Article published In:
Scientific Study of LiteratureVol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp.196–210
Amazing but true
A preference for fiction-like non-fiction
People find it important to know if a story is factual, but still the most popular stories, in such forms as books and movies, are fictional. Research suggests that a story being true may add value to the reader’s experience, but other findings suggest that fiction may increase enjoyment by providing fewer disruptions to narrative comprehension. In three studies we explored the appeal of stories when they are presented as fiction or as non-fiction. Subjects read (1) story synopses, (2) vignettes from two popular websites, or (3) narratives on relationships and war. Results indicate that readers preferred stories when they were presented, externally, as non-fiction. Readers also preferred stories that seemed internally — that is, because of how they were written — like fiction. Additionally the results suggested that readers rely more heavily on factual stories to update their notions of reality. This study contributes to a body of literature on reader enjoyment in relation to truth labels made explicit or implicit in narratives as well as on the efficacy of arts-based research.
Keywords: non-fiction, fiction, narrative, reading enjoyment
References (37)
All-Time Box Office: World-Wide. (2012). Retrieved from IMBd website: [URL]
Appel, M., & Maleckar, B. (2012). The Influence of paratext on narrative persuasion: Fact, fiction, or fake? Human Communication Research, 381, 459–484. 
Bastone, W., Ed. (2006, January 6). A million little lies. Retrieved from The Smoking Gun website: [URL].
Baumeister, R.F., Zhang, L., & Vohs, K.D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 81, 111–121.
Bohr, H. (1967). My Father. In S. Rozental (Ed.), Niels Bohr: His life and work as seen by his friends and colleagues. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Chenier, T., & Winkielman, P. (2009). The origins of aesthetic pleasure: processing fluency and affect in judgment, body, and the brain. In M. Skov & O. Vartanian (Eds.), Neuroaesthetics (pp. 275–289). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Co.
Frey, J. (2005). A million little pieces. New York: Anchor.
Grabianowski, E. (2012). The 21 best-selling books of all time. Retrieved from HowStuffWorks website: [URL]
Gerrig, R.J., & Prentice, D.A. (1991). The representation of fictional information. Psychological Science, 21, 336–340.
Giesman, H., & Misiewicz, J. (2001). Surviving reality television. (Honors thesis). Ball State University, Indiana.
Graesser, A.C., Olde, B., & Klettke, B. (2002). How does the mind construct and represent stories? In M.C. Green, J.J. Strange, & T.C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 229–262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hanauer, D.I. (2010). Poetry as research: Exploring second language poetry writing (Vol. 91). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Harvey Jr., L.O. (2003). Living with uncertainty in an uncertain world: Signal detection theory in the real world. In J. Andre, D.A. Owens, & L.O. Harvey Jr. (Eds.), Visual perception: The influence of H. W. Leibowitz (Decade of behavior) (pp. 23–41). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2003). When is conceptual change intended? A cognitive-sociocultural view. In G.M. Sinatra, & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hekkert, P. (2006). Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in product design. Psychology Science, 48(2), 157–172.
Hendersen, D.J.O., & Clark, H. (2007). Retelling narratives as fiction or non-fiction. In D.S. McNamara, & G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 353–358). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Hoover, Kevin D. (2012). Pragmatism, perspectival realism, and econometrics. In A. Lehtinen, Jaakko Kuorikoski and Petri Ylikoski (Eds.), Economics for real: Uskali Mäki and the place of truth in economics (pp. 223–240). London: Routledge.
Hunter, I.E., & Hunter, R.F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 961, 72–98.
Kagan, J. (2003). Surprise and uncertainty. In B.A. Maher, M.F. Lenzenweger, & J.M. Hooley (Eds.), Principles of experimental psychopathology: Essays in honor of Brendan A. Maher (pp. 245–253). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kroft, S. (2011, April 15). Questions over Greg Mortenson’s stories. Retrieved from CBS News website: [URL].
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 951, 489–508.
Marshall, B.J., & Warren, J.R. (1984). Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet, 11, 1311–1315.
Mar, R.A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 31, 173–192.
McDonald, J.B. (2012, February 21). In the Details: Review of The Lifespan of a Fact, by John D’Agata and Jim Fingal. New York Times, BR1.
Mortenson, G. & Relin, D.O. (2006). Three cups of tea. New York: Viking.
Nisbett, R.E., Zukier, H., & Lemley, R. (1981). The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the impact of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology, 131, 248–277.
Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 31, 101–117.
Pihlainen, K. (2002). The moral of the historical story: Textual differences in fact and fiction. New Literary History, 331, 39–60.
Prentice, D.A., Gerrig, R.J., & Bailis, D.S. (1997). What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 41, 416–420.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 81, 364–382.
Richert, R.A., & Smith, E.I. (2011). Preschoolers’ quarantining of fantasy stories. Child Development, 821, 1106–1119.
Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986.) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Stelter, B. (2012, March 16). ‘This American Life’ retracts episode on Apple’s suppliers in China. New York Times.
Strange, J.J., & Leung, C.C. (1999). How anecdotal accounts in news and in fiction can influence judgments of a social problem’s urgency, causes, and cures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 251, 436–449.
Taylor, B., Miller, E., Farrington, C.P., Petropoulos, M.C., Favot-Mayaud, I., Li, J., & Waight, P.A. (1999). Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association. Lancet, 3531, 2026–2029.
Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, E.W. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N.L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Deane, Paul, Swapna Somasundaran, René R. Lawless, Hilary Persky & Colleen Appel
2019. The Key Practice, Building and Sharing Stories and Social Understandings: The Intrinsic Value of Narrative. ETS Research Report Series 2019:1 ► pp. 1 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.