Previous work (Whalen, Zunshine, & Holquist, 2012) has shown that perspective embedding ("she thought I left" embedding her perspective on "I left") affects reading times for short vignettes. With increasing levels of embedment 1–5, reading times rose almost linearly. Level 0 was as slow as 3–4. Embedment level was determined by the authors, but validation by others is desirable. In Experiment 1, we trained 12 literature students to make embedment judgments. Their judgments correlated highly with ours (.94 on average) and agreed exactly in the majority of cases (74.5%); almost all were within one (94.2%). In Experiment 2, judgments of the first three paragraphs of "To Kill a Mockingbird" (Lee, 1960) yielded a lower level of agreement; literature uses subtle means for introducing perspective embedment, and individuals differ about including them. Assessment of perspective embedding, and exploration of sources of disagreements, provide new tools for analyzing literature.
(2015) Empirical stylisticsThe Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Hirschfeld, L. A.
(2013) The myth of mentalizing and the primacy of folk sociology. In M. Banaji & S. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 101–106). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hogan, P. C.
(2003) The mind and its stories: Narrative universals and human emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D.
(1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1111, 228–238.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves Theory of Mind. Science, 3421, 377–380.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G.
(1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Lee, H.
(1960) To kill a mockingbird. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott and Co.
Miall, D. S.
(2006) Literary reading: Empirical and theoretical studies. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D.
(2001) Shifting perspectives: Readers’ feelings and literary response. In W. van Peer & S. Chatman (Eds.), New perspectives on narrative perspective (pp. 289–301). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Oatley, K.
(2012) The passionate muse: Exploring emotion in stories. New York: Oxford University Press.
Palmer, A.
(2010) Social minds in the novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Rabinowitz, P. J.
(1987) Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. The theory and interpretation of narrative series. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Rabinowitz, P. J., & Bancroft, C.
(2014) Euclid at the core: Recentering literary education. Style, 48(1), 1–34.
Schneider, R.
(2001) Toward a cognitive theory of literary character: The dynamics of mental-model construction. Style, 351, 607–639.
Schneider, R.
(2013) The cognitive theory of character reception: An updated proposal. Anglistik, 24(2), 117–134.
Scholes, R., Phelan, J., & Kellogg, R.
(2006) The nature of narrative (Revised and expanded, 40th anniversary edition ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(2002) Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind and Language, 171, 3–23.
van Duijn, M. J., Sluiter, I., & Verhagen, A.
(2015) When narrative takes over: The representation of embedded mindstates in Shakespeare’s Othello. Language and Literature, 24(2), 148–166.
van Peer, W., Hakemulder, F., & Zyngier, S.
(2007) Lines on feeling: foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning. Language and Literature, 16(2), 197–213.
(2015) Perspective embedding affects reading time: Implications for the reading of literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1778), 1–9.
Zunshine, L.
(2006) Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Zunshine, L.
(2011) Style brings in mental states. Style, 451, 349–356.
Zunshine, L.
(2014) Theory of Mind as a pedagogical tool. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, 161, 89–109.
Zunshine, L.
(2015a) From the social to the literary: Approaching Cao Xueqin’s The Story of the Stone (紅樓夢) from a cognitive perspective. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive literary studies (pp. 176–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zunshine, L.
(2015b) The secret life of fiction. PMLA, 1301, 724–731.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Carpenter, Jordan M., Melanie C. Green & Kaitlin Fitzgerald
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.