Scientific Study of Literature 3:1
[Scientific Study of Literature, 3:1] 2013. iv, 168 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Editor’s introductionWillie van Peer | p. 1
-
What’s your problem? And how might we deepen it?Brian Boyd | pp. 3–7
-
A rationale for evolutionary studies of literatureJoseph Carroll | pp. 8–15
-
Toward consilience, not literary DarwinismJonathan Gottschall | pp. 16–18
-
Extending Literary Darwinism: Culture and alternatives to adaptationJan Verpooten | pp. 19–27
-
Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathyMaja Djikic, Keith Oatley & Mihnea C. Moldoveanu | pp. 28–47
-
Exploring the metanarrative of the traditional literary critical essayLaurie Grobman & Joanna K. Garner | pp. 48–76
-
Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab-MuslimsDan R. Johnson | pp. 77–92
-
The fluency of spoilers: Why giving away endings improves storiesJonathan D. Leavitt & Nicholas J.S. Christenfeld | pp. 93–104
-
Using affective appraisal to help readers construct literary interpretationsSarah Levine & William S. Horton | pp. 105–136
-
Action speaks louder than words: Empathy mainly modulates emotions from theory of mind-laden parts of a storyMikkel Wallentin, Arndis Simonsen & Andreas Højlund Nielsen | pp. 137–153
-
E. Claassen. 2012. Author representations in literary readingReviewed by Gerhard Lauer | pp. 154–157
-
P. C. Hogan. 2003. The mind and its stories. Narrative universals and human emotion, . 2011 What literature teaches us about emotion & . 2011 Affective narratology. The emotional structure of storiesReviewed by Willie van Peer | pp. 158–160
-
V. S. Ramachandran. 2011. The tell-tale brain: A neuroscientist’s quest for what makes us humanReviewed by Willie van Peer | pp. 161–164
-
M. Schreier. 2012. Qualitative content analysis in practiceReviewed by Cathelein Aaftink | pp. 165–168
Miscellaneous
Articles
Book reviews
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Mar, Raymond A.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.