Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 7:1 (2017) ► pp. 79108
Alexandrov, V. E.
(2007) Literature, literariness, and the brain. Comparative Literature, 59(2), 97–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attebery, B.
(2004) Fantasy as mode, genre, formula. In David Sandner (Ed.), Fantastic literature: a critical reader (pp. 293–309). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Baldick, C.
Benthian, C.
(2012) The Literariness of new media art – a case for expanding the domain of literary studies. Journal of Literary Theory, 61, 311–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cawalti, R. G.
(1976) Adventure, mystery and romance: formula stories as art and popular culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M.
(2005) Approach and selection of popular narrative genre. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 231, 3–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The scientific study of literature: what can, has, and should be done. Scientific Study of Literature, 11, 59–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C.
(2013) Reading other minds: effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 31, 28–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emmott, C., Sanford, A. J., & Dawydiak, E. J.
(2007) Stylistics meet cognitive science: studying style in fiction and readers’ attention from an interdisciplinary perspective. Style, 411, 204–224.Google Scholar
Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E.
(2012) Reader – text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1041, 515–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., Mullin, & Mar, R. A.
(2013) What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivityPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D.
(1998) Reading poetry: an empirical investigation of formalist, stylistic, and conventionalist claims. Poetics Today, 191, 565–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inference [Def. 1]
Iza, M., & Ezquerro, J.
(2000) Elaborative inferences. anales de psicología, 161, 227–249.Google Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 3421, 377–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keegan, K.
(2006) Why fabulist and new wave fabulist stories in an anthology named paraspheres? In Rusty Morrison and Ken Keegan (Eds.), Paraspheres: extending beyond the spheres of literary and genre fiction (pp. 625–637). Richmond, CA: Omnidawn.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W.
(1998) Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, E. M.
(2016) Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 101, 82–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, E. M., & Hakemulder, F.
(2015) Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: a theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 91, 79–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maslin, J.
(2012) The lies that buoy, then break a marriage, ‘Gone Girl,’ by Gillian Flynn. The New York Times, May 29. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from http://​www​.nytimes​.com​/2012​/05​/30​/books​/gone​-girl​-by​-gillian​-flynn​.html
Miall, D. S.
(2009) The neuropsychology of literariness [Abstract]. Conference on Neuroaesthetics, September 24–26, Copenhagen. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from https://​sites​.ualberta​.ca​/~dmiall​/reading​/confer​.htm
(2011) Science in the perspective of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature, 11, 7–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Foregrounding and the sublime: Shelley in Chamonix. Language and Literature, 161, 155–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahapatra, S., Das, J. P., Stack-Cutler, H., & Parrila, R.
(2010) Remediating reading comprehension difficulties: a cognitive processing approach. Reading Psychology, 311, 428–453. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W.
(1996) Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 141, 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S.
(2009) Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 191, 228–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panero, M. E., Black, J., Barnes, J. L., Weisberg, D. S., Goldstein, T. R., Brownell, H., & Winner, E.
(2016) Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1111, e46–e54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peretz, E.
(2014) It’s Tartt – but is it Art? Vanity Fair, July. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from http://​www​.vanityfair​.com​/culture​/2014​/07​/goldfinch​-donna​-tartt​-literary​-criticism
Rice, C.
(2010) Literariness. In Patrick Colm Hogan (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 450–453), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shklovksy, V.
(1970) Sterne’s Tristram Shandy: stylistic commentary. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Eds., Trans.), Russian formalist criticism: four essays (pp. 25–57). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Shen, Y.
(2007) Foregrounding in poetic discourse: between deviation and cognitive constraints. Language and Literature, 16(2), 169–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simerka, B.
(2012) Cognitive theories of genre: The prototype effect and early modern Spanish tragedy. Bulletin of the Comediantes, 641, 153–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, P.
(1984) Russian formalism: A metapoetics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tomashevksy, B.
(1970) Thematics. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Eds., Trans.), Russian Formalist criticism: four essays (pp. 61–98). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Van Peer, W.
(1986) Stylistics and psychology: investigations of foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
(2007) Introduction to foregrounding: a state of the art. Language and Literature, 161, 99–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walczyk, J. J., Wei, M., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Goubert, S. E., Cooper, A. L., & Zha, P.
(2007) Development of the interplay between automatic processes and cognitive resources in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 991, 861–887. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, D. H., Zunshine, L., & Holquist, M.
(2012) Theory of mind and embedding of perspective: A psychological test of a literary “sweet spot.” Scientific Study of Literature, 21, 301–315. Crossref.Google Scholar


The genre effect
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Deane, Paul, Swapna Somasundaran, René R. Lawless, Hilary Persky & Colleen Appel
2019. The Key Practice, Building and Sharing Stories and Social Understandings: The Intrinsic Value of Narrative. ETS Research Report Series 2019:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Eekhof, Lynn S., Kobie van Krieken & Roel M. Willems
2022. Reading about minds: The social-cognitive potential of narratives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Crossref logo
Gavaler, Chris & Dan Johnson
2019. The literary genre effect. Scientific Study of Literature 9:1  pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Joyce, Stephen
2018.  In Transmedia Storytelling and the Apocalypse,  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
Kidd, David & Emanuele Castano
2019. Reading Literary Fiction and Theory of Mind: Three Preregistered Replications and Extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science 10:4  pp. 522 ff. Crossref logo
Nicholes, Justin
2020. Science fiction prototyping’s features and impact on college students’ perceptions of writing. Scientific Study of Literature 10:1  pp. 128 ff. Crossref logo
Quinlan, Joshua A. & Raymond A. Mar
2020.  In The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination,  pp. 466 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Shuai, Kausalai (Kay) Wijekumar & Bing Han
2021. An Analysis of Grade 4 Reading Textbooks used in Mainland China: Do the Texts and Activities Support Higher Order Reading Comprehension Skills?. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 26:2  pp. 251 ff. Crossref logo
Zunshine, Lisa
2020. Embodied Social Cognition and Comparative Literature. Poetics Today 41:2  pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.