Article published In:
Scientific Study of LiteratureVol. 11:2 (2021) ► pp.223–265
The effects of reading narrative fiction on social and moral cognition
Two experiments following a multi-method approach
We present two experiments examining the effects of reading narrative fiction (vs. narrative non-fiction vs. expository non-fiction) on social and moral cognition, using a battery of self-report, explicit and implicit indicators. Experiment 1 (N = 340) implemented a pre-registered, randomized between-groups design, and assessed multiple outcomes after a short reading assignment. Results failed to reveal any differences between the three reading conditions on either social or moral cognition. Experiment 2 employed a longitudinal design. N = 104 participants were randomly assigned to read an entire book over seven days. Outcome variables were assessed before and after the reading assignment as well as at a one-week follow-up. Results did not show any differential development between the three reading conditions over time. The present results do not support the claim that reading narrative fiction is apt to improve our general social and moral cognition.
Keywords: fiction, narrative, social cognition, empathy, morality
Article outline
- Introduction
- Experiment 1
- Materials and methods
- Participants
- Reading stimuli
- Assessment tasks
- State affect
- Trait empathy
- Lifetime exposure to print
- Transportation
- Emotion recognition
- Implicit morality
- Theory of mind (ToM)
- Procedure
- Data analysis
- Results
- Discussion
- Experiment 2
- Materials and methods
- Participants
- Reading stimuli
- Assessment tasks
- Affective empathy
- Emotion recognition
- Implicit morality
- Prosocial behaviour
- Procedure
- Data analysis
- Results
- Discussion
- General discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Declaration of interest statement
- Open practices statement
- Notes
-
References
References
Abell, F., Happé, F., & Frith, U.
(2000) Do
triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal
development. Cognitive
Development,
15
(1), 1–16. 
Andreychik, M. R., & Migliaccio, N.
(2015) Empathizing
with others’ pain versus empathizing with others’ joy: Examining the separability of positive and negative empathy and their
relation to different types of social behaviours and social emotions. Basic and Applied Social
Psychology,
37
(5), 274–291.
Armstrong, C. L., & McAdams, M. J.
(2009) Blogs
of information: How gender cues and individual motivations influence perceptions of
credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication,
14
(3), 435–456.
Bakan, D.
(1966) The
duality of human existence. Rand McNally.
Baker, C. A., Peterson, E., Pulos, S., & Kirkland, R. A.
(2014) Eyes
and IQ: A meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and “Reading the Mind in the
Eyes”. Intelligence,
44
1, 78–92.
Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M.
(2013) How
does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional
transportation. PloS
one,
8
(1), e55341.
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S.
(2004) The
Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex
differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders,
34
(2), 163–175.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I.
(2001) The
“Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or
high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry,
42
(2), 241–251.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Jolliffe, A. T.
(1997) Is
there a” language of the eyes”? Evidence from normal adults, and adults with autism or Asperger
syndrome. Visual
Cognition,
4
(3), 311–331.
Barrett, T. W., & Scott, T. B.
(1989) Development
of the grief experience questionnaire. Suicide and Life-Threatening
Behavior,
19
(2), 201–215.
Bartz, J. A., & Lydon, J. E.
(2004) Close
relationships and the working self-concept: Implicit and explicit effects of priming attachment on agency and
communion. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin,
30
(11), 1389–1401.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting
linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical
Software,
67
(1), 1–48.
Benjamin, C. F., & Gaab, N.
(2012) What’s
the story? The tale of reading fluency told at speed. Human Brain
Mapping,
33
(11), 2572–2585.
Bierhals, A. J., Prigerson, H. G., Fasiczka, A., Frank, E., Miller, M., & Reynolds III, C. F.
(1996) Gender
differences in complicated grief among the elderly. OMEGA – Journal of Death and
Dying,
32
(4), 303–317.
Black, J. E.
(2019) An
IRT analysis of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test. Journal of Personality
Assessment,
101
(4), 425–433.
Black, J. E., & Barnes, J. L.
(2015) The
effects of reading material on social and non-social
cognition. Poetics,
52
1, 32–43.
(2021) Fiction
and morality: Investigating the associations between reading exposure, empathy, morality, and moral
judgment. Psychology of Popular
Media,
10
(2), 149–164.
Black, J. E., Capps, S. C., & Barnes, J. L.
(2018) Fiction,
genre exposure, and moral reality. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the
Arts,
12
(3), 328–340.
Blair, R. J., & Cipolotti, L.
(2000) Impaired
social response reversal: A case of ‘acquired
sociopathy’. Brain,
123
(6), 1122–1141.
Bloom, P.
(2016) Against
empathy: The case for rational compassion. Ecco.
Boyd, B.
(2009) On
the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Harvard University Press.
Breithaupt, F.
(2018) The
bad things we do because of empathy. Interdisciplinary Science
Reviews,
43
(2), 166–174.
Bubandt, N., & Willerslev, R.
(2015) The
dark side of empathy: Mimesis, deception, and the magic of alterity. Comparative Studies in
Society and History, 5–34.
Bukowski, W. M., Motzoi, C., & Meyer, F.
(2009) Friendship
as process, function, and outcome. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook
of peer interactions, relationships, and
groups (pp. 217–231). Guilford Press.
Calarco, N., Fong, K., Rain, M., & Mar, R. A.
(2017) Absorption
in narrative fiction and its possible impact on social
abilities. In F. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. H. Tan, K. Balint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative
absorption (pp. 293–313). John Benjamins.
Cates, C. B., & Nicolopoulou, A.
(2019) The
effects of bookreading with and without mental state themes on preschoolers’ theory of
mind. In E. Veneziano & A. Nicolopoulou (Eds.), Narrative,
literacy and other
skills (pp. 129–159). John Benjamins.
Chlebuch, N., Goldstein, T. R., & Weisberg, D. S.
(2020) Fact
or fiction?: Clarifying the relationship between reading and the improvement of social
skills. Scientific Study of
Literature,
10
(2), 167–192.
Cowan, D. G., Vanman, E. J., & Nielsen, M.
(2014) Motivated
empathy: The mechanics of the empathic gaze. Cognition and
Emotion,
28
(8), 1522–1530.
Cramer, D.
(1998) Close
relationships: The study of love and
friendship. London: Arnold.
Davis, M. H.
(1980) A
multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected
Documents in
Psychology,
10
1, 85.
(1983) Measuring
individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of
Personality and Social
Psychology,
44
1, 113–126.
Didion, J.
(2005) The
year of magical thinking. Alfred A. Knopf.
Ding, X. P., Wellman, H. M., Wang, Y., Fu, G., & Lee, K.
(2015) Theory-of-mind
training causes honest young children to lie. Psychological
Science,
26
(11), 1812–1821.
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C.
(2013) Reading
other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of
Literature,
3
(1), 28–47.
Dodd, J. L., Ocampo, A., & Kennedy, K. S.
(2011) Perspective
taking through narratives: An intervention for students with ASD. Communication Disorders
Quarterly,
33
(1), 23–33.
Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I.
(2018) Fiction
reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of
Experimental Psychology:
General,
147
(11), 1713–1727.
Dziobek, I., Rogers, K., Fleck, S., Bahnemann, M., Heekeren, H. R., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A.
(2008) Dissociation
of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test
(MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders,
38
(3), 464–473.
Eekhof, L. S., van Krieken, K., Sanders, J., & Willems, R. M.
(2021) Reading
minds, reading stories: Social-cognitive abilities affect the linguistic processing of narrative
viewpoint. Frontiers in
Psychology,
12
1, 698986.
Emerson, R. W.
(1850) Representative
men: Seven lectures. Harvard University Press.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E.
(2013) Social
cognition: From brains to culture. Sage.
Friend, S.
