Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp. 178195
References

References

Andringa, E.
(1996) Effects of “narrative distance” on readers’ emotional involvement and response. Poetics 23(6), 431–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aubry, T.R.
(2011) Reading as therapy: What contemporary fiction does for middle-class Americans. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Boot, P.
(2011, October). Towards a genre analysis of online book discussion: Socializing, participation and publication in the Dutch booksphere. Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers Conference, Seattle, WA.
(2012) Literary evaluation in online communities of writers and readers. Scholarly Research Communications 3(2), 1–8. Retrieved from: http://​src​-online​.caGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
(1991) Questions of method. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, & G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 19–36). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
(1993) The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature (R. Johnson, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P.
(1996) The effects of formal training on literary reception. Poetics 23(6), 471–487. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burke, W.M.
(1991) Border crossings in Marilynne Robinson’s Housekeeping . Modern Fiction Studies 37(4), 716–724. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J.
(2010) Bring on the books for everybody: How literary culture became popular culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Earthman, E.A.
(1992) Creating the virtual work: Reader’s processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English 26(4), 351–384.Google Scholar
Geyh, P.E.
(1993) Burning down the house? Domestic space and feminine subjectivity in Marilynne Robinson’s “Housekeeping”. Contemporary Literature 34(1), 103–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gleed, A.
(2014) Booktrust reading habits survey 2013: A national survey of reading habits and attitudes to books amongst adults in England. Retrieved from the Booktrust website: http://​www​.booktrust​.org​.uk
Greenblatt, S.
(1988) Shakespearean negotiations: The circulation of social energy in renaissance England. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1995) Culture. In F. Lentricchia & T. McLaughlin (Eds.), Critical terms for literary study (pp. 225–232). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Janssen, S.
(1997) Reviewing as social practice: Institutional constraints on critics’ attention for contemporary fiction. Poetics 24(5), 275–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keen, S.
(2007) Empathy and the novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirkby, J.
(1986) Is there life after art? The metaphysics of Marilynne Robinson’s Housekeeping . Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature 5(1), 91–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCrum, R.
(2003, October 12). The 100 greatest novels of all time: The list. The Observer. Retrieved from http://​www​.guardian​.co​.ukGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K.
(1999) Meetings of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification, in reading fiction. Poetics 26(5), 439–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M.
(2005) Housekeeping. London: Faber & Faber. (Original work published 1980).Google Scholar
Ryan, M.
(1991) Marilynne Robinson’s “Housekeeping”: The subversive narrative and the new American Eve. South Atlantic Review 56(1), 79–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M.-L.
(2005) Tellability. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory (pp. 589–591). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sanford, A.J., & Emmott, C.
(2012) Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, A.
(2008) Private criticism in the public space: Personal writing on literature in readers’ reviews on Amazon. Particip at tions 5(2). Retrieved from http://​www​.participations​.orgGoogle Scholar
Verboord, M.
(2011) Cultural products go online: Comparing the Internet and print media on distributions of gender, genre and commercial success. Communications 36(4), 441–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) The impact of peer-produced criticism on cultural evaluation: A multilevel analysis of discourse employment in online and offline film reviews. New Media & Society 16(6), 921–940. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vipond, D., & Hunt, R.A.
(1984) Point-driven understanding: Pragmatic and cognitive dimensions of literary reading. Poetics 13(3), 261–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
What is the best work of American fiction of the last 25 years?
(2006, May 21). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://​www​.nytimes​.comGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Thelwall, Mike
2017. Book genre and author gender: Romance>Paranormal-Romance to Autobiography>Memoir. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68:5  pp. 1212 ff. Crossref logo
Thelwall, Mike
2019. Reader and author gender and genre in Goodreads. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51:2  pp. 403 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.