotion Review, 1 (2), 129–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuskley, C., Dingemanse, M., Kirby, S., & van Leeuwen, T. M.
(2019) Cross-modal associations and synesthesia: Categorical perception and structure in vowel–color mappings in a large online sample. Behavior Research Methods, 51 (4), 1651–1675. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuskley, C., Simner, J., & Kirby, S.
(2017) Phonological and orthographic influences in the bouba–kiki effect. Psychological Research, 81(1), 119–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, F.
(1959) Course in general linguistics. New York, NY: Philosophical Library. Online available at https://​ia802704​.us​.archive​.org​/35​/items​/courseingenerall00saus​/courseingenerall00saus​.pdf
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., Monaghan, P.
(2015) Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19 (10), 603–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Perlman, M., & Perniss, P.
(2020) Construals of iconicity: Experimental approaches to form–meaning resemblances in language. Language and Cognition, 12 (1), 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dinnissen, K., & Louwerse, M. M.
(2015) The sound of valence: Phonological features predict word meaning. In: Noelle, D. C., Dale, R., Warlaumont, A. S., Yoshimi, J., Matlock, T., Jennings, C. D., & Maglio, P. P. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from https://​cogsci​.mindmodeling​.org​/2015​/papers​/0107​/paper0107​.pdf
Duduciuc, A. C.
(2015) Advertising brands by means of sound symbolism: The influence of vowels on perceived brand characteristics. Studies and Scientific Researches: Economics, 21 1, 112–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eldridge, R.
(1985) Form and content: An aesthetic theory of art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 25 (4), 303–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erben Johansson, N., Anikin, A., Carling, G., & Holmer, A.
(2020) The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology, 24 (2), 253–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S., Neave, N., & Wakelin, D.
(2006) Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: An evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice. Biological Psychology, 72 (2), 160–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E.
(1968) Perceptual dimensions of vowels. Language Typology and Universals, 21 (1–6), 94–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1978) On the universal character of phonetic symbolism with special reference to vowels. Studia Linguistica, 32 (1–2): 80–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. T.
(1997) Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102 (2), 1213–1222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. T., & Giedd, J.
(1999) Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106 (3), 1511–1522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folkins, C., & Lenrow, P. B.
(1966) An investigation of the expressive values of graphemes. Psychological Record, 16 1, 193–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fónagy, I.
(1961) Communication in poetry. Word, 17 (2), 194–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallace, A., & Spence, C.
(2006) Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size. Perception & Psychophysics, 68 1, 1191–1203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, M.
(2004) The origins of arbitrariness in language. In K. D. Forbus, D. S. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 434–439). http://​www​.cs​.indiana​.edu​/l​/www​/pub​/gasser​/cogsci04​.pdf
Greenberg, J. H., & Jenkins, J. J.
(1966) Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word, 22 (1–3), 207–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, H., Bowern, C., & LaPalombara, H.
(2014) Sound Symbolism in the languages of Australia. PLoS ONE, 9 (4): e92852. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hevner, K.
(1937) An experimental study of the affective value of sounds in poetry. The American Journal of Psychology, 49 (3), 419–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J.
(1994) Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound Symbolism (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F.
(1959) Animal “languages” and human language. Human Biology, 31 (1), 32–39. https://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/41449227
Hornbostel, E. M. v.
(1927/1938) The unity of the senses. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (p. 210–216). Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company. (Original work published 1927). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoshi, H., Kwon, N., Akita, K., & Auracher, J.
(2019) Semantic associations dominate over perceptual associations in vowel–size iconicity. I-Perception, 10 (4), 2041669519861981. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imai, M., & Kita, S.
(2014) The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 369 (1651), 20130298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H.
(2008) Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109 (1), 54–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R.
(1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.) Style in Language, (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., & Waugh, L. R.
(1979) The sound shape of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1922) Language: It’s nature, development and origin. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M., & Kita, S.
(2011) Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word learning in English-speaking children. Cognitive Science, 35 (3), 575–586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klink, R. R.
(2000) Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters, 11 (1), 5–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klink, R. R., & Wu, L.
(2014) The role of position, type, and combination of sound symbolism imbeds in brand names. Marketing Letters, 25 (1), 13–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knöferle, K., Li, J., Maggioni, E., & Spence, C.
(2017) What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings. Scientific Reports, 7 (1), 5562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knöferle, K., & Spence, C.
(2012) Crossmodal correspondences between sounds and tastes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19 1, 992–1006. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, W.
(1929) Gestalt psychology, an introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: LiverightGoogle Scholar
Körtvélyessy, L.
(2011) A cross-linguistic research into phonetic iconicity. Lexis, 6 1. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westermann, G.
(2010) The shape of words in the brain. Cognition, 114 (1): 19–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kraxenberger, M., & Menninghaus, W.
(2016) Mimological reveries? Disconfirming the hypothesis of phono-emotional iconicity in poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 1:1779. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J.
(1690) An essay concerning human understanding. Book III: Words. Available at: https://​www​.earlymoderntexts​.com​/assets​/pdfs​/locke1690book3​.pdf. Crossref
Lockwood, G., & Dingemanse, M.