(2008) Imagining
fact and fiction. In K. Stock, & K. Thomson-Jones (Eds.), New
waves in
aesthetics (pp. 150–169). Palgrave Macmillan.
(2012) VIII –
Fiction as a Genre. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society (Vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 179–209). Blackwell.
(2014) Believing
in stories. In G. Currie, M. Kieran, A. Meskin, & J. Robson (Eds.), Aesthetics
and the sciences of
mind (pp. 227–248). Oxford University Press.
Gamio, M.
(1930) Mexican
immigration to the United States. University of Chicago Press.
Genette, G.
(1980) Narrative
discourse. Cornell University Press.
Graesser, A. C., Magliano, J. P., & Haberlandt, K.
(1994) Psychological
studies of naturalistic text. Advances in Discourse
Processes,
53
1, 9–34.
Grande, R.
(2006) Across
a hundred mountains. Washington Square Press.
(2012) The
distance between us. Washington Square Press.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M.
(2003) What
do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository
text? In A. P. Sweet, & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking
reading
comprehension (pp. 82–98). Guilford.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
(2000) The
role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and
Social
Psychology,
79
(5), 701–721.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L.
(1998) Measuring
individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of
Personality and Social
Psychology,
74
(6), 1464–1480.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R.
(2003) Understanding
and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of
Personality and Social
Psychology,
85
(2), 197–216.
Gustafson, D.
(1989) Grief. Noûs,
23
(4), 457–479.
Hakemulder, J.
Harkrader, M. A., & Moore, R.
(1997) Literature
preferences of fourth graders. Literacy Research and
Instruction,
36
(4), 325–339.
Heider, F., & Simmel, M.
(1944) An
experimental study of apparent behaviour. The American Journal of
Psychology,
57
(2), 243–259.
Hill, S.
(1974) In
the springtime of the year. Hamish Hamilton.
Hofmann, W., & Baumert, A.
(2010) Immediate
affect as a basis for intuitive moral judgement: An adaptation of the affect misattribution
procedure. Cognition and
Emotion,
24
(3), 522–535.
Ilgunaite, G., Giromini, L., & Di Girolamo, M.
(2017) Measuring
empathy: A literature review of available tools. BPA-Applied Psychology Bulletin (Bollettino di
Psicologia
Applicata),
65
(280), 2–28.
Imuta, K., Henry, J. D., Slaughter, V., Selcuk, B., & Ruffman, T.
(2016) Theory
of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood: A meta-analytic review. Developmental
Psychology,
52
(8), 1192–1205.
Johnson, D. R., Cushman, G. K., Borden, L. A., & McCune, M. S.
(2013a) Potentiating
empathic growth: Generating imagery while reading fiction increases empathy and prosocial
behaviour. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the
Arts,
7
(3), 306–312.
Johnson, D. R., Jasper, D. M., Griffin, S., & Huffman, B. L.
(2013b) Reading
narrative fiction reduces Arab-Muslim prejudice and offers a safe haven from intergroup
anxiety. Social
Cognition,
31
(5), 578–598.
Johnson, S.
(1750) The
Rambler, No. 4 Saturday,
31 March 1750.
Joinson, C.
(1992) Coping
with compassion
fatigue. Nursing,
22
(4), 116–118.
Kellehear, A.
(2002) Grief
and loss: Past, present and future. The Medical Journal of
Australia,
177
(4), 176–177.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading
literary fiction improves theory of
mind. Science,
342
(6156), 377–380.
Kidd, D., & Castano, E.
(2019) Reading
literary fiction and theory of mind: Three preregistered replications and extensions of Kidd and Castano
(2013). Social Psychological and Personality
Science,
10
(4), 522–531.
Kidd, D., Ongis, M., & Castano, E.
(2016) On
literary fiction and its effects on theory of mind. Scientific Study of
Literature,
6
(1), 42–58.
Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., Richardson, C., Jampol, N., & Woodward, A.
(2011) The
accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of
mind. Cognition,
119
(2), 197–215.
Klimecki, O., & Singer, T.
