Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 4:1 (2014) ► pp. 89122
References

References

Balakrishnan, B., & Sundar, S.S.
(2011) Where am I? How can I get there? Impact of navigability and narrative transportation on spatial presence. Human–Computer Interaction, 26(3), 161–204.Google Scholar
Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R.W.
(2008) Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 508–529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, W.F., & Lichtenstein, E.H.
(1982) Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6 (5-6), 473–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
(2009) Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M.
(1988) The flow experience and its significance for human psychology, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.
(2001) Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duchan, J.F., Bruder, G.A., & Hewitt, L.E.
(1995) Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale.Google Scholar
Field, A.
(2005) Discovering Statistics using SPSS. Second Edition.Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R.J.
(1993) Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C.
(2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, M.C., Brock, T.C. & Kaufman, G.F.
(2004) Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 4, 311–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, M.C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J.
(2008) Transportation across media: Repeated exposure to print and film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J.F.
(2004) Foregrounding and its effect on readers. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A.E., & Bracken, C.C.
(2011) “I really liked that movie”: Testing the relationship between trait empathy, transportation, perceived realism, and movie enjoyment. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23(2), 90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A., & Zwarun, L.
(2012) Challenging entertainment: Enjoyment, transportation, and need for cognition in relation to fictional films viewed online. Mass Communication and Society, 15(3), 384–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knobloch, S., Patzig, G., Mende, A.M., & Hastall, M.
(2004) Affective news effects of discourse structure in narratives on suspense, curiosity, and enjoyment while reading news and novels. Communication Research, 31(3), 259–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M.M. & Miall, D.S.
(2011) Bodily Involvement in Literary Reading: An Experimental Study of Readers’ Bodily Experiences during Reading. In F. Hakemulder (Eds.), De Stralende Lezer. Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek naar de Invloed van het Lezen (pp. 160–174).Delft: Eburon, IGEL.Google Scholar
Lee, K.M.
(2004) Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D.S., & Kuiken, D.
(1995) Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29(1), 37–58.Google Scholar
Nabi, R.L., & Krcmar, M.
(2004) Conceptualizing media enjoyment as attitude: Implications for mass media effects research. Communication Theory, 14(4), 288–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nell, V.
(1988) Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, M.B. & Bartsch, A.
(2010) Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36, 53–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ravaja, N.
(2004) Contributions of Psychophysiology to Media Research: Review and Recommendations. Media Psychology, 6, 193–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segal, E.M.
(1995) Narrative comprehension and the role of deictic shift theory. Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, 3–17.Google Scholar
Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J.
(2010) Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamborini, R., Bowman, N.D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Organ, A.
(2010) Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 758–777. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tan, E.S., & Fasting, B.T.
(1996) Emotion and the structure of narrative film: Film as an emotion machine. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G.
(1974) Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vorderer, P., Wulff, H.J., & Friedrichsen, M.
(1996) Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wolf, W.
(2004) Aesthetic illusion as an effect of fiction. Style-FayetteVille, 38(3), 325.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R.A.
(2003) The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 35–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 57 other publications

Alber, Jan, Jessica Jumpertz & Axel Mayer
2020. How professional readers process unnatural narrators. Scientific Study of Literature 10:2  pp. 193 ff. Crossref logo
Auracher, Jan & Hildegard Bosch
2016. Showing with words. Scientific Study of Literature 6:2  pp. 208 ff. Crossref logo
Avramova, Yana R., Nathalie Dens & Patrick De Pelsmacker
2021. Brand placement across media: The interaction of placement modality and frequency in film versus text. Journal of Business Research 128  pp. 20 ff. Crossref logo
Bell, Alice, Astrid Ensslin, Isabelle van der Bom & Jen Smith
2019. A reader response method not just for ‘you’. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:3  pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo
Bilandzic, Helena & Rick Busselle
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Boot, Peter & Marijn Koolen
2020. Captivating, splendid or instructive?. Scientific Study of Literature 10:1  pp. 66 ff. Crossref logo
Bálint, Katalin, Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Miruna M. Doicaru & Ed S. Tan
2016. Reconceptualizing foregrounding. Scientific Study of Literature 6:2  pp. 176 ff. Crossref logo
Bálint, Katalin, Moniek M. Kuijpers & Miruna M. Doicaru
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 177 ff. Crossref logo
Calarco, Navona, Katrina Fong, Marina Rain & Raymond Mar
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 293 ff. Crossref logo
Carpenter, Jordan M., Melanie C. Green & Kaitlin Fitzgerald
2018. Mind-reading motivation. Scientific Study of Literature 8:2  pp. 211 ff. Crossref logo
CHUNG-FAT-YIM, ASHLEY, ELENA CILENTO, EWELINA PIOTROWSKA & RAYMOND A. MAR
2019. Are stories just as transporting when not in your native tongue?. Language and Cognition 11:2  pp. 285 ff. Crossref logo
de Hoop, Helen & Kim Schreurs
2018.  In Pronouns in Literature,  pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo
Deane, Paul
2020. Building and Justifying Interpretations of Texts: A Key Practice in the English Language Arts. ETS Research Report Series 2020:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Dixon, Peter & Marisa Bortolussi
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo
Eekhof, Lynn S., Anita Eerland, Roel M. Willems, Monica Gonzalez-Marquez & Rolf Zwaan
2018. Readers’ Insensitivity to Tense Revealed: No Differences in Mental Simulation During Reading of Present and Past Tense Stories. Collabra: Psychology 4:1 Crossref logo
Eekhof, Lynn S., Moniek M. Kuijpers, Myrthe Faber, Xin Gao, Marloes Mak, Emiel van den Hoven & Roel M. Willems
2021. Lost in a Story, Detached from the Words. Discourse Processes 58:7  pp. 595 ff. Crossref logo
Gerrig, Richard J., Kelsey A. Bagelmann & Micah L. Mumper
2016. On the Origins of Readers' Outcome Preferences. Discourse Processes 53:8  pp. 603 ff. Crossref logo
Hartung, Franziska, Peter Withers, Peter Hagoort & Roel M. Willems
2017. When Fiction Is Just as Real as Fact: No Differences in Reading Behavior between Stories Believed to be Based on True or Fictional Events. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Herrmann, Björn & Ingrid S. Johnsrude
2020. Absorption and Enjoyment During Listening to Acoustically Masked Stories. Trends in Hearing 24  pp. 233121652096785 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2016. The scientific study of literary experience and neuro-behavioral responses to literature. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1  pp. 164 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M. & Jana Lüdtke
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M., Jana Lüdtke, Arash Aryani, Burkhard Meyer-Sickendieck & Markus Conrad
2016. Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Karam, Khaled Mostafa & Helmy Elfiel
2020. An experimental study of the effect of close reading versus casual reading of social drama on the stimulation of the cognitive capacity of empathy. Scientific Study of Literature 10:1  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Keen, Suzanne
2018.  In A Companion to Literary Theory,  pp. 126 ff. Crossref logo
Knoop, Christine A., Valentin Wagner, Thomas Jacobsen & Winfried Menninghaus
2016. Mapping the aesthetic space of literature “from below”. Poetics 56  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M.
2021.  In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36],  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M., Frank Hakemulder, Katalin Bálint, Miruna M. Doicaru & Ed S. Tan
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Kuiken, Don & Shawn Douglas
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka
2016. Does it Matter Where You Read? Situating Narrative in Physical Environment. Communication Theory 26:3  pp. 290 ff. Crossref logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Anne Mangen, Hildegunn Støle & Anne Charlotte Begnum
2017. Literature and readers’ empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:2  pp. 137 ff. Crossref logo
Lin, Xi
2020. The Engaged Spectator: Reading BL Novels in Contemporary China. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 13:2  pp. 233 ff. Crossref logo
Mak, Marloes, Clarissa de Vries, Roel M. Willems, Rolf Zwaan & Valentina Bambini
2020. The Influence of Mental Imagery Instructions and Personality Characteristics on Reading Experiences. Collabra: Psychology 6:1 Crossref logo
Mak, Marloes & Roel M. Willems
2019. Mental simulation during literary reading: Individual differences revealed with eye-tracking. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34:4  pp. 511 ff. Crossref logo
Mak, Marloes & Roel M. Willems
2021. Eyelit: Eye Movement and Reader Response Data During Literary Reading. Journal of Open Humanities Data 7 Crossref logo
Mangen, Anne, Anne Charlotte Begnum, Anežka Kuzmičová, Kersti Nilsson, Mette Steenberg & Hildegunn Støle
2018. Empathy and literary style. Orbis Litterarum 73:6  pp. 471 ff. Crossref logo
Mangen, Anne, Gérard Olivier & Jean-Luc Velay
2019. Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story?. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Mangen, Anne & Adriaan van der Weel
2017. Why don’t we read hypertext novels?. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 23:2  pp. 166 ff. Crossref logo
Menninghaus, Winfried, Valentin Wagner, Julian Hanich, Eugen Wassiliwizky, Thomas Jacobsen & Stefan Koelsch
2017. The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 Crossref logo
Montoro, Rocío
2015. The Year’s Work in stylistics 2014. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 24:4  pp. 355 ff. Crossref logo
Pianzola, Federico
2021. Presence, flow, and narrative absorption questionnaires: a scoping review. Open Research Europe 1  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Pianzola, Federico
2021. Presence, flow, and narrative absorption questionnaires: a scoping review. Open Research Europe 1  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Pianzola, Federico, Katalin Bálint & Jessica Weller
2019. Virtual reality as a tool for promoting reading via enhanced narrative absorption and empathy. Scientific Study of Literature 9:2  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Pianzola, Federico, Giuseppe Riva, Karin Kukkonen & Fabrizia Mantovani
2021. Presence, flow, and narrative absorption: an interdisciplinary theoretical exploration with a new spatiotemporal integrated model based on predictive processing. Open Research Europe 1  pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Pianzola, Federico, Giuseppe Riva, Karin Kukkonen & Fabrizia Mantovani
2021. Presence, flow, and narrative absorption: an interdisciplinary theoretical exploration with a new spatiotemporal integrated model based on predictive processing. Open Research Europe 1  pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Poerio, Giulia & Peter Totterdell
2020. The Effect of Fiction on the Well-Being of Older Adults: A Longitudinal RCT Intervention Study Using Audiobooks. Psychosocial Intervention 29:1  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Rebora, Simone, Peter Boot, Federico Pianzola, Brigitte Gasser, J Berenike Herrmann, Maria Kraxenberger, Moniek M Kuijpers, Gerhard Lauer, Piroska Lendvai, Thomas C Messerli & Pasqualina Sorrentino
2021. Digital humanities and digital social reading. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36:Supplement_2  pp. ii230 ff. Crossref logo
Samur, Dalya, Mattie Tops, Ringailė Slapšinskaitė & Sander L. Koole
2021. Getting lost in a story: how narrative engagement emerges from narrative perspective and individual differences in alexithymia. Cognition and Emotion 35:3  pp. 576 ff. Crossref logo
Shastina , Elena , Stephanie Jentgens, Olga Shatunova , Anatoly Borisov & Galina Bozhkova
2020. Role of Literary Pedagogy in Modern Education of Preschool and Primary School Children . Space and Culture, India 8:1  pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo
Starr, G. Gabrielle
2018.  In A Companion to Literary Theory,  pp. 408 ff. Crossref logo
Stockwell, Peter
2019.  In Experiencing Fictional Worlds [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 32],  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Tan, Ed S., Miruna M. Doicaru, Frank Hakemulder, Katalin Bálint & Moniek M. Kuijpers
2017.  In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27],  pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Thompson, Jacqueline M., Ben Teasdale, Sophie Duncan, Evert van Emde Boas, Felix Budelmann, Laurie Maguire & Robin I. M. Dunbar
2018. Individual Differences in Transportation into Narrative Drama. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 210 ff. Crossref logo
Trompenaars, Thijs
2018. Empathy for the inanimate. Linguistics in the Netherlands 35  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
Usée, Franziska, Arthur M. Jacobs & Jana Lüdtke
2020. From Abstract Symbols to Emotional (In-)Sights: An Eye Tracking Study on the Effects of Emotional Vignettes and Pictures. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo
van den Hoven, Emiel, Franziska Hartung, Michael Burke & Roel M. Willems
2016. Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Style During Literary Reading: Insights from Eye-Tracking. Collabra 2:1 Crossref logo
Vries, Clarissa de, W. Gudrun Reijnierse & Roel M. Willems
2018. Eye movements reveal readers’ sensitivity to deliberate metaphors during narrative reading. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo
Vroegh, Thijs, Sandro L. Wiesmann, Sebastian Henschke & Elke B. Lange
2021. Manual motor reaction while being absorbed into popular music. Consciousness and Cognition 89  pp. 103088 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.