How literary can literariness be?
Methodological problems in the study of foregrounding
In literary theory, there are two common proposals about the nature of literature: that literariness is a distinctive characteristic of literary texts and that literariness is mostly characterized by highly foregrounded textual features. Our studies focused on the effects of genre expectations. In two experiments, we examined whether particular rhetorical figures (features, such as oxymora, synesthesia, and personification) are processed differently when readers think they are embedded in literary sentences. Participants were first induced to think that the sentences they were reading were taken either from literary texts (literary group) or from newspaper articles (news group). They then read sentences containing rhetorical figures and control sentences that did not contain figurative language. Results of Experiment 1 were consistent with prior research indicating that genre expectations influence how a text is processed (Zwaan, 1991, 1994). Moreover, specifically in the news group, genre expectations similarly affect reading times for sentences with rhetorical figures and sentences containing low frequency and long words, suggesting that foregrounding presents a lexical challenge elicited by micro-level linguistic and rhetorical “obstacles.” However, Experiment 2 did not replicate the findings of Experiment 1. These conflicting results prompt consideration of the limitations of an exclusive focus on foregrounding; in literary texts there is always an interchange between backgrounding and foregrounding elements.
References
Ablali, D
(
2006)
Écrire en critique: Exploration morpho-syntaxique sur corpus. In
C. Duteil &
B. Foulquié (Eds.),
Corpus en Lettres et Sciences sociales: des documents numériques à l’interprétation. Actes du colloque international d’Albi, juillet 2006 (pp. 207–214). Paris, France: Editeru Textot. Retrieved from
[URL]
Altmann, G
(
2013)
Aspects of word length. In
R. Köhler &
G. Altmann (Eds.),
Issues in quantitativel linguistics, 31, 23–38. Lüdenscheid, Deutschland: RAM.

Altmann, U., Bohrn, I.C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M
(
2012)
Fact vs fiction—how paratextual information shapes our reading processes.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 22–29.


Bakhtin, M
(
1984)
Problems of Dostoesvsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.


Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P
(
2003)
Psychonarratology. Foundations for the empirical study of literary response. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Hohlfeld, A., Jacobs, A.M., & Kliegl, R
(
2011)
Co-registration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: Analyses and review.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 552–572.


Eagleton, T
(
1983)
Literary theory: An introduction. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Eco, U
(
1979)
Lector in fabula. Milano, Italia: Bompiani.

Fish, S
(
1980)
Is there a text in this class. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Forgacs, B., Bohrn, I.C., Baudewig, J., Hofmann, M.J., Pleh, C., & Jacobs, A.M
(
2012)
Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun-noun compound words.
Neuroimage, 63(3), 1432–1442.


Grzybek, P
(
2014)
Word Length. In:
Taylor, John R. (Ed.),
The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1–25.


Grzybek, P., & Altmann, G
(
2002)
Oscillation in the frequency-length relationship.
Glottometrics, 61, 97–107.

Grzybek, P., & Stadlober, E
(
2007)
Do we have problems with Arens’ law? A new look at the sentence-word relation. In
P. Grzybek &
R. Köhler (Eds.),
Exact methods in the study of language and text. Dedicated to Gabriel Altmann on the occasion of his 75th birthday (pp. 205–217). Berlin, Deutschland: Mouton de Gruyter.


Grzybek, P., Stadlober, E., & Kelih, E
(
2007)
The relationship of word length and sentence length. The Inter-Textual Perspective. In
R. Decker &
H.-J. Lenz (Eds.),
Advances in data analysis (pp. 611–618). Berlin, Deutschland: Springer.


Hanauer, D
(
1998)
The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: Reading poetry and reading encyclopedic items.
Poetics, 26(2), 63–80.


Hanauer, D
(
1996)
Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgments.
Poetics, 231, 363–380.


Hoffstaedter, P
(
1986)
Poetizität aus der Sicht des Lesers. Eine empirische Untersuchung der Rolle von Text-, Leser- und Kontexteigenschaften bei der poetischen Verarbeitung von Texten. Hamburg, Deutschland: H. Buske.

Hofmann, M.J., & Jacobs, A.M
(
2014)
Interactive activation and competition models and semantic context: From behavioral to brain data.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46(1), 85–104.


Hutzler, F., Braun, M., Vo, M.L.H., Engl, V., Hofmann, M., Dambacher, M., et al.
(
2007)
Welcome to the real world: Validating fixation-related brain potentials for ecologically valid settings.
Brain Research, 11721, 124–129.


Iser, W
(
1976)
The act of reading. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Jacobs, A.M
(
2011)
Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: Elements of a model of literary reading). In
R. Schrott, &
A.M. Jacobs (Eds.),
Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (pp. 492–450). München, Deutschland: Hanser.

