Previous research suggests that literary reading may involve critical thinking. This involvement may facilitate critical literary understanding (CLU), i.e. understanding the literary text in a reconstructive, de-automatized manner. However, little is known about the cognitive processes this involvement entails. This study aims: (1) to conceptualize CLU, by relating dual process theory to concepts from the domain of literary studies (foregrounding, defamiliarization); (2) to test CLU in an educational context. An instrument to measure CLU was designed. A prospective cohort study was conducted (N = 271, grades 10–12, pre-university education, ages 14–19) at a Dutch secondary school. CLU, critical thinking skills (CTS) and dispositions (CTD) were measured one month after the start of the academic year, CLU was measured again four months later. Results show that students improve in CLU. This improvement is mediated by CTD and moderated by CTS. These results suggest that critical thinking can be engaged in the literature classroom.
Bean, T. W. & Moni, K. (2003). Developing Students’ Critical Literacy: Exploring Identify Construction in Young Adult Fiction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(8), 638–648. [URL]
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131.
De Coninck, H. (1975). Nog Een Geluk Dat [Still Fortunate That]. In: De Coninck, H. (Aut), Zolang er Sneeuw Ligt [As Long as There is Snow]. Belgium, Brugge: Orion.
Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath & Company.
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C., & Leung, A. (1993). Literary Processing and Interpretation: Towards Empirical Foundations. Poetics, 221, 5–33.
Djikic, M., Oatley, K. & Moldoveanu, M.C. (2013) Opening the Closed Mind: The Effect of Exposure to Literature on the Need for Closure. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2). 149–154.
Earthman, E.A. (1992). Creating the Virtual Work: Readers’ Processes in Understanding Literary Texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(4), 351–384.
Elder, L. (2015). Amendment Needed for Critical Thinking in Education: On the Importance of Federal Congressional Support for the Advancement of Critical Thinking Throughout United States Education – Elementary Through Secondary and Beyond. Retrieved from: [URL]]
Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical Thinking Assessment. Theory into Practice, 32 (3), 179–186.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. Retrieved from: [URL]
Ennis, R. H., Millman, J., & Tomko, T. N. (2005). Cornell Critical Thinking Tests Level X & Level Z Manual: Fifth Edition. North Bend, OR: The Critical Thinking Co.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241.
Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The Psychology of Politics. New York, NJ: Praeger.
Facione, P.A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Milbrae (CA): The California Academic Press. Retrieved from: [URL]
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What it is and Why it Counts. Retrieved from: [URL]
Faust, M. (2000). Reconstructing Familiar Metaphors: John Dewey and Louise Rosenblatt on Literary Art as Experience. Research in the Teaching of English, 35(1), 9–34.
Fialho, O. (2007). Foregrounding and Refamiliarization: Understanding Readers’ Response to Literary Texts. Language and Literature, 16(2), 105–123.
Fialho, O., Miall, D., & Zyngier, S. (2011). Interpretation and Experience: Two Pedagogical Interventions Observed. English in Education, 45(3), 236–253.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.
Frost, R. (1920). The Road Not Taken. In: R. Frost (Aut), Mountain Interval. New York, NJ: Henry Holt and Company.
Haft, S., Junger Witt, P., Thomas, T. (producers), & Weir, P. (director). (1989) Dead Poets Society [Motion Picture]. USA: Touchstone Pictures.
Hakemulder, F. (2004). Foregrounding and Its Effect on Readers’ Perception. Discourse Processes, 38 (2), 193–2018.
Hakemulder, F. & Van Peer, W. (2015). Empirical Stylistics. In Sotirova, V.The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Halpern, D. F. (1997). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Brief Edition of Thought and Knowledge. Mahwah, NK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NJ: Guilford Press.
Heijltjes, A. (2013). Cultivating Critical Thinking: The Effects of Instructions on Economics Students’ Reasoning. [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from: [URL]
Hoorn, J.F. (1997). Metaphor and the Brain: Behavioral and Psychophysiological Research into Literary Metaphor Processing. [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from: [URL]
Hoorntje, R. & Doesborgh, D. (2012, February14). Het Nut van een Gebroken Hart [The Benefit of a Broken Heart]. NRC. Retrieved from: [URL]
Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Neurocognitive Poetics: Methods and Models for Investigating the Neuronal and Cognitive-Affective Bases of Literature Reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(186).
Janssen, T. (1998). Literatuuronderwijs bij Benadering: Een Empirisch Onderzoek naar de Vormgeving en Opbrengsten van het Literatuuronderwijs Nederlands in de Bovenbouw van het Havo en Vwo. [Approaches to Literature Education: An Empirical Research into the Design and Outputs of Dutch Literary Education in Upper Higher General and Pre-University Education]. [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from: [URL]
Janssen, T. (2000). “Iets van Herkenning en Opluchting”. Een Onderzoek naar Leereffecten van Literatuuronderwijs. [“Some Kind of Recognition and Relief”. A Study into the Learning Outcomes of Literature Education.] In S. Stawski, et al. (Eds.), Docentengids Voortgezet Onderwijs [Teacher Guide Higher Education]. Houten: Bohn, Stafleu, Van Loghum.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast, and Slow. New York, NJ: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. In: Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. & Kahneman, D. (Eds). Heuristics of Intuitive Judgment: Extensions and Applications. New York, NJ: Cambridge University Press.
Kidd, D.C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science (New York, N.Y.), 3421, 377–380.
Koek, M. (2010). De Literaire Mindmap als Alternatief voor het Leesdossier. [The Literary Mindmap as an Alternative Literature Portfolio]. In: Vanhooren & Mottart (Red.), 24e Conferentie Het Schoolvak Nederlands [24th Conference on the School Subject Dutch] (pp. 60–64). Den Haag: Nederlandse Taalunie. Retrieved from: [URL]
Koopman, E.M., & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of Literature on Empathy and Self-Reflection: A Theoretical-Empirical Framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79–111.
Lai, E.R. (2011). Critical Thinking: A Literature Report. [Pearson’s Research Report]. Retrieved from Pearson Assessments Website: [URL]
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, Defamiliarization, and Affect Response to Literary Stories. Poetics, 22 (5), 389–407.
Miall, D.S. & Kuiken, D. (1995). Aspects of Literary Response: A New Questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 291, 37–58.
Miall, D.S. & Kuiken, D. (2002). A Feeling for Fiction: Becoming What We Behold. Poetics, 30 (4), 221–241.
Mol, S.E., & Bus, A.G. (2011) Een Vroeg Begin is het Halve Werk. De Rol van Vrijetijdslezen in de Taal- en Leesontwikkeling van Kinderen en Jongeren. [An Early Start has Benefits. The Role of Leisure Reading in the Language and Reading Development of Children and Adolescents.] In D. Schram (Ed.), Waarom Zou je (nu) Lezen? [Why Would you Read (Now)?] (pp. 91–111). Delft: Eburon.
Murakovsky, J. (1932/1964). Standard Language and Poetic Language. In: P.L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure and Style, 17–30. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Orr, D. (2015). The Road Not Taken: Finding America in the Poem Everyone Loves and Almost Everyone Gets Wrong. New York, NJ: Penguin Random House LLC.
Purves, A.C., Beach, R. (1972). Literature and the Reader: Research in Response to Literature, Reading Interests, and the Teaching of Literature. Urbana, ILL: National Council of Teachers of English
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1938/1995). Literature as Exploration. New York, NJ: The Modern Language Association of America.
Salinger, J. D. (1954). Uncle Wiggly in Connecticut. In: Salinger, J. D. (Aut), Nine Stories. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Schraw, G. & Bruning, R. (1996). Readers’ Implicit Models of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 290–305.
Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2016). The Impact of Literature Education on Students’ Perceptions of Self and Others: Exploring Personal and Social Learning Experiences in Relation to Teacher Approach. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature (accepted for publication).
Shklovsky, V. (1917/1998). Art as technique. In: Rivkin, J. & Ryan, M. (Ed.). Literary Theory: An Anthology. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Sopcak, P. (2011). A Numerically Aided Phenomenological Study of Existential Reading. In: F. Hakemulder (Ed.), De Stralende Lezer: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Naar de Invloed van het Lezen [The Radiant Reader: Scientific Research into Effects of Reading]. Stichting Lezen Reeks 171, pp. 123–152.
Stanovich, K. E. (2011). On the Distinction Between Rationality and Intelligence: Implications for Understanding Individual Differences in Reasoning. In: K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 343–365). New York, NJ: Oxford University Press.
Stanovich, K. E. & Toplak, M. E. (2012). Defining Features Versus Incidental Correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 Processing. Mind & Society, 11(1), 3–13.
Trauzettel-Klosinski, S. & Dietz, K. (2012). Standardized Assessment of Reading Performance: the New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 53(9), 5452–5461.
Van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F. jr., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The Effects of Readers’ Goals on Inference Generation and Memory for Texts. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1081–1087.
Van Gelder, T. (2005). Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons from Cognitive Science. College Teaching, 53(1), 41–48.
Van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J. & Zyngier, S. (2007). Lines on Feeling: Foregrounding, Aesthetics and Meaning. Language and Literature, 16 (2), 197–213.
Verboord, M. (2005). Long-term Effects of Literary Education on Book-reading Frequency: An Analysis of Dutch Student Cohorts 1975–1998. Poetics. 33(5–6), 320–342. .
Vipond, D. & Hunt, R. A. (1984). Point-Driven Understanding: Pragmatic and Cognitive Dimensions of Literary Reading. Poetics, 13(3), 261–277.
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062.
West, R. F., Meserve, R. J., Stanovich, K. E. (2012). Cognitive Sophistication does not Attenuate the Bias Blind Spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 506–519.
West, R. F., Toplak, M. E & Stanovich, K. E. (2008). Heuristics and Biases as Measures of Critical Thinking: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Thinking Dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 930–941. .
Whitman, W. (1900). When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer. In: Whitman, W. (Aut), Leaves of Grass. Philadelphia: David McKay. Retrieved from: [URL]
Witte, T. (2008). Het Oog van de Meester. Een Onderzoek naar de Literaire Ontwikkeling van Havo- en Vwo-leerlingen in de Tweede Fase van het Voortgezet Onderwijs. [The Eye of the Master. A Study of Literary Development of Upper Higher General Education and Pre-University Students.] [Doctoral Dissertation]. Delft: Eburon.
Wolkers, J. (1969). Turks Fruit [Turkish Delight]. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.
Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of Genre Expectations on Text Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933. .
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Willems, Roel M.
2023. MA-EM: A neurocognitive model for understanding mixed and ambiguous emotions and morality. Cognitive Neuroscience 14:2 ► pp. 51 ff.
2020. Building and Justifying Interpretations of Texts: A Key Practice in the English Language Arts. ETS Research Report Series 2020:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Luo, Meina, Susan Main, Graeme Lock, R. Malatesha Joshi & Chenyin Zhong
2020. Exploring Chinese EFL teachers' knowledge and beliefs relating to the teaching of English reading in public primary schools in China. Dyslexia 26:3 ► pp. 266 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.