(2015) Iconicity in the lab: a review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6 1:1246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, G., Dingemanse, M., & Hagoort, P.
(2016) Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42 (8), 1274–1281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, G., Hagoort, P., & Dingemanse, M.
(2016) Synthesized size-sound symbolism. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2016) (pp. 1823–1828). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M., & Qu, Z.
(2017) Estimating valence from the sound of a word: Computational, experimental, and cross-linguistic evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24 1, 849–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lowrey, T. M., & Shrum, L. J.
(2007) Phonetic symbolism and brand name preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (3), 406–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lupyan, G., & Winter, B.
(2018) Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren’t languages more iconic? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 373 1: 20170137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markel, N. N., & Hamp, E. P.
(1960) Connotative meanings of certain phoneme sequences. Studies in Linguistics, 14 (3–4), 47–61.Google Scholar
Marks, L. E.
(1974) On associations of light and sound: the mediation of brightness, pitch, and loudness. American Journal of Psychology, 87 (1–2), 173–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1978) The unity of senses: Interrelations among the modalities. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) On cross-modal similarity: the perceptual structure of pitch, loudness, and brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15 (3), 586–602. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, D., Pathman, T., & Mondloch, C. J.
(2006) The shape of boubas: sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9 (3):316–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A.
(1974) An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., Crawford, L. E., & Ahlvers, W. J.
(2007) When “light” and “dark” thoughts become light and dark responses: Affect biases brightness judgments. Emotion, 7 (2), 366–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S.
(2001) Sounds of contrast: An empirical approach to phonetic iconicity. Poetics, 29 (1), 55–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miron, M. S.
(1961) A crosslinguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62 (3), 623–630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, P., & Fletcher, M.
(2019) Do sound symbolism effects for written words relate to individual phonemes or to phoneme features? Language and Cognition, 11 (2), 235–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S.
(2014) How arbitrary is language? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 369 (1651): 20130299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moos, A., Smith, R., Miller, S. R., & Simmons, D. R.
(2014) Cross-modal associations in synaesthesia: Vowel colours in the ear of the beholder. i-Perception, 5 (2), 132–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C.
(1939) Esthetics and the theory of signs. The Journal of Unified Science, 8 (1/3), 131–150. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from http://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/20010422. Crossref
Morris, C., & Hamilton, D.
(1965) Aesthetics, signs, and icons. Philosophy and phenomenological research, 25 (3), 356–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, M.
(1869) Lectures on The Science of Language, vol. 21. New York: Charles Scribner and Company.Google Scholar
Nastase, V., Sokolova, M., & Shirabad, J. S.
(2007) Do happy words sound happy? A study of the relation between form and meaning for English words expressing emotions. In G. Angelova, K. Bontcheva, R. Mitkov, N. Nicolov, & N. Nicolov (Eds.), Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2007). Conference in Borovets, Bulgaria (pp. 406–410). Retrieved January 7, 2021, from http://​lml​.bas​.bg​/ranlp2007​/DOCS​/RANLP2007​.pdf
Newman, S. S.
(1933) Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. The American Journal of Psychology, 45 (1), 53–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, A. K. S., & Rendall, D.
(2011) The sound of round: Evaluating the sound-symbolic role of consonants in the classic Takete-Maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65 (2), 115–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Parsing the role of consonants versus vowels in the classic Takete-Maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67 (2), 153–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B.
(1999) The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28 (1), 225–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, L. C., Cook, A. E., & Namy, L. L.
(2009) Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition, 112 (1), 181–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, J.
(1997) Sound Symbolism. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.) Proceedings of the 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics [SICOL] (pp. 98–103). Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea.Google Scholar
Ohtake, Y., & Haryu, E.
(2013) Investigation of the process underpinning vowel–size correspondence. Japanese Psychological Research, 55(4), 390–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H.
(1957) The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ozturk, O., Krehm, M., & Vouloumanos, A.
(2013) Sound symbolism in infancy: evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114 (2), 173–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parise, C. V., & Spence, C.
(2012) Audiovisual cross-modal correspondences and sound symbolism: A study using the implicit association test. Experimental Brain Research, 220 1, 319–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Audiovisual cross-modal correspondences in the general population. In Simner, J. & Hubbard, E. M. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia (pp. 790–815). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, J. W., & Osera, S.
(2008) The effect of brand sound on consumers’ brand evaluation in Japan. In C. R. Acevedo, J. M. C. Hernandez, & T. M. Lowrey (Eds.), Latin American Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 21, pp. 188–189). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Peña, M., Mehler, J., & Nespor, M.
(2011) The role of audiovisual processing in early conceptual development. Psychological Science, 22 (11), 1419–1421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G.
(2010) Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1 1: 227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perry, L. K., Perlman, M., & Lupyan, G.
(2015) Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PloS One, 10 (9): e0137147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perry, L. K., Perlman, M., Winter, B., Massaro, D. W., & Lupyan, G.
(2018) Iconicity in the speech of children and adults. Developmental Science, 21 (3): e12572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pisanski, K., Mora, E., Pisanski, A., Reby, D., Sorokowski, P., Frackowiak, T., & Feinberg, D. R.
