Article published in:
Target
Vol. 25:2 (2013) ► pp. 228–251

Translating anglophobia

Tensions and paradoxes of biliterate performances in Singapore

| The University of Hong Kong
This article examines problems arising from biliterate performances in English and Chinese in the context of the sociolinguistics of Singapore. The questions asked include: What are the ramifications of translating Chinese literature carrying anglophobic themes into English? How might translation displace anglophobic readings from Chinese literary works? What kind of identity discourse do self-translation practices engender? The article examines three cases of cross-linguistic practice as biliterate modalities in Singapore, with an eye on the identity discourse emanating from the translational space between English and Chinese in each case. In the first case, it is argued that the English translation of a Chinese poem with an anglophobic stance triggers an ironic self-reflexivity on the part of the target text reader and has the potential to exacerbate the cultural anxiety faced by the Chinese-speaking Self in the source text. The second case presents an example where the anglophobic interpretation of a Chinese play can potentially be ‘unread’ through the homogenization of code-switching through translation. In the final case of a self-translating playwright, it is found that English-Chinese and Chinese-English translations establish an asymmetric symbiosis whereby translation creates an interliminal space in which a hybrid identity discourse is negotiated. The three cases illustrate the tensions and paradoxes residing in the translational space between English and Chinese in Singapore, pointing to the problematic of interand cross-cultural communication in the multilingual state.
Keywords: anglophobia, language ideology, biliterate modality, identity discourse, translation
Published online: 17 May 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.2.04lee
References

[ p. 250 ]References

Berman, Antoine
1985/2004 “La traduction comme épreuve de l’étranger.” Texte 4: 67–81. Trans. Lawrence Venuti as “Translation and the Trials of the Foreign.” In The Translation Studies Reader (Second edn), ed. by Lawrence Venuti, 276–289. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi
1994 The Location of Culture. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Bokhorst-Heng, Wendy D.
1999 Language Is More Than a Language. Singapore: Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C.
1983 The Rhetoric of Fiction (Second edn). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casanova, Pascale
2005 “Literature as a World.” New Left Review 31: 71–90.Google Scholar
Chan, Leo T.H.
2010 Readers, Reading and Reception of Translated Fiction in Chinese: Novel Encounters. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Chen, Rongzhao (ed.)
Xinjiapo dangdai huawen wenxue zuopin xuan. Xiaoshuo shang/ xia juan [An anthology of contemporary Singapore Chinese literature. Fiction; in 2 vols.]. Hong Kong and Singapore: Mingpao Monthly and Youth Book Company.
Dixon, L. Quentin
2009 “Bilingual Education Policy in Singapore: An Analysis of Its Sociohistorical Roots and Current Academic Outcomes.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 8 (1): 25–47.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grutman, Rainier
2006 “Refraction and Recognition: Literary Multilingualism in Translation.” Target 18 (1): 17–47.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Multilingualism.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies (Second edn), ed. by Mona Baker, and Gabriela Saldanha, 182–185. Abigdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil, and Ian Mason
1997 The Translator as Communicator. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ho, Elaine Y.L.
2010 “Chinese English, English Chinese: Biliteracy and Translation.” In Hong Kong Culture: Word and Image, ed. by Kam Louie, 55–73. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Hokenson, Jan W., and Marcella Munson
2007 The Bilingual Text: History and Theory of Literary Self-translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B.
1992 “Models in Non-native English.” In The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures (Second edn), ed. by Braj B. Kachru, 48–74. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, Pao Kun [Guo Bao Kun]
1995 Bianyuan yixiang: Guobaokun xiju zuopinji (1983–1992) [Images at the margins: A collection of Kuo Pao Kun’s plays (1983–1992)]. Singapore: Shibao chubanshe.Google Scholar
Kuo, Pao Kun
2000 Images at the Margins: A Collection of Kuo Pao Kun’s Plays. Singapore: Times Media.Google Scholar
Lee, Tong King
2009 “Asymmetry in Translating Heterolingualism: A Singapore Case Study.” Perspectives 17 (1): 63–75.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa, and Joseph A. Foley
2004 “English in Singapore and Singapore English.” In Singapore English: A Grammatical Description, ed. by Lisa Lim, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meylaerts, Reine
2006 “Literary Heteroglossia in Translation: When the Language of Translation is the Locus of Ideological Struggle.” In Translation Studies at the Interface of Disciplines, ed. by João F. Duarte, Alexandra A. Rosa, and Teresa Seruya, 85–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mezei, Kathy
1998 “Bilingualism and Translation in/of Michèle Lalonde’s Speak White.” The Translator 4 (2): 229–247.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 251 ]
Ministry of Education, Singapore
2004 Report of the Chinese Language Curriculum and Pedagogy Review Committee. Singapore: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Ong, Keng Sen
2000 “Directing Lao Jiu: A Process of Excavation.” In Images at the Margins: A Collection of Kuo Pao Kun’s Plays, 306–315. Singapore: Times Media.Google Scholar
Quah, Sy Ren
2000 Shizhong yinzhe/Invisibility. Trans. Sim Pern Yiau Singapore: Ethos Books.Google Scholar
2004 “Form as Ideology: Representing the Multicultural in Singapore Theatre.” In Ask Not: The Necessary Stage in Singapore Theatre, ed. by Tan Chong Kee, and Tisa Ng, 27–42. Singapore: Times Edition.Google Scholar
2006 “Performing Multilingualism in Singapore.” In Between Tongues: Translation and/of/in Performance in Asia, ed. by Jennifer Lindsay, 88–103. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Rappa, Antonio L., and Lionel Wee
2006 Language Policy and Modernity in Southeast Asia: Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew
2007 “Singapore.” In Language and National Identity in Asia, ed. by Andrew Simpson, 374–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard
2004 Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
St. André, James (ed.)
2001 Droplets/Diandi. Singapore: Department of Chinese Studies, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
St. André, James
2006a “You Can Never Go Home Again’: Cultural Memory and Identity Formation in the Writing of Southeast Asian Chinese.” Journal of Chinese Overseas 2 (1): 33–55.Google Scholar
2006b “Revealing the Invisible: Heterolingualism in Three Generations of Singaporean Playwrights.” Target 18 (2): 139–161.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Statistics, Singapore
2006 General Household Survey 2005, Statistical Release 1: Sociodemographic and Economic Characteristics. Accessed 25 September 2010, http://​www​.singstat​.gov​.sg​/pubn​/popn​/ghsr1​.html.
Tan, Eugene K.B.
2002 “Reconceptualizing Chinese Identity: The Politics of Chineseness in Singapore.” In Ethnic Chinese in Singapore and Malaysia: A Dialogue Between Tradition and Modernity, ed. by Leo Suryadinata, 109–136. Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar