Scientific Study of Literature

Volume 3, Issue 1 (2013)

2013.  iv, 168 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 31 May 2013
Table of Contents
Editor’s introduction
Willie van Peer
1
What’s your problem? And how might we deepen it?
Brian Boyd
3–7
A rationale for evolutionary studies of literature
Joseph Carroll
8–15
Toward consilience, not literary Darwinism
Jonathan Gottschall
16–18
Extending Literary Darwinism: Culture and alternatives to adaptation
Jan Verpooten
19–27
Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy
Maja Djikic, Keith Oatley and Mihnea C. Moldoveanu
28–47
Exploring the metanarrative of the traditional literary critical essay
Laurie Grobman and Joanna K. Garner
48–76
Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab-Muslims
Dan Johnson
77–92
The fluency of spoilers: Why giving away endings improves stories
Jonathan D. Leavitt and Nicholas J.S. Christenfeld
93–104
Using affective appraisal to help readers construct literary interpretations
Sarah Levine and William S. Horton
105–136
Action speaks louder than words: Empathy mainly modulates emotions from theory of mind-laden parts of a story
Mikkel Wallentin, Arndis Simonsen and Andreas Højlund Nielsen
137–153
Review of Claassen (2012): Author representations in literary reading
Reviewed by Gerhard Lauer
154–157
Review of Hogan (2003): The mind and its stories. Narrative universals and human emotion & Hogan (2011): What literature teaches us about emotion & Hogan (2011): Affective narratology. The emotional structure of stories
Reviewed by Willie van Peer
158–160
Review of Ramachandran (2011): The tell-tale brain: A neuroscientist’s quest for what makes us human
Reviewed by Willie van Peer
161–164
Review of Schreier (2012): Qualitative content analysis in practice
Reviewed by Cathelein Aaftink
165–168
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Mar, Raymond A.
2018. Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes 55:5-6  pp. 454 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Communication Studies

Communication Studies

Literature & Literary Studies

Theoretical literature & literary studies