(2012) Empathic
distress fatigue rather than compassion fatigue? Integrating findings from empathy research in psychology and social
neuroscience. In B. Oakley, A. Knafo, G. Madhavan, & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), Pathological
altruism (pp. 368–383). Oxford University Press.
Knowles, J.
(1959) A
separate peace. Simon & Schuster.
Koopman, E. M. E.
(2015) Empathic
reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective
responses. Poetics,
50
1, 62–79.
(2016) Effects
of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of
Aesthetics, Creativity, and the
Arts,
10
(1), 82–98.
Kucirkova, N.
(2019) How
could children’s storybooks promote empathy? A conceptual framework based on developmental psychology and literary
theory. Frontiers in
Psychology,
10
1, 121.
Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M.
(2015) Situation
models in naturalistic comprehension. In R. E. Willems (Ed.), Cognitive
neuroscience of natural language
use (pp. 59–76). Cambridge University Press.
Kuzmičová, A.
(2016) Does
it matter where you read? Situating narrative in physical environment. Communication
Theory,
26
(3), 290–308.
Lee, J. Y. S., & Imuta, K.
(2021) Lying
and theory of mind: A meta-analysis. Child
Development,
92
(2), 536–553.
Liu, A., & Want, S.
Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C.
(1991) A
three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary
text. Poetics,
20
(3), 193–232.
Małecki, W., Pawłowski, B., & Sorokowski, P.
(2016) Literary
fiction influences attitudes toward animal welfare. PLoS
one,
11
(12), e0168695.
Małecki, W., Sorokowski, P., Pawłowski, B., & Cieński, M.
(2019) Human
minds and animal stories: How narratives make us care about other
species. Routledge.
Mar, R. A.
(2018a) Evaluating
whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN)
framework. Discourse
Processes,
55
(5–6), 454–479.
(2018b) Stories
and the promotion of social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological
Science,
27
(4), 257–262.
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K.
(2008) The
function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on
Psychological
Science,
3
(3), 173–192.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., Dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B.
(2006) Bookworms
versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of
fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in
Personality,
40
(5), 694–712.
Mar, R. A., & Rain, M.
(2015) Narrative
fiction and expository non-fiction differentially predict verbal ability. Scientific Studies of
Reading,
19
1, 419–433.
Matravers, D.
(2014) Fiction
and narrative. Oxford University Press.
McCracken, J.
(2005) Falsely,
sanely, shallowly: Reflections on the special character of grief. International Journal of
Applied
Philosophy,
19
1, 139–56.
Michalska, K. J., Kinzler, K. D., & Decety, J.
(2013) Age-related
sex differences in explicit measures of empathy do not predict brain responses across childhood and
adolescence. Developmental Cognitive
Neuroscience,
3
1, 22–32.
Molinari, M. C., Barreyro, J. P., Cevasco, J., & van den Broek, P. W.
(2011) Generation
of emotional inferences during text comprehension: Behavioral data and implementation through the landscape
model. Escritos de
Psicología,
4
(1), 9–17.
Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J.
(2017) Leisure
reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the
Arts,
11
(1), 109–120.
(2019) How
does leisure reading affect social cognitive abilities?. Poetics
Today,
40
(3), 453–473.
Nussbaum, M. C.
(1990) Love’s
knowledge. Oxford University Press.
(1995) Poetic
justice: The literary imagination and public life. Beacon Press.
Oakley, B. F., Brewer, R., Bird, G., & Catmur, C.
(2016) Theory
of mind is not theory of emotion: A cautionary note on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes
Test. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology,
125
(6), 818–823.
Oltjenbruns, K. A.
(1991) Positive
outcomes of adolescents’ experience with grief. Journal of Adolescent
Research,
6
(1), 43–53.
Paludi, M. A., & Strayer, L. A.
(1985) What’s
in an author’s name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author’s
name. Sex
Roles,
12
(3–4), 353–361.
Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E.
