Cover not available
Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 7:1 (2017) ► pp.52–78

Perceptual qualities of literary style

| Institut für Germanistik und Kommunikation | University of Technology Chemnitz

This article reports the results of a study that investigated different aspects of the aesthetic perception of literary style. Excerpts from novels belonging to two broadly defined literary style categories, namely modern and postmodern style, were judged by the participants. Semantic scales corresponding to perceptual qualities of modern and postmodern literature were used. The results indicate that these scales can measure perceptual differences between the selected novels, and that the two novels categorized as modern were experienced differently from those categorized as postmodern. Some of the scales also predicted aesthetic preference for novels. Rating differences on the two scales incoherent – coherent and formal – colloquial predicted the ability to attribute novel excerpts. This finding seems to indicate that the ability to distinguish styles in regard to perceptual qualities helps readers to judge certain similarities of novels.

Keywords: style, novel, perceptual qualities, modern literature, postmodern literature, aesthetic preference, attribution, style categorization
Article outline
  • Research on literary style
    • The perceptual dimension of literary style
  • Theory and methods
    • Measuring perceptual qualities with semantic scales
    • Hypotheses and predictions
  • The study
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Study design and procedure
    • Results
      • Semantic scales and perceptual qualities of style
      • Relations between semantic scales and aesthetic preference
      • Attribution of excerpts to novels
    • General discussion
    • Limitations and further work
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 23 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.03sie
References
Auer, P.
(1989) Natürlichkeit und Stil. In V. Hinnenkamp & M. Selting (Eds.), Stil und Stilisierung: Arbeiten zur interpretativen Soziolinguistik (pp. 27–59). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N.
(2011) The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods 43(3), 800–813. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bubenhofer, N., & Scharloth, J.
(2012) Stil als Kategorie der soziopragmatischen Sprachgeschichte. In P. Maitz (Ed.), Historische Sprachwissenschaft: Erkenntnisinteressen, Grundlagenprobleme, Desiderate (pp. 227–261). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D.
(2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1), 3–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, D.
(1995) Microserfs. New York: ReganBooks.Google Scholar
Croce, B.
(1937) La poesia. Introduzione alla critica e storia della poesia e della letteratura. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Cupchik, B. C., Leonard, G., Axelrad, E., & Kalin, J. D.
(1998) The landscape of emotion in literary encounters. Cognition and Emotion, 12(6), 825–847. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damiani, A., Jeric, D., Imberty, M., & Belardinelli, M. O.
(2004) Evaluation of the musical style using the semantic differential technique and a fuzzy graphic rating scale. In S. D. Libscomb, R. Ashley, R. O. Gjerdingen, & P. Webster (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception & Cognition (pp. 410–412). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University School of Music.Google Scholar
Devoto, G.
(1950) Studi di stilistica. Firenze: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N.
(2009) Stil und Sozialität (Gruppe, Alter, Geschlecht). In U. Fix, A. Gardt, & J. Knape (2008–2009), Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung, Vol. 21 (pp. 1245–1270), Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Doležel, L., & Bailey, R. W.
(Eds.) (1969) Statistics and style. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. E.
(1991) American Psycho. London: Picador.Google Scholar
Fix, U., Wellmann, H.
(Eds.) (1997) Stile, Stilprägungen, Stilgeschichte: Über Epochen-, Gattungs- und Autorenstile, sprachliche Analysen und didaktische Aspekte. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Fix, U., Gardt, A., & Knape, J.
(Eds.) (2008–2009) Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung (Vols. 1–2). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, K.
(2006) Literary theory and stylistics. In E. K. Brown, R. E. Asher, & J. M. Y. Simpson, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.), Vol. 71 (pp. 261–267). New York: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hebdige, D.
(1979) Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Habscheid, S.
(Ed.) (2003) Gruppenstile: Zur sprachlichen Inszenierung sozialer Zugehörigkeit. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Hemingway, E.
(1994) A farewell to arms. London: Arrow. (Original work published 1929)Google Scholar
Hoover, D. L.
(2002) Frequent word sequences and statistical stylistics. Literary & Linguistic Computing, 17(2), 157–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huxley, A.
(1955) After many a summer. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Original work published 1939)Google Scholar
Jeffries, L. & McIntyre, D.
