Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 6:2 (2016) ► pp. 298313
Albers, S.
(2008) Lautsymbolik in ägyptischen Texten. Mainz: Philipp Von Zabern Verlag.Google Scholar
([ca. 335 BC] 2005) Poetics. Newburyport, MA: Focus.Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M.
(2013) Extracting Salient Sublexical Units from Written Texts:“EMOPHON”, a Corpus-Based Approach to Phonological Iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology, 41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Ullrich, S., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M.
(2016) Measuring the basic affective tone of poems via phonological saliency and iconicity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 191–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auracher, J., Albers, S., Zhai, Y., Gareeva, G., & Stavniychuk, T.
(2010) P is for Happiness, N is for Sadness: Universals in Sound Iconicity to Detect Emotions in Poetry. Discourse Processes, 481, 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory & Language, 59(4), 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A.
(2012) Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A.
(1976) Phoneme-monitoring reaction time as a function of preceding intonation contour. Perception & Psychophysics, 20(1), 55–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. R.
(1994) Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.Google Scholar
Demmerling, C., & Landweer, H.
(2007) Philosophie der Gefühle: Von Achtung bis Zorn. Stuttgart: Metzler. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfels, C. v.
(1937) On Gestalt-qualities. Psychological Review, 44(6), 521–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P.
(1992) An Argument for Basic Emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200. Crossref.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I.
(1961) Communication in poetry. Word, 17(2), 194–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genette, G.
(1976/1995) Mimologics: Voyage en Cratylie. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D.
(1996) Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgements. Poetics, 23(5), 363–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huron, D. B.
(2006) Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation: MIT press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., Lüdtke, J., & Meyer-Sickendiek, B.
(2013) Bausteine einer Neurokognitiven Poetik: Foregrounding/Backgrounding, lyrische Stimmung und ästhetisches Gefallen. Elements of a neurocognitive poetics: Foregrounding/backgrounding, typical mood, and aesthetic pleasure) in Stimmung und Methode (Mood and Method), ed. B. Meyer-Sickendiek and F. Reents (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 63–94.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M.
(2015) Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. Towards a cognitive neuroscience of natural language use, 135–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R.
(1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. Style in language, 3501, 377.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., & Waugh, L.
(1979) The sound shape of language. London: Bloomington.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1933) Linguistica : selected papers in English, French and German. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kraxenberger, M., & Menninghaus, W.
(2016) Mimological Reveries? Disconfirming the Hypothesis of Phono-Emotional Iconicity in Poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, H.
(2008) Handbuch der Rhetorik: Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Lea, R. B., Rapp, D. N., Elfenbein, A., Mitchel, A. D., & Romine, R. S.
(2008) Sweet Silent Thought Alliteration and Resonance in Poetry Comprehension. Psychological Science, 19(7), 709–716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M., & Prince, A.
(1977) On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic inquiry, 8(2), 249–336.Google Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., & Jacobs, A. M.
(2014) Sounds funny? Humor effects of phonological and prosodic figures of speech. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Knoop, C. A.
2017). The emotional and aesthetic powers of parallelistic diction. Poetics (advanced online publication). Crossref
Meyer, L. B.
(1961) Emotion and Meaning in Music. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Obermeier, C., Menninghaus, W., von Koppenfels, M., Raettig, T., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Otterbein, S., & Kotz, S.A.
(2013) Aesthetic and emotional effects of meter and rhyme in poetry. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Obermeier, C., Kotz, S. A., Jessen, S., Raettig, T., von Koppenfels, M., & Menninghaus, W.
(2016) Aesthetic appreciation of poetry correlates with ease of processing in event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(2), 362–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G.
(1990) The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1953) The Instituto oratoria of Quintilian. (H. E. Butler, Ed. and trans.) London: W. Heinemann/Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reichel, U. D.
(2012) PermA and Balloon: Tools for String Alignment and Text Processing. In: Proceedings of Interspeech, Portland, OR, paper 346.Google Scholar
Reichel, U. D., & Kisler, T.
(2014) Language-Independent Grapheme-Phoneme Conversion and Word Stress Assignment as a Web Service. In: R. Hoffmann (Ed.), Elektronische Sprachverarbeitung: Studientexte zur Sprachkommunikation 711, pp. 42–49. Dresden: TUDpress.Google Scholar
Russell, J.A.
(1980) A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, H.
(1969) System der Philosophie: Der Gefühlsraum. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A.
(2011) Gehirn und Gedicht. Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. München: Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
Selkirk L.
(1984) Phonology and Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Shields, J. L., McHugh, A., & Martin, J. G.
(1974) Reaction time to phoneme targets as a function of rhythmic cues in continuous speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(2), 250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsur, R.
(1992) What makes sound patterns expressive? The poetic mode of speech perception. Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valery, P.
(1958) Remarks on Poetry. The Art of Poetry (trans. Denise Folliot).Google Scholar
Van Peer, W.
(1986) Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
(1990) The measurement of metre: Its cognitive and affective functions. Poetics, 19(3), 259–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whissell, C.
(2002) Emotion conveyed by sound in the poetry of Alfred, Lord Tennyson. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20(2), 137–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) To those who feel rather than to those who think: Sound and emotion in Poe’s poetry. International Journal of English and Literature, 2(6), 149–156.Google Scholar
Wiese, R.
(1996) The Phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, M., & Van Peer, W.
(2003) Roman Jakobsons Konzept der Selbstreferenz aus der Perspektive der heutigen Kognitionswissenschaft. In: H. Birus, S. Donat, & B. Meyer-Sickendiek (Eds.), Roman Jakobsons Gedichtanalysen, pp. 277–306. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Blohm, Stefan, Winfried Menninghaus & Matthias Schlesewsky
2017. Sentence-Level Effects of Literary Genre: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Blohm, Stefan, Valentin Wagner, Matthias Schlesewsky & Winfried Menninghaus
2018. Sentence judgments and the grammar of poetry: Linking linguistic structure and poetic effect. Poetics 69  pp. 41 ff. Crossref logo
Bruhn, Mark J.
2018. Citation analysis. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2018. (Neuro-)Cognitive poetics and computational stylistics. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo
Nikolsky, Aleksey
2020.  In The Origins of Language Revisited,  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Postarnak, Svetlana, São Luís Castro & Susana Silva
2020. The role of linguistic prosody in the responses to recited poetry. Scientific Study of Literature 10:2  pp. 228 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.