Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 12:1/2 (2022) ► pp.103–132

An intricate dance of intersubjectivity

The social and cognitive benefits of a digital shared reading group

ORCID logo | Lund University Lund
| Lund University Lund
ORCID logo | Lund University Lund
ORCID logo | Lund University Lund
| Lund University Lund
ORCID logo | Lund University Lund
This article deepens the understanding of characteristic features of Shared Reading (SR) that can shed light on health benefits of this literary practice suggested by previous research. We provide a detailed analysis of language, interaction, reading strategies and collaborative meaning-making in an online SR group in which participants read and discussed a modernist poem. We triangulate our analysis with results from a focus group with the participants. Our study is informed by psychological theories about joint attention and its effects on social cohesion, mentalisation and perspective-taking. The analysis shows how the SR format provides a space in which ingroupness, intersubjectivity, and perspective-taking are created and realised in language use and interaction. Furthermore, our study suggests that many characteristic features of SR identified in earlier research can still be observed in an online SR group. The study lays the ground for more conclusive research of the benefits of this reading practice.
Keywords: shared reading, collaborative meaning-making, joint attention, perspective-taking, social cohesion
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Theory
  • Data and method
  • Analysis of SR session
  • Results from the focus group discussion
  • Connecting the analyses
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 13 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.22010.gus
References
Anker, E. S. & Felski, R.
(red.) (2017) Critique and postcritique. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Billington, J., Humphreys, A.-L., Jones, A. & McDonnell, K.
(2016) A literature-based intervention for people with chronic pain. Arts & Health, 8 (1), 13–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billington, J., Farrington, G., Lampropoulou, S., Lingwood, J., Jones, A., Ledson, J., McDonnell, K., Duirs, N., & Humphreys, A. L.
(2017) A comparative study of cognitive behavioural therapy and shared reading for chronic pain. Medical Humanities, 43 (3), 155–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billington, J. & Steenberg, M.
(2021) Literary Reading and Mental Wellbeing. In: D. Kuiken & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Handbook of Empirical Literary Studies (pp. 393–420). De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boland, L., Campbell, D., Rzeczkowska, K., Fazekas, M., & Gillanders, D.
(2021) An experimental investigation of the effects of perspective-taking on emotional discomfort, cognitive fusion and self-compassion. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 20 1(April), 27–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, K.
(1994) Complete poems. (D. McDuff, Trans.) Bloodaxe Books.Google Scholar
Bu, F., Steptoe, A., & Fancourt, D.
(2020) Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health, 186 1(September), 31–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colle, L., Dimaggio, G., Carcione, A., Giuseppe, N., Semerari, A., & Chiavarino, C.
(2020) Do competitive contexts affect mindreading performance? Frontiers in Psychology, 11 (1284). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C.
(2013) Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3 (1), 28–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowrick, C., Billington, J., Robinson, J., Hamar, A., & Williams, C.
(2012) Get into Reading as an intervention for common mental health problems: exploring catalysts for change. Medical Humanities, 38 (1), 15–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
(2007) The Stance Triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction (pp. 139–182). John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S.
(2018) Lend Me Your Ears: Mass Observing Contemporary Adult Reading Aloud Practices. Changing English, 25 (4), 410–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. & Freeman, M.
(2020) Adults reading aloud: A survey of contemporary practices in Britain. British Journal of Educational Studies 68 (1), 97–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eilan, N.
(2005) Joint Attention, Communication, and Mind. In N. Eilan, C. Hoerl, T. McCormack & J. Roessler (Eds.) Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology (pp.1–34). Oxford Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J., & Sidnell, J.
(2021) Intersubjectivity is activity plus accountability. In N. Gontier, A. Lock & C. Sinha (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution (pp. 1–39). Oxford Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felski, R.
(2008) Uses of literature. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) The limits of critique. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuller, D. & Rehberg Sedo, D.
(2013) Reading beyond the book: the social practices of contemporary literary culture. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, E., Kiemle, G., Davis, P., & Billington, J.
(2016) Making sense of mental health difficulties through live reading: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of being in a Reader Group. Arts and Health 8 (3), 248–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groarke, J. M., McGlinchey, E., McKenna-Plumley, P. E., Berry, E., Graham-Wisener, L., & Armour, C.
(2021) Examining temporal interactions between loneliness and depressive symptoms and the mediating role of emotion regulation difficulties among UK residents during the COVID-19 lockdown: Longitudinal results from the COVID-19 psychological wellbeing study. Journal of Affective Disorder, 285 1, 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D. I.
(2001) The task of poetry reading and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 22 (3), 295–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartley, J. & Turvey, S.
(2002) The reading groups book. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hodge, S., Robinson, J., & Davis, P.
(2007) Reading between the lines: the experiences of taking part in a community reading project. Medical Humanities, 33 (2), 100–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodges, S. D., Clark, B. A., & Myers, M. W.
(2011) Better living through perspective taking. In R. Biswas-Diener (Ed.), Positive psychology as social change (pp. 193–218). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D., Ongis, M. & Castano, E.
(2016) On literary fiction and its effects on theory of mind. Scientific Study of Literature, 6 (1), 42–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longden, E., Davis, P., Billington, J., Lampropoulou, S., Farrington, G., Magee, F., Walsh, E., & Corcoran, R.
(2015) Shared Reading: assessing the intrinsic value of a literature-based health intervention. Medical Humanities, 41 (2), 113–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longden, E., Davis, P., Carroll, J., Billington, J. & Kinderman, P.
(2016) An evaluation of shared reading groups for adults living with dementia: preliminary findings. Journal of Public Mental Health, 15 (2), 75–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCormick, K.
(1994) The culture of reading and the teaching of English. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G.
(2009) Rethinking Reading Comprehension Instruction: A Comparison of Instruction for Strategies and Content Approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44 (3), 218–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merriam, S. B., & Kee, Y.
(2014) Promoting Community Wellbeing: The Case for Lifelong Learning for Older Adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 64 (2), 128–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
(1994) Foregrounding, Defamiliarization, and Affect: Response to Literary Stories. Poetics, 22 (5), 389–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moll, H., & Meltzoff, A. N.
(2011) Perspective-taking and its foundation in joint attention. In J. Roessler, H. Lerman, & N. Eilan (Eds.), Perception, Causation, and Objectivity (286–304). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narushima, M.
(2008) More than nickels and dimes: the health benefits of a community-based lifelong learning programme for older adults. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27 (6): 673–692. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrby, C.
(2014) Samtalsanalys. Så gör vi när vi talar med varandra. Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, A.
(2022) Shared Reading som litteraturperformance. In: T. Forslid, A. Ohlsson, K. Rydbeck, K. I. Skjerdingstad, M. Steenberg, & T. M. Tangerås (Eds.). Shared Reading i Skandinavia: Forskning og praxis (pp. 63–85). ABM-Media AS.Google Scholar
O’Madagain, C., & Tomasello, M.
(2021) Joint attention to mental content and the social origin of reasoning. Synthese, 198 (5), 4057–4078. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olin-Scheller, C., Tengberg, M., & Lindholm, A.
(2015) Lässtrategier i rörelse. Att undervisa om elevers tolkande läsförmåga. In M. Jönsson & A. Öhman (Eds.), Litteratur och läsning: Litteraturdidaktikens nya möjligheter (pp. 129–149). Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Peplow, D., Swann, J., Trimarco, P., & Whiteley, S.
(2015) The discourse of reading groups: integrating cognitive and sociocultural perspectives. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peplow, D.
(2016) Talk about books: a study of reading groups. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Rennung, M., & Göritz, A. S.
(2015) Facing Sorrow as a Group Unites. Facing Sorrow in a Group Divides. PLoS ONE, 10 (9), Article e0136750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scotti, M. E., & Orsenigo, J.
(2022) A window to the outside: The Reading Group as defense, meeting and resistance: An exploratory study of the experience of reading groups during the first lockdown (March–May 2020). Encyclopaideia, 26 (62), 17–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skjerdingstad, K. I., & Tangerås, T. M.
(2019) Shared reading as an affordance-nest for developing kinesic engagement with poetry: A case study. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 6 (1), Article 1688631. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steenberg, M., Christiansen, C., Dalsgård, A. L., Stagis, A. M., Moeslund Ahlgren, L., Lykkegaard Nielsen, T., & Ladegaard, N.
(2021) Facilitating Reading Engagement in Shared Reading. Poetics Today, 42 (2), 229–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steensig, J.
(2019) Conversation Analysis and Affiliation and Alignment. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 1–6). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(1995) Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P. J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 103–130). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Turner, R., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F.
(2020) Fiction effects on social cognition: Varying narrative engagement with cognitive load. Scientific Study of Literature, 10 (1), 94–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W.
(1986) Stylistics and psychology: investigations of foregrounding. Croom Helm.Google Scholar
van Peer, W., Sopčák, P., Castiglione, D., Fialho, O., Jacobs, A., & Hakemulder, F.
(2021) Foregrounding. In D. Kuiken & A. Jacobs (Eds.). Handbook of empirical literary studies (pp. 145–176). De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. H. G., Waiter, G. D., Perra, O., Perett, D. I., & Whiten, A.
(2005) An fMRI study of joint attention experience. NeuroImage, 25 (1), 133–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolf, W., Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M.
(2016) Joint attention, shared goals, and social bonding. British Journal of Psychology, 107 (2), 322–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolf, W. & Tomasello, M.
(2020) Watching a video together creates social closeness between children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 189 1(January), 104712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar