Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 6:2 (2016) ► pp. 243277
Andringa, E.
(1995) Strategieën bij het lezen van literatuur. [Strategies in Reading Literary Fiction]. Spiegel. 13(3), 7–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bean, T. W. & Moni, K.
(2003) Developing Students’ Critical Literacy: Exploring Identify Construction in Young Adult Fiction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(8), 638–648. http://​www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/40017169Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E.
(1982) The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, E.
(2012) Author Representation in Literary Reading. [Doctoral dissertation]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Coninck, H.
(1975) Nog Een Geluk Dat [Still Fortunate That]. In: De Coninck, H. (Aut), Zolang er Sneeuw Ligt [As Long as There is Snow]. Belgium, Brugge: Orion.Google Scholar
Dewey, J.
(1910) How We Think. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath & Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C., & Leung, A.
(1993) Literary Processing and Interpretation: Towards Empirical Foundations. Poetics, 221, 5–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K. & Moldoveanu, M.C.
(2013) Opening the Closed Mind: The Effect of Exposure to Literature on the Need for Closure. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2). 149–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Earthman, E.A.
(1992) Creating the Virtual Work: Readers’ Processes in Understanding Literary Texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(4), 351–384.Google Scholar
Elder, L.
(2015) Amendment Needed for Critical Thinking in Education: On the Importance of Federal Congressional Support for the Advancement of Critical Thinking Throughout United States Education – Elementary Through Secondary and Beyond. Retrieved from: http://​www​.criticalthinking​.org​/data​/pages​/22​/b0d33a4bf74fb254bf4e7728b90e66cc559d7315c4dfa​.pdf]Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H.
(1993) Critical Thinking Assessment. Theory into Practice, 32 (3), 179–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. Retrieved from: http://​faculty​.education​.illinois​.edu​/rhennis​/documents​/TheNatureofCriticalThinking​_51711​_000​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ennis, R. H., Millman, J., & Tomko, T. N.
(2005) Cornell Critical Thinking Tests Level X & Level Z Manual: Fifth Edition. North Bend, OR: The Critical Thinking Co.Google Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T., Stanovich, K. E.
(2013) Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J.
(1954) The Psychology of Politics. New York, NJ: Praeger. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Facione, P.A.
(1990) Critical Thinking: A statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Milbrae (CA): The California Academic Press. Retrieved from: https://​assessment​.trinity​.duke​.edu​/documents​/Delphi​_Report​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Faust, M.
(2000) Reconstructing Familiar Metaphors: John Dewey and Louise Rosenblatt on Literary Art as Experience. Research in the Teaching of English, 35(1), 9–34.Google Scholar
Fialho, O.
(2007) Foregrounding and Refamiliarization: Understanding Readers’ Response to Literary Texts. Language and Literature, 16(2), 105–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fialho, O., Miall, D., & Zyngier, S.
(2011) Interpretation and Experience: Two Pedagogical Interventions Observed. English in Education, 45(3), 236–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, S.
(2005) Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R.
(1920) The Road Not Taken. In: R. Frost (Aut), Mountain Interval. New York, NJ: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Haft, S., Junger Witt, P., Thomas, T. (producers), & Weir, P. (director
) (1989) Dead Poets Society [Motion Picture]. USA: Touchstone Pictures.Google Scholar
Hakemulder, F.
(2000) The Moral Laboratory: Experiments Examining the Effects of Reading Literature on Social Perception and Moral Self-knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Foregrounding and Its Effect on Readers’ Perception. Discourse Processes, 38 (2), 193–2018. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F. & Van Peer, W.
(2015) Empirical Stylistics. In Sotirova, V. The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. F.
(1997) Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Brief Edition of Thought and Knowledge. Mahwah, NK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F.
(2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NJ: Guilford Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heijltjes, A.
(2013) Cultivating Critical Thinking: The Effects of Instructions on Economics Students’ Reasoning. [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from: http://​repub​.eur​.nl​/pub​/50418/Google Scholar
Hoorn, J.F.
(1997) Metaphor and the Brain: Behavioral and Psychophysiological Research into Literary Metaphor Processing. [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from: http://​dspace​.ubvu​.vu​.nl​/bitstream​/handle​/1871​/13048​/7392​.pdf​?sequence​=1​&isAllowed​=yGoogle Scholar
Hoorntje, R. & Doesborgh, D.
(2012, February 14). Het Nut van een Gebroken Hart [The Benefit of a Broken Heart]. NRC. Retrieved from: http://​www​.nrc​.nl​/next​/2012​/02​/14​/het​-nut​-van​-een​-gebroken​-hart​-12165689Google Scholar
Iser, W.
(1978) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M.
(2015) Neurocognitive Poetics: Methods and Models for Investigating the Neuronal and Cognitive-Affective Bases of Literature Reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(186). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, T.
(1998) Literatuuronderwijs bij Benadering: Een Empirisch Onderzoek naar de Vormgeving en Opbrengsten van het Literatuuronderwijs Nederlands in de Bovenbouw van het Havo en Vwo. [Approaches to Literature Education: An Empirical Research into the Design and Outputs of Dutch Literary Education in Upper Higher General and Pre-University Education]. [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from: http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/11245​/1​.143656Google Scholar
(2000) “Iets van Herkenning en Opluchting”. Een Onderzoek naar Leereffecten van Literatuuronderwijs. [“Some Kind of Recognition and Relief”. A Study into the Learning Outcomes of Literature Education.] In S. Stawski, et al. (Eds.), Docentengids Voortgezet Onderwijs [Teacher Guide Higher Education]. Houten: Bohn, Stafleu, Van Loghum.Google Scholar
Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G. & Van den Bergh, H.
(2012) Flexibility in Reading Literature: Differences Between Good and Poor Adolescent Readers. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(1), 83–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D.
(2011) Thinking Fast, and Slow. New York, NJ: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S.
(2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. In: Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. & Kahneman, D. (Eds). Heuristics of Intuitive Judgment: Extensions and Applications. New York, NJ: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D.C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science (New York, N.Y.), 3421, 377–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koek, M.
(2010) De Literaire Mindmap als Alternatief voor het Leesdossier. [The Literary Mindmap as an Alternative Literature Portfolio]. In: Vanhooren & Mottart (Red.), 24e Conferentie Het Schoolvak Nederlands [24th Conference on the School Subject Dutch] (pp. 60–64). Den Haag: Nederlandse Taalunie. Retrieved from: http://​taalunieversum​.org​/onderwijs​/conferentie​_het​_schoolvak​_nederlands​/bundels​/24​/60/Google Scholar
Koopman, E.M., & Hakemulder, F.
(2015) Effects of Literature on Empathy and Self-Reflection: A Theoretical-Empirical Framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lai, E.R.
(2011) Critical Thinking: A Literature Report. [Pearson’s Research Report]. Retrieved from Pearson Assessments Website: http://​images​.pearsonassessments​.com​/images​/tmrs​/CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL​.pdfGoogle Scholar
(1959/2002) Herfst. [Autumn]. In: Lucebert (Aut), Verzamelde Gedichten [Collected Poems] (pp 315). Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.Google Scholar
Martin, G. R. R.
(1996) A Game of Thrones. New York, NJ: Bantam Spectra.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. S.
(2015) Reading Beyond the Lines: A Critical Review of Cognitive Approaches to Literary Interpretation and Comprehension. Scientific Study of Literature, 5(1), 99–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D.
(1994) Foregrounding, Defamiliarization, and Affect Response to Literary Stories. Poetics, 22 (5), 389–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miall, D.S. & Kuiken, D.
(1995) Aspects of Literary Response: A New Questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 291, 37–58.Google Scholar
(2002) A Feeling for Fiction: Becoming What We Behold. Poetics, 30 (4), 221–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mol, S.E., & Bus, A.G.
(2011) Een Vroeg Begin is het Halve Werk. De Rol van Vrijetijdslezen in de Taal- en Leesontwikkeling van Kinderen en Jongeren. [An Early Start has Benefits. The Role of Leisure Reading in the Language and Reading Development of Children and Adolescents.] In D. Schram (Ed.), Waarom Zou je (nu) Lezen? [Why Would you Read (Now)?] (pp. 91–111). Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Murakovsky, J.
(1932/1964) Standard Language and Poetic Language. In: P.L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure and Style, 17–30. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Orr, D.
(2015) The Road Not Taken: Finding America in the Poem Everyone Loves and Almost Everyone Gets Wrong. New York, NJ: Penguin Random House LLC.Google Scholar
Purves, A.C., Beach, R.
(1972) Literature and the Reader: Research in Response to Literature, Reading Interests, and the Teaching of Literature. Urbana, ILL: National Council of Teachers of EnglishGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, L. M.
(1938/1995) Literature as Exploration. New York, NJ: The Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Salinger, J. D.
(1954) Uncle Wiggly in Connecticut. In: Salinger, J. D. (Aut), Nine Stories. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Schraw, G. & Bruning, R.
(1996) Readers’ Implicit Models of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 290–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O. & Rijlaarsdam, G.
(2016) The Impact of Literature Education on Students’ Perceptions of Self and Others: Exploring Personal and Social Learning Experiences in Relation to Teacher Approach. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature (accepted for publication). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shklovsky, V.
(1917/1998) Art as technique. In: Rivkin, J. & Ryan, M. (Ed.). Literary Theory: An Anthology. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing Ltd. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sopcak, P.
(2011) A Numerically Aided Phenomenological Study of Existential Reading. In: F. Hakemulder (Ed.), De Stralende Lezer: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Naar de Invloed van het Lezen [The Radiant Reader: Scientific Research into Effects of Reading]. Stichting Lezen Reeks 171, pp. 123–152.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E.
(2011) On the Distinction Between Rationality and Intelligence: Implications for Understanding Individual Differences in Reasoning. In: K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 343–365). New York, NJ: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. & Toplak, M. E.
(2012) Defining Features Versus Incidental Correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 Processing. Mind & Society, 11(1), 3–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trauzettel-Klosinski, S. & Dietz, K.
(2012) Standardized Assessment of Reading Performance: the New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 53(9), 5452–5461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F. jr., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M.
(2001) The Effects of Readers’ Goals on Inference Generation and Memory for Texts. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1081–1087. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Gelder, T.
(2005) Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons from Cognitive Science. College Teaching, 53(1), 41–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J. & Zyngier, S.
(2007) Lines on Feeling: Foregrounding, Aesthetics and Meaning. Language and Literature, 16 (2), 197–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verboord, M.
(2005) Long-term Effects of Literary Education on Book-reading Frequency: An Analysis of Dutch Student Cohorts 1975–1998. Poetics. 33(5–6), 320–342. Crossref.Google Scholar
Vipond, D. & Hunt, R. A.
(1984) Point-Driven Understanding: Pragmatic and Cognitive Dimensions of Literary Reading. Poetics, 13(3), 261–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W.
(1994) Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
West, R. F., Meserve, R. J., Stanovich, K. E.
(2012) Cognitive Sophistication does not Attenuate the Bias Blind Spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 506–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
West, R. F., Toplak, M. E & Stanovich, K. E.
(2008) Heuristics and Biases as Measures of Critical Thinking: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Thinking Dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 930–941. Crossref.Google Scholar
Whitman, W.
(1900) When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer. In: Whitman, W. (Aut), Leaves of Grass. Philadelphia: David McKay. Retrieved from: http://​www​.bartleby​.com​/142​/180​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Witte, T.
(2008) Het Oog van de Meester. Een Onderzoek naar de Literaire Ontwikkeling van Havo- en Vwo-leerlingen in de Tweede Fase van het Voortgezet Onderwijs. [The Eye of the Master. A Study of Literary Development of Upper Higher General Education and Pre-University Students.] [Doctoral Dissertation]. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Wolkers, J.
(1969) Turks Fruit [Turkish Delight]. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A.
(1994) Effect of Genre Expectations on Text Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933. Crossref.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Deane, Paul
2020. Building and Justifying Interpretations of Texts: A Key Practice in the English Language Arts. ETS Research Report Series 2020:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Hollis, Helena
2021. An investigation into the relationship between fiction and nonfiction reading exposure, and factors of critical thinking. Scientific Study of Literature 11:1  pp. 108 ff. Crossref logo
Luo, Meina, Susan Main, Graeme Lock, R. Malatesha Joshi & Chenyin Zhong
2020. Exploring Chinese EFL teachers' knowledge and beliefs relating to the teaching of English reading in public primary schools in China. Dyslexia 26:3  pp. 266 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.