Jacobs, A.M
(
2013)
Neurocognitive model of literary reading. Retrieved from
[URL]
Jakobson R
(
1987)
Language in literature (
K. Pomorska &
S. Rudy, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Jauss H.R
(
1967)
Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft. Konstanz, Deutschland: Universität Konstanz.

Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A., & Wooley, J.D
(
1982)
Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228–238.


Kao J., Ryan R., Dye M., & Ramscar M
(
2010)
An acquired taste: How reading literature affects sensitivity to word distributions when judging literary texts.
Proceedings of the 32nd Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
, Portland, OR. Retrieved from
[URL]
Karlgren, J., & Cutting, D
(
1994)
Recognizing text genres with simple metrics using discriminant analysis proceeding COLING ‘94.
Proceedings of the 15th conference on Computational linguistics
, 21, 1071–1075.

Kneepkens, L.J., & Zwaan, R.A
(
1994)
Emotion and cognition in literary understanding.
Poetics, 231, 125–138.


Kuiken, D. Philipps, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D.S., Verbitsky, M., & Tonkonogy, A
(
2004)
Locating self-modyfying feelings within literary reading.
Discourse processes, 381, 267–286.


Leech, G., & Short, M
(
2007)
Style in fiction. A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.

Levin, S.R
(
1963)
Deviation–statistical and determinate–in poetic language.
Lingua 121, 276–290.


Lüdtke, J., Meyer-Sickendieck, B., & Jacobs, A.M
(
2014),
Immersing in the stillness of an early morning: Testing the mood empathy hypothesis of poetry reception.
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 363–377.


McQuarrie, E.F., & Mick, D.G
(
1996)
Figures of rhetoric in advertising language.
Journal of Consumer Research, 191, 424–437.


Meutsch, D
(
1987)
Literatur verstehen. Eine empiristische Studie. Wiesbaden, Deutschland: Vieweg & Teubner.


Miall, D., & Kuiken, D
(
1994),
Foregrounding, defamiliarization and affect, Response to literary stories.
Poetics, 221, 389–407.


Miall, D., & Kuiken, D
(
1998)
The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness.
Poetics, 251, 327–341.


Miall, D., & Kuiken, D
(
1999)
What is literariness? Three components of literary reading.
Discourse Processes, 281, 121–138.


Mukarovský, J
(
1932/1964)
Standard language and poetic language. In
P.L. Garvin (Ed.),
A Prague School Reader on aesthetics, literary structure, and style. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Sanford, A., & Emmott, C
(
2012)
Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.


Sanford, A.J, Dawydiak, E., & Emmott
(
2006)
External and internal sources of attention control: Findings from change detection. Poster presented at the
meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse
. Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Schmidt, S
(
1980)
Grundriß der empirischen Literaturwissenschaft. Wiesbaden, Deutschland: Vieweg & Teubner.

Sereno, S.C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M
(
1998)
Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials.
NeuroReport, 91, 2195–2200.


Shklovsky, V
(
1917/1965)
Art as technique. In
L.T. Lemon &
M.J. Reis (Eds.),
Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Sopčák, P
(
2007)
Creating from nothing. A foregrounding study of James Joyce’s drafts for Ulysses.
Language and Literature, 161, 183–196.


Stockwell, P
(
2002)
Cognitive poetics. An introduction. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Van Dijk, T
(
1979)
Advice on theoretical poetics.
Poetics, 81, 569–608.


van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J, & Zygnier, S
(
2007)
Lines on feeling: Foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning.
Language and Literature, 16(2), 197–213.


van Peer, W., & Hakemulder, J.F
(
2006)
Foregrounding. In
K. Brown (Ed.),
Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.


van Peer, W
(
1986)
Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London, United Kingdom: Croom Helm.

Vespignani, F., Egidi, G., & Salgaro, M
(
2013)
Literary attitude affects lexical access, Escop (Eighteenth Meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology)
, Budapest 29 August – 1 September.

Xiao, Z., & McEnery, A
(
2005)
Two approaches to genre analysis: Three genres in modern American English.
Journal of English Linguistics, 33(1), 62–82.


Winko, S., Jannidis, F., & Lauer, G
(
2009)
Grenzen der Literatur. Zu Begriff und Phänomen des Literarischen. Berlin, Deutschland: de Gruyter.


Yong, B.L., & Myaeng, S.H
(
2002)
Text genre classification with genre-revealing and subject-revealing features. In
Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
, 145–150.
Zwaan, R
(
1991)
Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation.
Poetics, 201, 139–156.


Zwaan, R
(
1994)
Effects of Genre Expectations on Text Comprehension.
Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933.


Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Bruhn, Mark J.
Form, Sven
2019.
Reaching Wuthering Heights with Brave New Words: The Influence of Originality of Words on the Success of Outstanding Best‐Sellers.
The Journal of Creative Behavior 53:4
► pp. 508 ff.

Jacobs, Arthur M.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.