Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 6:2 (2016) ► pp.298–313

Emotional effects of poetic phonology, word positioning and dominant stress peaks in poetry reading

| Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics
| Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics
This study tested the hypothesis that features of linguistically non-mandatory phonological recurrence (rhyme, alliteration, assonance, and consonance), parameters of word positioning (position within a line and line position) and dominant stress peaks are related to readers’ identification of distinctively joyful and sad words in poetry. To this end, forty-eight participants read eight German poems, completed an underlining task, and filled out a brief questionnaire. Results show that these target features are clearly of importance for readers’ perception of pronounced levels of joy and sadness. Words featuring alliteration, assonance or consonance were significantly more often underlined as distinctively joyful than were words that lack these features. Our study shows also that words that feature a dominant stress peak and are placed in more advanced positions within the poems were more likely to be identified as emotional (distinctively joyful and sad) when compared to words in earlier and unstressed positions.
Keywords: poetry, joy, sadness, dominant stress peaks, underlining task, poetic phonology, word position
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Material and methods
    • Selected stimuli
    • Participants
    • Questionnaire and underlining task
    • Text analyses
    • Statistical analyses
  • Results
  • Discussion and outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.2.06kra
References (47)
References
Albers, S. (2008). Lautsymbolik in ägyptischen Texten. Mainz: Philipp Von Zabern Verlag.Google Scholar
Aristotle ([ca. 335 BC] 2005). Poetics. Newburyport, MA: Focus.Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2013). Extracting Salient Sublexical Units from Written Texts:“EMOPHON”, a Corpus-Based Approach to Phonological Iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology, 41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Ullrich, S., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2016). Measuring the basic affective tone of poems via phonological saliency and iconicity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 191–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auracher, J., Albers, S., Zhai, Y., Gareeva, G., & Stavniychuk, T. (2010). P is for Happiness, N is for Sadness: Universals in Sound Iconicity to Detect Emotions in Poetry. Discourse Processes, 481, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory & Language, 59(4), 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (1976). Phoneme-monitoring reaction time as a function of preceding intonation contour. Perception & Psychophysics, 20(1), 55–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1994) Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.Google Scholar
Demmerling, C., & Landweer, H. (2007). Philosophie der Gefühle: Von Achtung bis Zorn. Stuttgart: Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfels, C. v. (1937). On Gestalt-qualities. Psychological Review, 44(6), 521–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. (1992). An Argument for Basic Emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1961). Communication in poetry. Word, 17(2), 194–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. (1976/1995). Mimologics: Voyage en Cratylie. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. (1996). Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgements. Poetics, 23(5), 363–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation: MIT press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., Lüdtke, J., & Meyer-Sickendiek, B. (2013). Bausteine einer Neurokognitiven Poetik: Foregrounding/Backgrounding, lyrische Stimmung und ästhetisches Gefallen. Elements of a neurocognitive poetics: Foregrounding/backgrounding, typical mood, and aesthetic pleasure) in Stimmung und Methode (Mood and Method), ed. B. Meyer-Sickendiek and F. Reents (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 63–94.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. Towards a cognitive neuroscience of natural language use, 135–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. Style in language, 3501, 377.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., & Waugh, L. (1979). The sound shape of language. London: Bloomington.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1933) Linguistica : selected papers in English, French and German. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kraxenberger, M., & Menninghaus, W. (2016). Mimological Reveries? Disconfirming the Hypothesis of Phono-Emotional Iconicity in Poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, H. (2008) Handbuch der Rhetorik: Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Lea, R. B., Rapp, D. N., Elfenbein, A., Mitchel, A. D., & Romine, R. S. (2008). Sweet Silent Thought Alliteration and Resonance in Poetry Comprehension. Psychological Science, 19(7), 709–716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M., & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic inquiry, 8(2), 249–336.Google Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Sounds funny? Humor effects of phonological and prosodic figures of speech. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Knoop, C. A. (2017). The emotional and aesthetic powers of parallelistic diction. Poetics (advanced online publication). DOI logo
Meyer, L. B. (1961). Emotion and Meaning in Music. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obermeier, C., Menninghaus, W., von Koppenfels, M., Raettig, T., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Otterbein, S., & Kotz, S.A. (2013). Aesthetic and emotional effects of meter and rhyme in poetry. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obermeier, C., Kotz, S. A., Jessen, S., Raettig, T., von Koppenfels, M., & Menninghaus, W. (2016). Aesthetic appreciation of poetry correlates with ease of processing in event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(2), 362–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1990). The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quintilian (1953). The Instituto oratoria of Quintilian. (H. E. Butler, Ed. and trans.) London: W. Heinemann/Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reichel, U. D. (2012). PermA and Balloon: Tools for String Alignment and Text Processing. In: Proceedings of Interspeech, Portland, OR, paper 346.Google Scholar
Reichel, U. D., & Kisler, T. (2014). Language-Independent Grapheme-Phoneme Conversion and Word Stress Assignment as a Web Service. In: R. Hoffmann (Ed.), Elektronische Sprachverarbeitung: Studientexte zur Sprachkommunikation 711, pp. 42–49. Dresden: TUDpress.Google Scholar
Russell, J.A. (1980). A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, H. (1969). System der Philosophie: Der Gefühlsraum. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht. Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. München: Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
Selkirk L. (1984). Phonology and Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Shields, J. L., McHugh, A., & Martin, J. G. (1974). Reaction time to phoneme targets as a function of rhythmic cues in continuous speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(2), 250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsur, R. (1992). What makes sound patterns expressive? The poetic mode of speech perception. Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valery, P. (1958). Remarks on Poetry. The Art of Poetry (trans. Denise Folliot).Google Scholar
Van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
(1990). The measurement of metre: Its cognitive and affective functions. Poetics, 19(3), 259–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whissell, C. (2002). Emotion conveyed by sound in the poetry of Alfred, Lord Tennyson. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20(2), 137–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). To those who feel rather than to those who think: Sound and emotion in Poe’s poetry. International Journal of English and Literature, 2(6), 149–156.Google Scholar
Wiese, R. (1996). The Phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, M., & Van Peer, W. (2003). Roman Jakobsons Konzept der Selbstreferenz aus der Perspektive der heutigen Kognitionswissenschaft. In: H. Birus, S. Donat, & B. Meyer-Sickendiek (Eds.), Roman Jakobsons Gedichtanalysen, pp. 277–306. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Crone, J. H.
2023. Free Verse and Prose Rhythm. Poetics Today 44:3 ► pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
Richter, Sandra, Toni Bernhart, Felix Dieterle, Gabriel Viehhauser, Gunilla Eschenbach, Jonas Kuhn, Nadja Schauffler, André Blessing, Markus Gärtner, Kerstin Jung, Nora Ketschig, Anna Kinder, Julia Koch, Thang Vu & Andreas Kozlik
2023. Der Klang der Lyrik. Poema: Jahrbuch für Lyrikforschung / Annual for the Study of Lyric Poetry / La recherche annuelle en poésie lyrique :1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Nikolsky, Aleksey
2020. “Talking Jew’s Harp” and Its Relation to Vowel Harmony as a Paradigm of Formative Influence of Music on Language. In The Origins of Language Revisited, ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Postarnak, Svetlana, São Luís Castro & Susana Silva
2020. The role of linguistic prosody in the responses to recited poetry. Scientific Study of Literature 10:2 ► pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Blohm, Stefan, Valentin Wagner, Matthias Schlesewsky & Winfried Menninghaus
2018. Sentence judgments and the grammar of poetry: Linking linguistic structure and poetic effect. Poetics 69 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Bruhn, Mark J.
2018. Citation analysis. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2018. (Neuro-)Cognitive poetics and computational stylistics. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Blohm, Stefan, Winfried Menninghaus & Matthias Schlesewsky
2017. Sentence-Level Effects of Literary Genre: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. A Life with Poetry [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 41], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.