(2016) Volitional exaggeration of body size through fundamental and formant frequency modulation in humans. Scientific Reports, 6 1: 34389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pogacar, R., Plant, E., Rosulek, L. F., & Kouril, M.
(2015) Sounds good: Phonetic sound patterns in top brand names. Marketing Letters, 26 (4), 549–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pope, A.
(1711) An essay on criticism. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from https://​www​.gutenberg​.org​/files​/7409​/7409​-h​/7409​-h​.htm
Preziosi, M. A., & Coane, J. H.
(2017) Remembering that big things sound big: Sound symbolism and associative memory. Cognitive Research, 2 1:10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Puts, D. A., Hodges, C. R., Cárdenas, R. A., & Gaulin, S. J. C.
(2007) Men’s voices as dominance signals: Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28 (5), 340–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved January 12, 2021, from https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M.
(2001) Synaesthesia--a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Reay, I. E.
(1994) Sound symbolism. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (1st ed., pp. 4064–4070). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Reber, S. A., Janisch, J., Torregrosa, K. et al.
(2017) Formants provide honest acoustic cues to body size in American alligators. Scientific Reports, 7 1: 1816. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roblee, L., & Washburn, M.
(1912) The affective values of articulate sounds. The American Journal of Psychology, 23 (4), 579–583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Schlegelmilch, R., & Grice, M.
(2014) Mood is linked to vowel type: The role of articulatory movements. Emotion, 14 (2), 246–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E.
(1929) A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12 (3), 225–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke, D. S., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M.
(2014) Phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 1, 801. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seabold, S., & Perktold, J.
(2010) Statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with python. In van der Walt, S., & Jarrod Millman (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, Austin, Texas (pp. 92–96). Retrieved January 12, 2021, from http://​conference​.scipy​.org​/proceedings​/scipy2010​/seabold​.html. Crossref
Shinohara, K., & Kawahara, S.
(2010) A cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism: The images of size. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistic Society (pp. 396–410), Berkley, CA. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T. M., Luna, D., Lerman, D. B., & Liu, M.
(2012) Sound symbolism effects across languages: Implications for global brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(3), 275–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M.
(2018) Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25 (5), 1619–1643. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spence, C.
(2011) Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73 (4), 971–995. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svantesson, J.-O.
(2017) Sound symbolism: the role of word sound in meaning. WIREs Cognitive Science, 8 (5): e1441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarte, R. D.
(1974) Phonetic symbolism in adult native speakers of Czech. Language and Speech, 17 (1), 87–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1982) The relationship between monosyllables and pure tones: An investigation of phonetic symbolism. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21 (3), 352–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. D., Estes, Z.
(2011) Sound symbolic naming of novel objects is a graded function. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64 (12), 2392–2404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trask, L.
(1999) Language – The basics [2nd edition]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsur, R.
(1997) Sound affects of poetry: Critical impressionism, reductionism and cognitive poetics. Pragmatics and Cognition, 5 (2), 283–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Size–sound symbolism revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 38 (6), 905–924. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsur, R., & Gafni, C.
(2019) Methodological issues in the study of phonetic symbolism. Scientific Study of Literature, 9 (2), 195–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ultan, R.
(1978) Size-sound symbolism. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, and E. A. Moravesik (Eds.), Universals of human language – vol. 2: Phonology (pp. 525–568). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vannoni, E., & McElligott, A. G.
(2008) Low frequency groans indicate larger and more dominant fallow deer (Dama dama) males. PLoS One, 3 1: e3113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, C. D., & Pisanski, K.
(2016) Vocal indicators of dominance. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–6). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whissell, C.
(1999) Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: Evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of differing emotional tone. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89(1), 19–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, W. D.
(1867) Language, and the study of language: Twelve lectures on the principles of linguistic science. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Winter, B.
(2019) Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, M. & van Peer, W.
(2002) The sound of meaning. A study in phonetic iconicity. In J. Zerkowitz & S. Csabi (eds.). Textual Secrets (pp. 379–383). Budapest: Eötvös Lórand University Press.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M.
(2010) Sound symbolism in foreign language phonological acquisition. Research in Language, 8 1(2010), 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wrembel, M., & Rataj, K.
(2008) “Sounds like a rainbow”: Sound–colour mappings in vowel perception. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd ISCA Workshop on Experimental Linguistics: ExLing 2 (pp. 237–240). Athens, Greece: University of Athens.Google Scholar
Yazawa, K. & Kondo, M.
(2019) Acoustic characteristics of Japanese short and long vowels: Formant displacement effect revisited. In S. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia (pp. 671–675). Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association. Retrieved on May 6, 2020, from http://​www​.assta​.org​/proceedings​/ICPhS2019​/papers​/ICPhS​_720​.pdf
Yorkston, E., & Menon, G.
(2004) A sound idea: Phonetic effects of brand names on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 43–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, H.
(2012) A cross-linguistic study of sound-symbolism in children’s verb learning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13 (2), 232–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar