Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 11:2 (2021) ► pp.196–222

Reading fiction with an e-book or in print

Purposes, pragmatics and practices. A focus group study

ORCID logo | University of Vienna
ORCID logo | University of Vienna
ORCID logo | University of Vienna
ORCID logo | University of Vienna
Empirical research on the differences between digital and print reading has recently increased, mainly concentrating on informational texts while disregarding literary texts. Concerning narrative fiction, the existing quantitative studies have found no or very few differences between reading printed books and e-books. In our focus group study, we amplify the perspective on digital and print book reading through a largely explorative approach. The results gained by interviewing 34 habitual readers of e-books in six groups show that e-books complement rather than replace printed books. Crucial differences can be found in the dimensions of the reading situation, genre selection, purpose of reading, as well as literary quality and status of the text. Furthermore, our results shed new light on the importance of the printed book as an individual material object, with its own specific iconicity and with notable consequences for intellectual possession, memory, and remembrance of read books and lived reading experiences.
Keywords: fiction reading, digitisation, focus groups, e-books vs. print, leisure reading, digital reading
Article outline
  • Theory and recent research
    • Preparation for reading
    • The act of reading
    • Effects of reading
  • Methodology
    • Focus group interviews
      • Participants
      • Questionnaire
      • Procedure
      • Coding
  • Analysis and findings
    • Preparation for reading
      • Resources: Access to material and price
      • Selection: Genres and reading medium
      • Purpose: Leisure or study
        • Print reading for study and digital reading for leisure
        • Digital reading for study and print reading for leisure
      • Circumstances: Travelling and public transport
    • The act of reading
      • Reading practices and reading situations
      • Ease of use: Comfort and readability
      • Immersion and reading experience
    • Effects of reading
      • Physical presence and intellectual possession
      • Memory and retention
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 2 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.21012.kos
References (52)
References
Andersen, T. R., Kjerkegaard, S., & Pedersen, B. S. (2021). Introduction: Modes of reading. Poetics Today, 42 (2), 131–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bäcker, I. (2014). Der Akt des Lesens – neu gelesen. Zur Bestimmung des Wirkungspotenzials von Literatur. München: Wilhelm Fink. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ballatore, A., & Natale, S. (2016). E-readers and the death of the book: Or, new media and the myth of the disappearing medium. New Media & Society, 18 (10), 2379–2394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balling, G., Begnum, A. C., Kuzmicova, A., & Schilhab, T. (2019). The young read in new places, the older read on new devices: A survey of digital reading practices among librarians and Information Science students in Denmark. Participations . Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 16 (1), 197–236.Google Scholar
Baron, N. S. (2017). Reading in a digital age. Phi Delta Kappan 99 (2), 15–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, N. S., Calixte, R. M., & Havewala, M. (2017). The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics and Informatics, 34 (5), 590–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedetto, S., Drai-Zerbib, V., Pedrotti, M., Tissier, G., & Baccino, T. (2013). E-readers and visual fatigue. PloS one, 8 (12). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus Groups in Social Research. London [u.a.]: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boelmann, J. (2009). Leseforschung. In J. Schneider, & R. Grundmann (Eds.), Methodengeschichte der Germanistik (pp. 309–321). de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, M. (2010). Literary Reading, Cognition and Emotion: An Exploration of the Oceanic Mind (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G., & Chartier, R. (1999). A History of Reading in the West. University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Chartier, R. (1995). Forms and Meanings. Texts, Performances, and Audiences from Codex to Computer. University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42 (2), 288–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Ambra, J., Wilson, C. S., & Akter, S. (2019). Affordance theory and e-books: evaluating the e-reading experience using netnography. Pers Ubiquit Comput 231, 873–892. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Debray, R. (2003). Einführung in die Mediologie. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Haupt.Google Scholar
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25 1, 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, N. (2002). Transkription: Ein Leitfaden mit Aufgaben für Studenten, Forscher und Laien (Qualitative Sozialforschung, 10). Opladen: Leske Budrich. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engelsing, R. (1974). Der Bürger als Leser. Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flick, U. (2002). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
Foy, J. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2014). Flying to Neverland: How readers tacitly judge norms during comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 42 (8), 1250–1259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graf, W. (2004). Der Sinn des Lesens. Modi der literarischen Rezeptionskompetenz. Münster: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Hilpert, J., Benighaus, L., & Scheel, O. (2012). Auswertung von Fokusgruppen mit MAXQDA am Beispiel des Projektes „Wahrnehmung der Fusionsenergie bei ausgewählten Bevölkerungsteilen“. In M. Schulz, B. Mack, & O. Renn (Eds.), Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft (pp. 170–194). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hupfeld, A., Sellen, A., O’hara, K., & Rodden, T. (2013). Leisure-based reading and the place of e-books in everyday life. In P. Kotzé, G. Marsden, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013 (pp. 1–18). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Illich, I. (2010). Im Weinberg des Textes. Als das Schriftbild der Moderne entstand. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Kaufman, G., & Flanagan, M. (2016). High-low split: Divergent cognitive construal levels triggered by digital and non-digital platforms. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2773–2777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123 1, 138–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, A., & Hagenhoff, S. (2015). Digitale Lesemedien. In U. Rautenberg, & U. Schneider (Eds.), Lesen. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (pp. 361–380). de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzmičová, A., Schilhab, T., & Burke, M. (2020). m-Reading: Fiction reading from mobile phones. Convergence, 26 (2), 333–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lange, S. (2019). Enhanced E-Books. Eine empirische Studie zum immersiven Erleben. J. B. Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lobin, H. (2014). Engelbarts Traum. Wie der Computer uns Lesen und Schreiben abnimmt. Campus.Google Scholar
Mangen, A. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: haptics and immersion. Journal of Research in Reading, 31 1, 404–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). The digitization of literary reading. Orbis Litterarum, 71 (3), 240–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D. (2014). Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4 (2), 150–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., & van der Weel, A. (2016). The evolution of reading in the age of digitisation: An integrative framework for reading research. Literacy, 50 1, 116–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., Olivier, G., & Velay, J-L. (2019). Comparing comprehension of a long text read in print book and on Kindle: Where in the text and when in the story? Frontiers in Psychology, 10 (38). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mole, T. (2019). The Secret Life of Books. Why They Mean More Than Words. Elliott and Thompson.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philipp, M. (2020). Multiple Dokumente verstehen. Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven auf Prozesse und Produkte des Lesens mehrerer Dokumente. Beltz.Google Scholar
Rautenberg, U. (2005). Das Buch in der Alltagskultur: Eine Annäherung an zeichenhaften Buchgebrauch und die Medialität des Buches. Studien der Erlanger Buchwissenschaft, 15 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosebrock, C. (2020). Netzlektüre und Deep Reading: Entmischungen der Lesekultur. Leseforum Schweiz, 2 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
Schneider, U. (2018). The social dimension of the printed book as a medium. TXT – The Book Issue: Social Symbolism, 4 1, 119–126.Google Scholar
Schilhab, T., Balling, G., & Kuzmičová, A. (2018). Decreasing materiality from print to screen reading. First Monday, 23 (10). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwabe, A., Brandl, L., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Stocker, G. (2020). Literatur am Bildschirm – Zum Stand der empirischen Leseforschung. Orbis Litterarum, 75 (5), 213–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Experiencing literature on the e-reader: The effects of narrative texts on screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 44 (2), 319–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spence, C. (2020). The multisensory experience of handling and reading books. Multisensory Research, 33 (8), 902–928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stocker, G. (2015). Aufgewacht aus tiefem Lesen. Überlegungen zur Medialität des Bücherlesens im digitalen Zeitalter. In H.-C. von Herrmann, J. Moser (Eds.): Lesen. Ein Handapparat (pp. 33–48). Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Olave, M. A. T. (2020). Book love. A cultural sociological interpretation of the attachment to books. Poetics, 81 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittmann, R. (2010). Geschichte des deutschen Buchhandels. Beck.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World. Harper.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1993). Aspects of literary comprehension. A cognitive Approach. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Antonini, Alessio, Sam Brooker & Lovro Škopljanac
2024. Spontaneous transmedia co-location: Integration in memory. Memory, Mind & Media 3 DOI logo
Hakemulder, Frank & Anne Mangen
2024. Literary Reading on Paper and Screens: Associations Between Reading Habits and Preferences and Experiencing Meaningfulness. Reading Research Quarterly 59:1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Vuorinen, Pauliina Tea Eleonoora, Benjamin W. Tatler & Frank Keller
2024. Tracking e-reading behavior: uncovering the effects of task context, electronic experience, and motivation. Frontiers in Education 8 DOI logo
Kosch, Lukas, Günther Stocker, Annika Schwabe & Hajo G. Boomgaarden
2023. Bücher am Bildschirm. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 53:3 ► pp. 761 ff. DOI logo
Schwabe, Annika, Lukas Kosch, Hajo G. Boomgaarden & Günther Stocker
2023. Book readers in the digital age: Reading practices and media technologies. Mobile Media & Communication 11:3 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
van de Ven, Inge, Frank Hakemulder & Anne Mangen
2023. ‘TL;DR’ (Too Long; Didn’t Read)? Cognitive Patience as a Mode of Reading: Exploring Concentration and Perseverance. Scientific Study of Literature 12:1 ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Price, Hazel
2022. The year’s work in stylistics 2021. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.