Propositions on cross-cultural communication and translation
Cross-cultural communication can be characterized by a relatively high degree of effort required to reduce complexity, by relatively high transaction costs, by relatively low trust between communication partners, and by relatively narrow success conditions that create points of high-risk discourse. To communicate successfully between cultures would thus require a special kind of risk management. Translation, as a mode of cross-cultural communication, is held to share those same features, as well as at least two specific representational maxims concerning discursive persons and textual quantity. It is argued that the related concepts of complexity, success conditions and risk can describe not only the act of translating as a mode of cross-cultural communication, but also certain features of the professional intercultures to which translators belong. Step-by-step propositions thus synthesize an approach that runs from an analysis of cross-cultural communication to a description of professional intercultures, their sources of power, and the reasons for their apparent lack of power in a globalizing age.
Article outline
- 1.On cross-cultural communication in general
- 2.On complexity and its reduction
- 3.On success conditions
- 4.On transaction costs
- 5.On the specificity of cross-cultural communication
- 6.On the size of communication acts
- 7.Translation versus language learning
- 8.On the nature of translation
- 9.On trust
- 10.On risk
- 11.On the nature of translation problems
- 12.Why and how complexity is reduced
- 13.On the nature of communication participants
- 14.On the nature of professional intercultures
- 15.Professional intercultures and the boundaries between cultures
- 16.Membership and identity of professional intercultures
- 17.The power of professional intercultures
- 18.Globalization and cross-cultural communication
- 19.The powerlessness of intercultures
- 20.The future of cross-cultural communication
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.16.1.02pym
References
Cited by
Cited by 29 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.