Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 4:1 (2014) ► pp.4667
References
Altmann, G.T.M., & Kamide, Y
(1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D
(2011) Corpus linguistics and the study of literature: Back to the future? Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 15–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J.V., & Elbro, C
(2003) The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 681–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chwilla, D.J., & Kolk, H.H.J
(2002) Three-step priming in lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 30(2), 217–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denhiere, G., Lemaire, B., Bellissens, C., & Jhean-Larose, S
(2007) A semantic space for modeling children’s semantic memory. In T.K. Landauer, D.S. McNamara, S. Dennis & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 143–166). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M
(2011) The scientific study of literature: What can, has, and should be done. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 59–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunst, C.J., Simkus, A., & Hamby, D.W
(2012) Effects of reading to infants and toddlers on their early language development. Center for Early Literacy Learning, 5(4), 1–7.Google Scholar
Elman, J.L
(1991) Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Mach. Learn., 7(2-3), 195–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fincher-Kiefer, R
(1995) Relative inhibition following the encoding of bridging and predictive inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 981–995. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Encoding differences between bridging and predictive inferences. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 225–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foltz, P.W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T.K
(1998) The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2-3), 285–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A.C., & McNamara, D.S
(2011) Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 371–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A.C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T
(1994) Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, T.L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J.B
(2007) Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114(2), 211–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hare, M., Jones, M., Thomson, C., Kelly, S., & McRae, K
(2009) Activating event knowledge. Cognition, 111(2), 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, K.A., Balota, D.A., Cortese, M.J., & Watson, J.M
(2008) Predicting semantic priming at the item level. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(7), 1036–1066.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inohara, K., & Kusumi, T
(2012) Effect of reading habits on vocabulary: examination by latent semantic analysis. Cognitive studies : bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 191, 100–121.Google Scholar
Iseki, R
(2006) Which regulates on-line inference generation in text comprehension, coherence or accessibility? Cognitive studies : bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 131, 205–224.Google Scholar
Jones, M.N., Kintsch, W., & Mewhort, D.J.K
(2006) High-dimensional semantic space accounts of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(4), 534–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, M.N., & Mewhort, D.J.K
(2007) Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114(1), 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G.T.M., & Haywood, S.L
(2003) The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keefe, D.E., & McDaniel, M.A
(1993) The timecourse and durability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(4), 446–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D.C., & Castano, E
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W
(1998) Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition: Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
(2000) Metaphor comprehension: a computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(2), 257–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Predication. Cognitive Science, 25(2), 173–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Bowles, A.R
(2002) Metaphor comprehension: what makes a metaphor difficult to understand? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(4), 249–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kudo, T
(2005) MeCab: yet another part-of-speech and morphological analyzer. Retrieved from [URL]
Landauer, T.K., & Dumais, S.T
(1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W., & Laham, D
(1998) An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2-3), 259–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lund, K., & Burgess, C
(1996) Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 28(2), 203–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magliano, J.P., Baggett, W.B., Johnson, B.K., & Graesser, A.C
(1993) The time course of generating causal antecedent and causal consequence inferences. Discourse Processes, 16(1-2), 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R
(1986) Inferences about predictable events. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 12(1), 82–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D.S
(2011) Science in the perspective of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 7–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mol, S.E., & Bus, A.G
(2011) To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics. (
2009) Modern Japanese balanced written language corpus 2009 monitor edition. Retrieved from: [URL]Google Scholar
Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P
(2005) Children’s implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76(2), 324–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A
(2001) Implicit learning out of the lab: the case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 401–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, G.R., Keenan, J.M., & Golding, J.M
(1988) Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: lexical decision versus naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(4), 399–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quesada, J
(2007) Creating your own LSA space. In T.K. Landauer, D.S. McNamara, S. Dennis & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 71–85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schmalhofer, F., McDaniel, M.A., & Keefe, D
(2002) A unified model for predictive and bridging inferences. Discourse Processes, 33(2), 105–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senechal, M
(2006) Testing the home literacy model: parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(1), 59–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E
(1986) Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 360–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E., & West, R.F
(1998) Literacy experiences and the shaping of cognition. Global prospects for education: Development, culture, and schooling, 253–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F
(1989) Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swanborn, M.S.L., & de Glopper, K
(1999) Incidental word learning while reading: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 261–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swanborn, M.S.L., & De Glopper, K
(2002) Impact of reading purpose on incidental word learning from context. Language Learning, 52(1), 95–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Utsumi, A
(2011) Computational exploration of metaphor comprehension processes using a semantic space model. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 251–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Peer, W
(2011) Introduction. Scientific Study of Literature 1(1), 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, M.B.W
(2005) Memory for narrative and expository text: independent influences of semantic associations and text organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(2), 359–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, M.B.W., Magliano, J.P., & Larsen, B
(2005) Causal and semantic relatedness in discourse understanding and representation. Discourse Processes,39(2-3), 165–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zacks, J.M., Speer, N.K., & Reynolds, J.R
(2009) Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 307–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zacks, J.M., & Swallow, K.M
(2007) Event segmentation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 80–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R.A
(1994) Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R.A., & Radvansky, G.A
(1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar