Propositions on cross-cultural communication and translation
Anthony Pym | Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
Cross-cultural communication can be characterized by a relatively high degree of effort required to reduce complexity, by relatively high transaction costs, by relatively low trust between communication partners, and by relatively narrow success conditions that create points of high-risk discourse. To communicate successfully between cultures would thus require a special kind of risk management. Translation, as a mode of cross-cultural communication, is held to share those same features, as well as at least two specific representational maxims concerning discursive persons and textual quantity. It is argued that the related concepts of complexity, success conditions and risk can describe not only the act of translating as a mode of cross-cultural communication, but also certain features of the professional intercultures to which translators belong. Step-by-step propositions thus synthesize an approach that runs from an analysis of cross-cultural communication to a description of professional intercultures, their sources of power, and the reasons for their apparent lack of power in a globalizing age.
Keywords: communication theory, cross-cultural communication, translation, complexity theory, risk management, intercultures, power
Article outline
- 1.On cross-cultural communication in general
- 2.On complexity and its reduction
- 3.On success conditions
- 4.On transaction costs
- 5.On the specificity of cross-cultural communication
- 6.On the size of communication acts
- 7.Translation versus language learning
- 8.On the nature of translation
- 9.On trust
- 10.On risk
- 11.On the nature of translation problems
- 12.Why and how complexity is reduced
- 13.On the nature of communication participants
- 14.On the nature of professional intercultures
- 15.Professional intercultures and the boundaries between cultures
- 16.Membership and identity of professional intercultures
- 17.The power of professional intercultures
- 18.Globalization and cross-cultural communication
- 19.The powerlessness of intercultures
- 20.The future of cross-cultural communication
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 21 February 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.16.1.02pym
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.16.1.02pym
References
Agar, Michael
1994 Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: William Morrow.
Bourdieu, Pierre
1979 Le sens pratique. Paris: Minuit.
Chatwin, Bruce
1987 The songlines. London: Picador.
Chesterman, Andrew
1994a “From ‘is’ to ‘ought’: Laws, norms and strategies in Translation Studies”. Target 5:1. 1–20. 
1994b “Karl Popper in the translation class”. Cay Dollerup and Annette Lindegaard, eds. Teaching translation and interpreting 2: Insights, aims and visions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1994 89–95.
1997 Memes of translation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2001 “Proposal for a Hieronymic oath”. Anthony Pym, ed. The return to ethics. Special issue of The translator 7:2. 139–154.
Colas, Dominique
1992 “Les politiques d’aide”. Françoise Barret-Ducrocq, ed. Traduire l’Europe. Paris: Payot 1992 97–123.
Even-Zohar, Itamar
1981 “Translation theory today: A call for transfer theory”. Poetics today 2:4. 1–7.
1990 “Translation and transfer”. Poetics today 11:1, special issue on Polysystem Studies 1990 73–78.
2001 “Laws of cultural interference (draft in work)”. http://www.tau.ac.il/~itamarez/papers/culture-interference.htm. Consulted April 2004.
Frow, John
1995 Cultural studies and cultural value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gile, Daniel
1995 Basic concepts and models for translator and interpreter training. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and conversation”. Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, eds. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press 1975 41–58.
Gutt, Ernst-August
1991 Translation and relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Halverson, Sandra
1999 “Conceptual work and the ‘translation’ concept”. Target 11:1. 1–31.
Holmes, James S.
1988 “Forms of verse translation and the translation of verse form”. Translated!: Papers on literary translation and Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi 1988 23–33.
Holz-Mänttäri, Justa
1984 Translatorisches Handeln: Theorie und Methode. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
Katz, Jerrold
1978 “Effability and translation”. F. Guenther and M. Guenther-Reutter, eds. Meaning and translation: Philosophical and linguistic approaches. London: Duckworth 1978 191–234.
Keohane, Robert O.
1984 After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lambert, José
1989 “La traduction, les langues et la communication de masse: Les ambiguïtés du discours international”. Target 1:2. 215–237.
Levý, Jiří
1967 “Translation as a decision process”. Reprinted in Andrew Chesterman, ed. Readings in translation theory. Helsinki: Oy Finn Lectura Ab 1989 37–52.
Luhmann, Niklas
1989 Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität, 3. durchgesehene Auflage. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.
Mayoral, Roberto
2003 Translating official documents. Manchester: St Jerome.
Monacelli, Claudia and Roberto Punzo
2001 “Ethics in the fuzzy domain of interpreting: A ‘military’ perspective”. Anthony Pym, ed. The return to ethics. Special issue of The translator
7:2. 265–282.
Pym, Anthony
1992a Translation and text transfer: An essay on the principles of intercultural communication. Frankfurt/Main, Berlin, Bern, New York, Paris, Vienna: Peter Lang.
1992b “The relations between translation and material text transfer”. Target 4:2. 171–189.
1992c “Translation error analysis and the interface with language teaching”. Cay Dollerup and Anne Loddegaard, eds. The teaching of translation: Training talent and experience. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1992 279–288.
1993 Epistemological problems in translation and its teaching. Calaceite: Caminade.
1995 “Translation as a transaction cost”. Meta 40:4. 594–605.
1996 “Multilingual intertextuality in translation”. Beatriz Penas Ibáñez, ed. The intertextual dimension of discourse. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza 1996 207–218.
1997 Pour une éthique du traducteur. Arras: Artois Presses Université/Ottawa: Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa.
1998 Method in translation history. Manchester: St Jerome.
2000a “On cooperation”. Maeve Olohan, ed. Intercultural faultlines: Research models in Translation Studies I: Textual and cognitive aspects. Manchester: St Jerome 2000 181–192.
2000b Negotiating the frontier: Translators and intercultures in Hispanic history. Manchester: St Jerome.
2001a “Alternatives to borders in translation theory”.
Athanor (Bari) 12, nuova serie: Lo stesso altro
, ed. Susan Petrilli 2001 172–182.
2001b “Four remarks on translation and multimedia”. Yves Gambier and Henrik Gottlieb, eds. Multimedia translation: Concepts, practices, and research. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2001 275–282.
2003a “Redefining translation competence in an electronic age”. Meta 48:3. 481–497.
2003b “Translation Studies should help solve social problems”. Georges Androulakis, ed. Translating in the 21st century: Trends and prospects. Proceedings. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University 2003 439–448.
2004 The moving text: Localization, translation, and distribution. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Quine, Willard Van Orman
1960 Word and object. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
1988 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Sprung, Robert C.
ed. 2000 Translating into success: Cutting-edge strategies for going multilingual in a global age. American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series XI. Amsterdam/Philadelphia John Benjamins.
Stecconi, Ubaldo
2002 “Not a melting pot: The challenges of multilingual communication in the European Commission”. Paper delivered to conference The translation industry today. Rimini, Italy, 11–13 October 2002.
Toury, Gideon
1995 Descriptive Translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2002 “What’s the problem with ‘translation problem’?”. Marcel Thelen and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, eds. Translation and meaning Part 6: Proceedings of the 3rd International Maastricht–Lódź Duo Colloquium. Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht 2002 57–71.
Cited by
Cited by 29 other publications
No author info given
2007. Interpreting and translating.
In Communication Across Cultures,
► pp. 140 ff. 
No author info given
2014. Translating language and culture.
In Communication across Cultures,
► pp. 187 ff.
Abdallah, Kristiina & Kaisa Koskinen
2008. Managing Trust: Translating and the Network Economy.
Meta 52:4 ► pp. 673 ff.
Achkasov, Andrei
2021. Locales and Interlanguage Communication.
Translation Studies: Theory and Practice 1:1 (1) ► pp. 29 ff.
Colón Rodríguez, Raúl E.
2020. Marais, Kobus (2019) : A (Bio)Semiotic Theory of Translation. The Emergence of Social-Cultural Reality. New York/Londres : Routledge, 208 p. .
Meta: Journal des traducteurs 65:1 ► pp. 272 ff.
Conde, Tomás
2013. The Good Guys and the Bad Guys: The Behavior of Lenient and Demanding Translation Evaluators.
Meta 57:3 ► pp. 763 ff.
Davies, Eirlys E.
2012. Translation and Intercultural Communication: Bridges and Barriers.
In The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication,
► pp. 367 ff.
Fraser, Ryan
2021. The Copy Effect in Translation: On Formal Similarity and the Book Historic
Perspective.
TTR 33:2 ► pp. 13 ff.
Ghosh, Aditi
2019. Intercultural Communication in the Multilingual Urban Workplace.
In The Wiley Handbook of Global Workplace Learning,
► pp. 301 ff.
Hermans, Theo
2014. Positioning translators: Voices, views and values in translation.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 23:3 ► pp. 285 ff.
Korhonen, Annamari
2023. When and how to revise?.
Translation, Cognition & Behavior
Liddicoat, Anthony J.
2016. Translation as intercultural mediation: setting the scene.
Perspectives 24:3 ► pp. 347 ff.
Margala, Miriam
2009. Grice in Translation: The Case of Hrabal.
Journal of Universal Language 10:2 ► pp. 87 ff.
Martín de León, Celia
2008. Skopos and beyond.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
McAuley, Thomas E.
2015. Audience Attitude and Translation Reception.
Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 61:2 ► pp. 219 ff.
Mossop, Brian
2005. Pym, Anthony. 2004. The moving text: Localization, translation, and distribution.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 17:2 ► pp. 363 ff.
Olohan, Maeve & Elena Davitti
2017. Dynamics of Trusting in Translation Project Management: Leaps of Faith and Balancing Acts.
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 46:4 ► pp. 391 ff.
Poupaud, Sandra, Anthony Pym & Ester Torres Simón
2009. Finding Translations. On the Use of Bibliographical Databases in Translation History.
Meta 54:2 ► pp. 264 ff.
Pym, Anthony
2007. On history in formal conceptualizations of translation.
Across Languages and Cultures 8:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Røvik, Kjell Arne
2016. Knowledge Transfer as Translation: Review and Elements of an Instrumental Theory.
International Journal of Management Reviews 18:3 ► pp. 290 ff.
Scarpa, Federica
2020. Introducing Specialised Translation.
In Research and Professional Practice in Specialised Translation,
► pp. 1 ff.
Scarpa, Federica
2020. Theoretical Issues in Specialised Translation.
In Research and Professional Practice in Specialised Translation,
► pp. 111 ff.
Stecconi, Ubaldo
2019. How translations are willed into existence.
Slovo.ru: Baltic accent 10:3 ► pp. 69 ff.
Sulaiman, M Zain & Rita Wilson
2018. Translating tourism promotional materials: a cultural-conceptual model.
Perspectives 26:5 ► pp. 629 ff.
Sulaiman, M. Zain & Rita Wilson
2019. Applying and Evaluating the CCT Model in the Industry.
In Translation and Tourism,
► pp. 187 ff.
Wang, Vincent X.
2009. Pragmatic shifts in two translations of Fusheng Liuji
.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 21:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Zafiri, Makrina & Evangelos Kourdis
2017. Languages in Contact, Cultures in Contact: Verbal and Iconic Visual Signs in Mother Tongue and Culture as Mediators in Teaching English as a Foreign Language.
Signs and Society 5:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Zagood, Mohammed Juma, Alhanoof Humaid Almazrouei, Mariam Saeed Alnaqbi & Fatma Abdullah Almheiri
2022. Translating Taboos: An Analysis of the Arabic Translation of Manson’s ‘The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck’.
In Concepts, Discourses, and Translations [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 299 ff.
Łabendowicz, Olga
2018. Chapter 12. The impact of AVT mode on audience reception.
In Eye Tracking and Multidisciplinary Studies on Translation [Benjamins Translation Library, 143],
► pp. 259 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.