(2010) Stylistics. Cambridge GB: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, C.
(1999, August 5). Das Monster ist ein Moralist. Zeit online. [URL]
Kaiser, H.
(1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 391, 31–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knoop, C. A., Wagner, V., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W.
(2016) Mapping the aesthetic space of literature “from below”. Poetics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kraus, J.
(1987) On the sociolinguistic aspects of the notion of functional style . In J. Chloupek & J. Nekvapil (Eds.), Reader in Czech Sociolinguistics (pp. 83–93). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowe, D., & Matthews, R.
(1995) A stylometric analysis by radial basis functions. Computers and the Humanities, 291, 449–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayr, S., & Buchner, A.
(2007) Negative priming as a memory phenomenon: A review of 20 years of negative priming research. Journal of Psychology, 215(1), 35–51.Google Scholar
Michel, G.
(2001) Stilistische Textanalyse. Eine Einführung. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.Google Scholar
Müller, W. G.
(2009) Epochenstil/Zeitstil. In U. Fix, A. Gardt, & J. Knape (2008–2009), Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung, Vol. 21 (pp. 1271–1285), Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Neme, A., Pulido, J. R. G., Muñoz, A., Hernández, S., & Dey, T.
(2015) Stylistics analysis and authorship attribution algorithms based on self-organizing maps. Neurocomputing, 1471, 147–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nöth, W.
(2009) Stil als Zeichen. In U. Fix, A. Gardt, & J. Knape (2008–2009), Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung, Vol. 21 (pp. 1178–1196), Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H.
(1957), The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G.
(2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 51, 411–419.Google Scholar
Reich-Ranicki, M.
(2008, December 8). Was denken Sie von Hemingway? FAZ online. [URL]
Riffaterre, M.
(1973) Strukturale Stilistik. München: List.Google Scholar
Salimpoor, V. N.
(2003) The effect of odor-manipulated context on hedonic evaluations and experience of literature. Journal of Young Investigators 11. [URL]
Sandig, B.
(2006) Textstilistik des Deutschen (2nd ed.). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scharloth, J. & Bubenhofer, N.
(2012) Datengeleitete Korpuspragmatik: Korpusvergleich als Methode der Stilanalyse. In E. Felder, M. Müller, & F. Vogel (Eds.), Korpuspragmatik. Thematische Korpora als Basis diskurslinguistischer Analysen (pp. 195–230). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sedelow, S. Y., & Sedelow, W. A.
(1972) Models, computing, and stylistics. In B. B. Kachru & H. F. Stahlke (Eds.), Current trends in stylistics (pp. 275–286). Edmonton: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Semino, E., & Culpeper, J.
(Eds.) (2002) Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siefkes, M.
(2011) Style: A new semiotic view on an old problem. Kodikas/Code. Ars Semeiotica 34, 1/2, 15–25.Google Scholar
(2012) Stil als Zeichenprozess: Wie Variation bei Verhalten, Artefakten und Texten Information erzeugt. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
(2013) The experimental aesthetics of style. Research report, IUAV Venice. [URL]
Siefkes, M., & Arielli, E.
(2015) An experimental approach to multimodality: How musical and architectural styles interact in aesthetic perception. In J. Wildfeuer (Ed.), Building bridges for multimodal research. International perspectives on theories and practices of multimodal analysis (pp. 247–265). Bern & New York: Lang.Google Scholar
Simpson, P.
(2014) Stylistics: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Snider, J. G., & Osgood, C. E.
(1969) Semantic differential technique. A sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Spillner, B.
(1995) Stilsemiotik. In G. Stickel (Ed.), Stilfragen (pp. 62–93). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L.
(1948) Linguistics and literary history: Essays in stylistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, L. L.
(2006) Computational stylistics. In E. K. Brown, R. E. Asher, & J. M. Y. Simpson, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.), Vol. 21 (pp. 769–775). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, F.
(1972) The style of innocence. A study of Hemingway and Callaghan. Toronto: Clarke & Irwin.Google Scholar
Thomaneck, J.
(1969) Ernest Hemingway. Adverb und Adjektiv als Stil- und Deutungsmittel. PhD thesis, University of Kiel.Google Scholar
Tuldava, J.
(2005) Stylistics, author identification. In R. Köhler, G. Altmann, & R. G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative Linguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch (pp. 368–387). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A.
(1982) Priming effects in word fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 8(4), 336–342.Google Scholar
Verdonk, P.
(2002) Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Style. In E. K. Brown, R. E. Asher, & J. M. Y. Simpson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.), Vol. 121 (pp. 196–210). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wales, K.
(1991) A dictionary of stylistics. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar