Article published In:
Scientific Study of LiteratureVol. 6:2 (2016) ► pp.208–242
Showing with words
The influence of language concreteness on suspense
Jan Auracher | Konan University Kobe, Japan | Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Germany
In the current study, we explored the hypothesis that the level of language concreteness influences readers’ emotional involvement and, thus, fosters the evocation of suspense. To this end, 141 suspenseful texts with comparable content were assessed altogether by 1226 participants on items referring to emotional involvement and suspense. A concreteness score per text was calculated from the ratio between concrete and abstract verbs. Additionally, participants were asked to provide personal data, such as sex, age, or reading habits, and to answer items referring to their ability to feel empathy (trait empathy). Applying a stepwise multiple regression analysis we found that language concreteness is one significant predictor for emotional involvement and suspense (next to affinity for suspense and trait empathy). These results are discussed with respect to their implications on the nature of suspense and on the so-called paradox of suspense.
Keywords: emotional involvement, absorption, suspense, concrete language, embodiment
References
Andringa, E.
(1996) Effects of narrative distance on readers emotional involvement and response. Poetics, 231, 431–452. 
Appel, M., Koch, E., Schreier, M., & Groeben, N.
(2002) Aspekte des Leseerlebens: Skalenentwicklung. [Assessing experiential states during reading: Scale development]. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 141, 149–154.
Auracher, J.
(2007) Psychophysiologische Messungen zur Textwirkung [Psychophysiological measurments of text elicited affect]. Baden Baden: DWV.
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G., & Iacoboni, M.
(2006) Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology, 161, 1818–1823.
Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M.
(2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS One, 81, e55341.
Barber, H. A., Kousta, S. T., Otten, L. J., & Vigliocco, G.
(2010) Event-related potentials to event-related words: Grammatical class and semantic attributes in the representation of knowledge. Brain Research, 13321, 65–74.
Barsalou, L. W.
(2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 591, 617–645.
Bigazzi, S., & Nencini, A.
(2008) How evolutions construct identities: the psycholinguistic model of evolution. In O. Vincze & S. Bigazzi (Eds.), Élmény, történet: A történetek élménye [engl.: Experience, story – Experience of stories] (pp. 91–105). Budapest, Hungary: Új Mandátum Könyvkiadó.
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L.
(2009) Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 191, 2767–2796.
Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F.
(2014) Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. New York, NY: Springer.
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P.
(2003) Psychonarratology: Foundations for the empirical study of literary response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bortolussi, M., Dixon, P., & Sopcak, P.
(2010) Gender and reading. Poetics, 381, 299–318.
Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F.
(2009) Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 191, 1905–1914.
Boulenger, V., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A.
(2006) Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 181, 1607–1615.
Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H.
(1982) Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 473–486.
Bruner, J.
(1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
(2009) Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 121, 321–347.
Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M. C., Mazziotta, J. C., & Lenzi, G. L.
(2005) Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. In J. T. Cacioppo & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Social Neuroscience (pp. 143–152). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Carroll, N.
(1996) The paradox of suspense. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 71–92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chatman, S.
(1978) Story and discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Christov-Moore, L., Simpson, E.A., Coudé, G., Grigaityte, K., Iacoboni, M., & Ferrari, P.F.
(2014) Empathy: gender effects in brain and behavior. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 461, 604–627.
Comisky, P., & Bryant, J.
(1982) Factors involved in generating suspense. Human Communication Research, 91, 49–58.
Cupchik, G. C.
(1996) Suspense and disorientation: Two poles of emotionally charged literary uncertainty. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 189–198). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cupchik, G. C., & László, J.
(1994) The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action. Cognition and Emotion, 81, 297–312.
Dalla Volta, R, Fabbri-Destro, M., Gentilucci, M., & Avanzini, P.
(2014) Spatiotemporal dynamics during processing of abstract and concrete verbs: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 611, 163–174.
de Vignemont, F., & Singer, T.
(2006) The emphatic brain: how, when, and why? Trends in Cognitive Science, 101, 435–441.
Dimberg, U., & Thunberg, M.
(2012) Empathy, emotional contagion, and rapid facial reactions to angry and happy facial expressions. PsyCh Journal, 11, 118–127.
Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M.
(1996) Literary communication: Effects of reader-narrator cooperation. Poetics, 231, 405–430.
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C., & Leung, A.
(1993) Literary processing and interpretation: Towards empirical foundations. Poetics, 221, 5–33.
Ferrari, G. R. F.
(1999) Aristotle’s literary aesthetics. Phronesis, 441, 181–198.
Fliessbach, K., Weis, S., Klaver, P., Elger, C. E., & Weber, B.
(2006) The effect of word concreteness on recognition memory. Neuro-Image, 321, 1413–1421.
Fogassi, L., & Ferrari, P. F.
(2007) Mirror neurons and the evolution of embodied language. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 161, 136–141.
Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G.
(2005) Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science, 3081, 662–667.
Forster, E. M.
(2002 / 1927) Aspects of the Novel. New York, NY: RosettaBooks.
Gallese, G., & Goldmann, A.
(1998) Mirror-neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 493–501.
Gallese, V.
(2003) The roots of empathy: The shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 361, 171–180.
(2008) Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 31, 317–333.
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G.
(2004) A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 81, 396–403. .
.Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G.
(2005) The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 221, 455–479.
Gerrig, R. J.
(1989) Suspense in the absence of uncertainty. Journal of Memory and Language, 281, 633–649.
Gerrig, R. J., & Bernardo, A. B. I.
(1994) Readers as problem-solvers in the experience of suspense. Poetics, 221, 459–472.
Glenberg, A., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G.
(2008) Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 611, 905–919.
Green, M. C.
(2004) Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 381, 247–266.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
(2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 791, 701–721.
Hakemulder, J., & Koopman, E.
(2010) Readers closing in on immoral characters’ consciousness. Effects of free indirect discourse on response to literary narratives. Journal of Literary Theory, 41, 41–62.
Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F.
(2004) Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 211, 191–201.
Hauk, O., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F.
(2008) The time course of action and action-word comprehension in the human brain as revealed by neurophysiology. Journal of Physiology – Paris, 1021, 50–58.
Holcomb, P.J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J.E., & West, W.C.
(1999) Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 721–742.
Iacoboni, M.
(2009) Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 601, 653–670.
Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J., & Rizzolatti, G.
(2005) Grasping the intentions of others with one’s owns mirror neuron system. PLOS Biology, 31, 529–535.
Jacobs, A. M.
(2015) Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In Roel M. Willems (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use. (pp. 135–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
James, C. T.
(1975) The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 130–136.
Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., & Walton, A.
(2008) Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 661, 641–661.
Jessen, F., Heun, R., Erb, M., Granath, D. O., Klose, U., Papassotiropoulos, A., & Grodd, W.
(2000) The concreteness effect: Evidence for dual coding and context availability. Brain and Language, 741, 103–112.
Johnson, B. K., & Rosenbaum, J. E.
(2014) Spoiler alert: Consequences of narrative spoilers for dimensions of enjoyment, appreciation, and transportation. Communication Research, 411, 1–21.
Jose, P. E.
(1989) The role of gender and gender role similarity in readers’ identification with story characters. Sex roles, 211, 697–713.
Jose, P. E., & Brewer, W. F.
(1984) Development of story liking: Character identification, suspense, and outcome resolution. Developmental Psychology, 201, 911–924.
Keen, S.
(2006): A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 141, 207–236.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 3421, 377–380.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Keplinger, C.
(2007) Thrilling news: Factors generating suspense during news exposure. Media Psychology, 91, 193–210.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Patzig, G., Mende, A. M., & Hastall, M.
(2004) Affective news: Effects of discourse structure in narratives on suspense, curiosity, and enjoyment while reading news and novels. Communication Research, 311, 259–287.
Koopman, E. M.
(2015) Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 501, 62–79.
(2016) Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 101, 82–98.
Kotovych, M., Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., & Holden, M.
(2011) Textual determinants of a component of literary identification. Scientific Study of Literature, 11, 260–291.
Kreibich, H., & Schäfer, C.
(2008) Lesen in Deutschland 2008: Hintergründe, Zielsetzungen, zentrale Ergebnisse [Reading in Germany 2008: Background, objektives, primary results]. In Stiftung Lesen (Ed.), Lesen in Deutschland 2008 [Reading in Germany 2008]. Mainz: Stiftung Lesen.
Kroll, J. F., & Merves, J. S.
(1986) Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 121, 92–107.
Kuijpers, M. M., & Miall, D. S.
(2011) Bodily involvement in literary reading: An experimental study of readers’ bodily experiences during reading. In F. Hakemulder (Ed.), De Stralende Lezer. Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek naar de Invloed van het Lezen [The radiant reader; scientific studies of the influence of reading]. (pp. 160–174). Delft: Eburon.
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M.
Lehne, M., & Koelsch, S.
(2015) Toward a general psychological model of tension and suspense. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Art. 79.
Lehne, M., Engel, P., Rohrmeier, M., Menninghaus, W., Jacobs, A. M., & Koelsch, S.
(2015) Reading a suspenseful literary text activates brain areas related to social cognition and predictive inference. PlosOne, 101, e0124550.
Leibetseder, M., Laireiter, A. R., Riepler, A., & Köller, T.
(2001) E-Skala: Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Empathie – Beschreibung und psychometrische Eigenschaften [E-Scale: Questionnaire for the assessment of empathy: Description and psychometric properties]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 221, 70–85.
Lodge, D.
(1992) The Art of Fiction: Illustrated from Classic and Modern Texts. London: Penguin.
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A.
(2008) A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology – Paris, 1021, 59–70.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B.
(2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 401, 694–712.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B.
(2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 341, 407–428.
Mazzocco, P. J., Green, M. C., Sasota, J. A., & Jones, N. W.
(2010) This story is not for everyone: Transportability and narrative persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, 361–368.
Miall, D. S.
(2009a) Neuroaesthetics of literary reading. In M. Skov & O. Vartanian (Eds.), Neuroaesthetics (pp. 233–247). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
(2009b) Enacting the other: Towards an aesthetics of feeling in literary reading’. In A. Lang (Ed.), Reading the Readers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
(1994) Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 221, 389–407.
Moseley, R. L., Carota, F., Hauk, O., Mohr, B., & Pulvermüller, F.
(2011) A role for the motor system in binding abstract emotional meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 221, 1634–1647.
Oatley, K.
(1994) A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and the theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 231, 53–74.
(1999) Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 31, 101–117.
Odağ, Ö.
(2011) Reading engagement. A matter of biological sex alone? Scientific Study of Literature, 21, 292–325.
Paivio, A.
(1986) Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
(1991) Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 451, 255–287.
Palagi, E., Nicotra, V., & Cordoni, G.
(2015) Rapid mimicry and emotional contagion in domestic dogs. Royal Society Open Science, 21, 150505.
Panksepp, J.
(1998) Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Preston, S., & de Waal, F. B. M.
(2002) Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 251, 1–72. .
.Prieto-Pablos, J. A.
(1998) The paradox of suspense. Poetics, 261, 99–113.
Pulvermüller, F.
(2005) Opinion: Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature, 61, 576–582.
Pulvermüller, F., Fadiga, L.
(2010) Active perception: Sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Review Neuroscience, 111, 351–360.
Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y.
(2006) Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Progress in Neurobiology, 791, 49–71.
Radford, C.
(1975) How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 491, 67–80.
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L.
(2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 271, 169–192.
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C.
(2008) Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions, emotions, and experience. Oxford University Press.
Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J., Gennari, S. P., Davies, R., & Cuetos, F.
(2010) Neural correlates of abstract verb processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 231, 106–118.
Sakreida, K., Scorolli, C., Menz, M. M., Heim, S., Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F.
(2013) Are abstract action words embodied? An fMRI investigation at the interface between language and motor cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Art. 125.
Schneider, S.
(2002) The paradox of fiction. In J. Fieser & B. Dowden (Eds.), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: [URL] (25.08.2015)
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W. M.
(1991) Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory and Cognition, 201, 96–104.
Scorolli, C., Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Nicoletti, R., Riggio, L., & Borghi, A. M.
(2011) Abstract and concrete sentences, embodiment, and languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Art. 227.
Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K.
(1991) The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 1–30.
Singer, T., & Lamm, C.
(2009) The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 11561, 81–96.
Smuts, A.
(2009) The paradox of suspense. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved Dec. 7, 2015, from [URL]
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F.
(1989) Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 241, 402–433.
Sternberg, M.
(1978) Expositional modes and temporal ordering in fiction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D.
(2005) Listening to action related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 171, 273–281.
Toolan, M.
(2001) Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
Tsai, P. S., Yu, B. H. Y., Lee, C. Y., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Wu, D. H.
(2009) An event-related potential study of the concreteness effect between Chinese nouns and verbs. Brain Research, 12531, 149–160.
van Peer, W.
(2007) Introduction to foregrounding: A state of the art. Language and Literature, 161, 99–104.
Vorderer, P.
(1996) Toward a psychological theory of suspense. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 233–254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vorderer, P., & Knobloch, S.
(2000) Conflict and suspense in drama. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 59–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vorderer, P., Wulff, H. J., & Friedrichsen, M.
(1996) Preface. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. vii–ix). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wang, J., Conder, J. A., Blitzer, D. N., & Shinkareva, S. V.
(2010) Neural representations of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta-analysis of imaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 311, 1459–1468.
Wulff, H. J.
(1996) Suspense and the influence of cataphora on viewers’ expectations. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 1–18). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Yanal, R. J.
(1996) The paradox of suspense. British Journal of Aesthetics, 361, 146–158.
Zillmann, D.
(1980) Anatomy of suspense. In P.H. Tannenbaum (Ed.), The entertainment functions of television (pp. 133–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1996) The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 199–231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J.R.
(1977) Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 81, 155–165.
Zillmann, D., Hay, A., & Bryant, J.
(1975) The effect of suspense and its resolution on the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Research in Personality, 91, 307–323.