Chapter published in:
Learning to Read in a Digital World
Edited by Mirit Barzillai, Jenny Thomson, Sascha Schroeder and Paul van den Broek
[Studies in Written Language and Literacy 17] 2018
► pp. 225–238

Learning to read in a digital world

Discussion

| University of Sheffield
| University of Haifa
| Leiden University
| Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Understanding how to best support children as they learn to read in an increasingly digital world involves recognizing the many child- and text-related aspects of children’s digital reading experience. In the current chapter, we consider how children’s reading skills, goals, as well as the properties of digital text influence children’s reading development in digital environments. We further discuss how schools, parents, media creators, and policy makers can help shape children’s reading experience in digital contexts so that each child is given the tools, skills, and opportunities she needs to reach her full potential in both print and digital environments.
Published online: 09 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.17.10tho
References

References

Abrams, S. S., & Merchant, G.
(2013) The digital challenge. In K. Hall, T. Cremin, B. Comber, & L. C. Moll (Eds.), International handbook of research on children’s literacy, learning, and culture (pp. 319–332). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M.
(2011) Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 18–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T.
(2012) Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1816–1828. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B.
(2009) Determining and describing reading strategies: Internet and traditional forms of reading. In H. S. Waters & W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction (pp. 201–225). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Akbulut, Y.
(2009) Investigating underlying components of the ICT Indicators measurement scale: The extended version . Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4), 405–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akbulut, Y., Kesim, M., & Odabasi, H. F.
(2007) Construct validation of ICT indicators measurement scale (ICTIMS). The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 3(3), 60–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akcaoglu, M., Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., & Boyer, D. M.
(2014) Policy, practice, and reality: Exploring a nation-wide technology implementation in Turkish schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 477–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Communications and Media
(2016) Media and Young Minds. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162591. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron, N.
(2015) Words Onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barzillai, M., Thomson, J., & Mangen, A.
(2017) The influence of E-books on language and literacy development. I: Education and New Technologies: Perils and Promises for Learners. London: Routledge. ISBN  9781315644851.Google Scholar
Bas, G., Kubiatko, M., & Murat, A.
(2016) Teachers’ perceptions towards ICTs in teaching-learning process: Scale validity and reliability study. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 176–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E.
(2006) Reading next – A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.Google Scholar
Carrington, V.
(2005) The uncanny, digital texts and literacy. Language and Education, 19(6), 467–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimmons, G.
(2016) The influence of hyperlinks on reading on the web: An empirical approach (Doctoral thesis). University of Southampton, Southampton.
Flewitt, R., Messer, D., & Kucirkova, N.
(2014) New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 289–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S.
(2001) What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J.
(2017) Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guernsey, L., & Levine, M. H.
(2015) Tap, click, read: Growing readers in a world of screens. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
House of Lords Select Committee on Communications
(2017) Growing up with the Internet. 2nd Report of Session 2016–17 – published 21 March 2017 – HL Paper 130.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. J.
(1979) Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 429–446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Juel, C.
(1988) Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kucirkova, N., & Littleton, K.
(2016) The digital reading habits of children: A National survey of parents’ perceptions of and practices in relation to children’s reading for pleasure with print and digital books. Book Trust. Retrieved from http://​www​.booktrust​.org​.uk​/news​-and​-blogs​/news​/1371.Google Scholar
Kucirkova, N., & Radesky, J.
(2017) Digital media and young children’s learning: How early is too early and why? Review of research on 0–2 year olds. In K. Sheehy & A. Holliman (Eds.), Education and New Technologies: Perils And Promises For Learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, Y., & Lee, J.
(2014) Enhancing pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice. Computers & Education, 73, 121–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. J., & Tedder, M. C.
(2003) The effects of three different computer texts on readers’ recall: Based on working memory capacity. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 767–783. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L.
(2009) EU Kids Online: Final report. LSE, London: EU Kids Online.Google Scholar
Mifsud, C. L., & Grech, L.
(2016) Literacy teaching with tablets in bilingual primary classrooms – The Malta TabLit Study. In N. Kucirkova & G. Falloon (Eds.), Apps, technology and younger learners: International perspectives, empirical evidence, implications for practice (pp. 89–102). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M.
(2013) On the necessity to use person-specific data analysis approaches in psychology. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 29–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, M. A., Cano, C. A., Gorospe, J. M. C., Pérez, M. E. D. M., Pons, J. D. P., Labra, J. P., Chacón, J. P., Mesa, A. L. S., & Valverde-Berrocoso, J.
(2014) Las políticas educativas TIC en España después del Programa Escuela 2.0: las tendencias que emergen/ICT education policies in Spain after School Program 2.0: Emerging Trends. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa-RELATEC, 13(2), 11–33.Google Scholar
OECD
(2015), Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. PISA, OECD Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ofcom
(2016) Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report 2016. London, UK: Office of Communications.Google Scholar
Pelgrum, W. J., & Voogt, J.
(2009) School and teacher factors associated with frequency of ICT use by mathematics teachers: Country comparisons. Education and Information Technologies, 14(4), 293–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
RAND Reading Study Group, & Snow, C.
(2002) Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA; Arlington, VA; Pittsburgh, PA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Rose, L. T., Rouhani, P., & Fischer, K. W.
(2013) The science of the individual. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7, 152–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salmerón, L., Macedo-Rouet, M., & Rouet, J-F.
(2016) Multiple viewpoints increase students’ attention to source features in social question and answer forum messages. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 2404–2419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J.
(2009) To scroll or not to scroll: Scrolling, working memory capacity, and comprehending complex texts. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 51(5), 730–738. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J., & Prieler, T.
(2017) Evaluating the effect of exposure to digital text on early literacy development. Unpublished raw data.
Tondeur, J., Valcke, M., & van Braak, J.
(2008) A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: Teacher and school characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 494–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turbill, J.
(2001) A researcher goes to school: Using technology in the kindergarten literacy curriculum. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1(3), 255–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Sormunen, K., Dillon, P., & Sointu, E.
(2015) The impact of authentic learning experiences with ICT on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use ICT for teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 81, 49–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Broek, P., Fletcher, C. R., & Risden, K.
(1993) Investigations of inferential processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration. Discourse Processes, 16, 169–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, M.
(2010) Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(3), 211.Google Scholar
Wolf, M.
(2016) Tales of literacy for the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Petrová, Zuzana & Rastislav Nemec
2019. Changing reading paths in a digital age: What are the consequences for meaning-making?. Journal of Pedagogy 10:2 ► pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.