(2016) Does
reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at
replication. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology,
111
(5), e46.
Perugini, M., & Leone, L.
(2009) Implicit
self-concept and moral action. Journal of Research in
Personality,
43
(5), 747–754.
Pino, M. C., & Mazza, M.
(2016) The
use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PloS
one,
11
(8), e0160254.
Ratcliffe, M.
(2017) Grief
and the unity of emotion. Midwest Studies in
Philosophy,
41
(1), 157–174.
Rowe, A. D., Bullock, P. R., Polkey, C. E., & Morris, R. G.
(2001) ‘Theory
of mind’ impairments and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe
excisions. Brain,
124
(3), 600–616.
Samur, D., Tops, M., & Koole, S. L.
(2018) Does
a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and
Castano (2013). Cognition and
Emotion,
32
(1), 130–144.
Schaeffer, Jean-Marie: Fictional vs. factual
narration
(2013) In Hühn, Peter et al. (eds.): The
living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. URL = [URL]
Schwab, R.
(1996) Gender
differences in parental grief. Death
Studies,
20
(2), 103–113.
Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. M.
(2014) Empathy
and compassion. Current
Biology,
24
(18), R875–R878.
Sirois, S., & Brisson, J.
(2014) Pupillometry. Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive
Science,
5
(6), 679–692.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F.
(1989) Exposure
to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research
Quarterly,
24
(4), 402–433.
Summers, K.
(2013) Adult
reading habits and preferences in relation to gender differences. Reference & User Services
Quarterly,
52
(3), 243–249.
Tamir, D. I., Bricker, A. B., Dodell-Feder, D., & Mitchell, J. P.
(2016) Reading fiction and reading minds: The role of simulation in the default network. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 215–224.
Telfer, E.
(1970) Friendship. Proceedings
of the Aristotelian Society,
71
1, new
series, 223–241.
Topping, K. J., Samuels, J., & Paul, T.
(2008) Independent
reading: The relationship of challenge, non-fiction and gender to achievement. British
Educational Research
Journal,
34
(4), 505–524.
Trilling, L.
(1950) The
liberal imagination. Anchor-Doubleday.
Tsunemi, K., Tamura, A., Ogawa, S., Isomura, T., & Masataka, N.
(2014) Intensive
exposure to narrative in story books as a possibly effective treatment of social perspective-taking in schoolchildren with
autism. Frontiers in
Psychology,
5
, 2.
Ugazio, G., Majdandžić, J., & Lamm, C.
(2014) Are
empathy and morality linked? Insights from moral psychology, social and decision neuroscience, and
philosophy. In H. L. Maibom (Ed.), Empathy
in
morality (pp. 155–171). Oxford University Press.
Vermeule, B.
(2010) Why
do we care about literary characters?. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Watkins, P.
(2000) Stand
before your god: An American schoolboy in England. Vintage Books.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A.
(1988) Development
and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of
Personality and Social
Psychology,
54
(6), 1063–1070.
Weinberg, D. B., & Kapelner, A.
(2018) Comparing
gender discrimination and inequality in indie and traditional publishing. PloS
one,
13
(4), e0195298.
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J.
(2001) Meta-analysis
of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child
Development,
72
(3), 655–684.
White, S. J., Coniston, D., Rogers, R., & Frith, U.
(2011) Developing
the Frith-Happé animations: A quick and objective test of Theory of Mind for adults with
autism. Autism
Research,
4
(2), 149–154.
Wimmer, L.
(2015) Das ästhetische Paradox bei der Verarbeitung von fiktionalen vs nicht-fiktionalen
Texten [The aesthetic paradox when processing fictional vs non-fictional
texts]. Dissertation, Heidelberg University [available at [URL]].
Worden, J. W.
(2003) Grief
counselling and grief therapy (3rd
edition). Brunner-Routledge.
Znoj, H. J.
(2015) Bereavement
and complicated grief across the lifespan. In J. Wright (Ed.), International
encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd
edition) (pp. 537–541). Elsevier.