Cover not available
Article published In:
Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research
Edited by Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Susanne Göpferich and Sharon O'Brien
[Target 25:1] 2013
► pp. 46–60

Towards a new linguistic-cognitive orientation in translation studies

| University of Hamburg, Germany
A new linguistic-cognitive orientation in translation studies is important today because it can complement the current strong wave of socially and culturally oriented research into and around translation. For balance, it is also necessary and insightful to describe and explain how strategies of comprehending, decisionmaking and re-verbalisation come about in a translator’s bilingual mind. In this paper I sketch some ideas about such a new linguistic-cognitive approach. I first review introspective and retrospective studies and behavioural experiments. Secondly, I assess the value of neuro-linguistic studies for translation. Thirdly, I suggest a new combination of a translation theory and a neuro-functional theory of bilingualism.
Keywords: introspection, consciousness, neuro-linguistic studies, neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism, systemic-functional translation theory, pragmatics, overt and covert translation
Article outline
  • 1.A plea for a new linguistic-cognitive orientation in translation studies
  • 2.Rationale for a new linguistic-cognitive orientation
  • 3.Introspective and retrospective translation process studies: how valid and reliable are their outcomes?
  • 4.Behavioural experiments on the translation process: how valid, reliable and insightful are their outcomes?
  • 5.Bilingual neuro-imaging studies: how useful and relevant are they for translation studies?
  • 6.A neuro-linguistic theory of the functioning of two languages in the brain
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 4 March 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.1.05hou
References (51)
References
Abutalebi, Jubin. 2008. “Neural Aspects of Second Language Representation and Language Control.” Acta Psychologica 1281: 466–478.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alves, Fabio, Adriana Pagano, Stella Neumann, Erich Steiner, and Silvia Hansen-Schirra. 2010. “Translation Units and Grammatical Shifts: Towards an Integration of Product- and Process-Based Translation Research.” In ”Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve and Erik Angelone, 109–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aue, Tatjana, Leah Lavelle, and John Cacioppo. 2009. “Great Expectations: What can fMRI Research Tell Us about Psychological Phenomena?” International Journal of Psychophysiology 73 (1): 10–16.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mona. 2006. Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. In Other Words. A Course Book on Translation, 2nd ed. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1923/1992. “The Task of the Translator.” English Translation by Harry Zohn. In “The Task of the Translator.” English Translation by Harry Zohn.Theories of Translation. An Anthology of Essays from Dryden to Derrida, ed. by Rainer Schulte and John Biguenet, 71–82. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael, and Daniel Dennett. 2011. “Consciousness cannot be Separated from Function.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (8): 358–364.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Vivian, and Benedetta Bassetti (eds). 2011. Language and Bilingual Cognition. New York: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dragsted, Barbara. 2012. “Indicators of Difficulty in Translation: Correlating Product and Process Data.” Across Languages and Cultures 13 (1): 81–98.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentzler, Edwin. 2008. Translation and Identity in the Americas. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Göpferich, Susanne. 2008. Translationsprozessforschung: Stand — Methoden — Perspektiven. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Göpferich, Susanne, and Riitta Jääskeläinen (eds). 2009. “Process Research into the Development of Translation Competence: Where are We, and Where do We Need to Go?” Across Languages and Cultures 10 (2): 169–191.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Groot, Annette. 1997. “The Cognitive Study of Translation and Interpretation: Three Approaches.” In ”Cognitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting, ed. by Joseph H. Danks Gregory Shreve, Stephen Fountain and Michael McBeath, 25–56. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Halverson, Sandra. 2009. “Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Approaches.” In ”Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, 2nd ed., ed. by Mona Baker and Gabriela Saldanha, 211–216. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Cognitive Translation Studies: Developments in Theory and Methods.” In ”Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve and Erik Angelone, 349–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Gyde. 2010. “Integrative Description of Translation Processes.” In ”Translation and Cognition, ed. by Gregory Shreve and Erik Angelone, 189–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermans, Theo. 1985. The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hernandez, Arturo. 2009. “Language Switching in the Bilingual Brain: What’s Next?” Brain and Language 1091: 133–140.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane. 1977. A Model for Translation Quality Assessment, 2nd ed. 1981. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Talking to Oneself or Thinking with Others? On Using Different Thinking Aloud Methods in Translation.” Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen 171: 84–98.Google Scholar
. 1997. Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Re-Visited. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 2006a. “Communicative Styles in English and German.” Journal of English Studies 10 (3): 249–267.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. “Text and Context in Translation.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (3): 338–358.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Translation and Bilingual Cognition.” In ”Language and Bilingual Cognition, ed. by Vivian Cook and Benedetta Bassetti, 519–528. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Translation, Interpreting and Intercultural Communication.” In ”The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication, ed. by Jane Jackson, 495–509. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
House, Juliane, and Shoshana Blum-Kulka (eds). 1986. Interlingual and Intercultural Communication. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Jääskeläinen, Riitta. 2011. “Back to Basics: Designing a Study to Determine the Validity and Reliability of Verbal Report Data on Translation Processes.” In ”Cognitive Explorations of Translation, ed. by Sharon O’Brien, 15–29. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke. 2003. “Effects of Think Aloud on Translation Speed, Revision and Segmentation.” In ”Triangulating Translation. Perspectives in Process Oriented Research, ed. by Fabio Alves, 69–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Denise, Robert Zatorre, Jen-Kai Chen, Brenda Milner, Joelle Crane, Pascal Belin, and Marc Bouffard. 2006. “Bilingual Brain Organisation: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Adaptation Study.” Neuroimage 311: 366–375.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Werner. 2011. Einführung in die Übersetzungswissenschaft, 8th ed. Tübingen: Francke (UTB).Google Scholar
Königs, Frank. 1986. “Adhoc versus Rest-Block: textuelle Elemente als Auslöser des Übersetzungsprozesses und didaktische Entscheidungshilfen.” In ”Neue Entwicklungen in der Angewandten Linguistik, ed. by Wolfgang Kühlwein, 15–36. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Krings, Hans. 1986. Was in den Köpfen von Übersetzern vorgeht. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Malmkjaer, Kirsten. 2011a. “Linguistics and Translation. ”Handbook of Translation Studies, vol. 21, ed. byYves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 349–358. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. “Translation Universals.” In ”The Oxford Handbook of Translation Studies, ed. by Kirsten Malmkjaer and Kevin Windle, 83–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nosek, Brian, Carlee Hawkins, and Rebecca Frasier. 2011. “Implicit Social Cognition: from Measures to Mechanisms.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (4): 152–159.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon (ed). 2011. Cognitive Explorations of Translation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Paradis, Michel. 2004. A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Price, Cathy, David Green, and Roswitha von Studnitz. 1999. “A Functional Imaging Study of Translation and Language Switching.” Brain 1221: 2221–2235.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prunč, Erich. 2011. Entwicklungslinien der Translationswissenschaft. Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Reiss, Katharina, and Hans Vermeer. 1984. Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shamma, Tarek. 2009. Translation and the Manipulation of Difference. Manchester: St.Google Scholar
Shreve, Gregory, and Erik Angelone (eds). 2010. Translation and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sontag, Susan. 1961. Against Interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sperber, Daniel. 1996. Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stolze, Radegundis. 2003. Hermeneutik und Translation. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Suhler, Christopher, and Patricia Churchland. 2011. “Control: Conscious and Otherwise.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (8): 341–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja. 2004. “Unique Items: Over- or Underrepresented in Translated Language?” In Translation Universals—Do They Exist? ed. by Anna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki, 177–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria. 2007. Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Wilss, Wolfram. 1996. Knowledge and Skills in Translator Behaviour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (25)

Cited by 25 other publications

Akbari, Alireza & Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari
2024. Challenging the illusion of objectivity: an in-depth analysis of the preselected items evaluation (PIE) method in translation evaluation. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education DOI logo
Liu, Xiaodong
2024. Mapping translation process research: A bibliographic study on special issues since year 2005. Forum for Linguistic Studies 6:2 ► pp. 1169 ff. DOI logo
Mohammed Nihad Ahmed , Mohammed Nihad Ahmed
2024. Translation of Arabic Novel "American Granddaughter" into English: Cognitive Scripts Theory. Al-Noor Journal for Humanities 2:2 DOI logo
de Baets, Pauline & Gert de Sutter
2023. How do translators select among competing (near-)synonyms in translation?. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 35:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Denroche, Charles
2023. Translating figurative language. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:1 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Mellinger, Christopher D. & Thomas A. Hanson
2022. Considerations of ecological validity in cognitive translation and interpreting studies. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Li, Long & Xi Li
2021. Who ‘let all this happen’? Shifts of responsibilities in representing the Cultural Revolution in Jung Chang’s Wild Swans. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 30:1 ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Walker, Callum
2021. The Cognitive Paradigm in Translation Studies. In An Eye-Tracking Study of Equivalent Effect in Translation, ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Zhihong & Defeng Li
2021. Translation Competence Revisited: Toward a Pedagogical Model of Translation Competence. In Advances in Cognitive Translation Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Olalla-Soler, Christian
2020. Practices and attitudes toward replication in empirical translation and interpreting studies. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 32:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Cohen, Imogen
2018. On randomness. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 30:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Fotheringham, Christopher
2017. A cognitive-pragmatic model for translation-shift analysis in descriptive case studies. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 35:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Kruger, Haidee & Jan‐Louis Kruger
2017. Cognition and Reception. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Li, Long
2017. An examination of ideology in translation via modality: Wild Swans and Mao’s Last Dancer . Journal of World Languages 4:2 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Li, Long
2020. Shifts of agency in translation: a case study of the Chinese translation of Wild Swans. Meta 65:1 ► pp. 168 ff. DOI logo
Martín, Ricardo Muñoz
2017. Looking Toward the Future of Cognitive Translation Studies. In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, ► pp. 555 ff. DOI logo
Vandevoorde, Lore, Els Lefever, Koen Plevoets & Gert De Sutter
2017. A corpus-based study of semantic differences in translation. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 29:3 ► pp. 388 ff. DOI logo
Kruger, Haidee
2016. Fluency/resistancy and domestication/foreignisation. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 28:1 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Boyden, Michael
2014. Counting blessings (and sheep). Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 26:2 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Halverson, Sandra L.
2014. Reorienting Translation Studies: Cognitive Approaches and the Centrality of the Translator. In Translation: A Multidisciplinary Approach, ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane
2014. Introduction. In Translation: A Multidisciplinary Approach, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane
2014. Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present. In Translation: A Multidisciplinary Approach, ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane
2019. Suggestions for a New Interdisciplinary Linguo-cognitive Theory in Translation Studies. In Researching Cognitive Processes of Translation [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Aspects of Cohesion and Coherence in Translation [Benjamins Translation Library, 134], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Chapter 8. Summary and conclusions. In Aspects of Cohesion and Coherence in Translation [Benjamins Translation Library, 134], ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.