Article published In:
Discourse Analysis in Translation StudiesEdited by Jeremy Munday and Meifang Zhang
[Target 27:3] 2015
► pp. 387–405
Edited by Jeremy Munday and Meifang Zhang
[Target 27:3] 2015
► pp. 387–405
Institutional power in and behind discourse
A case study of SARS notices and their translations used in Macao
This article takes a critical approach to the study of the SARS notices and their translations from the perspective of discourse analysis. Drawing upon the insights of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) and critical discourse analysis (CDA), this study explores how language is used by different governmental institutions in shaping their social power and hierarchy. By conducting a comparative study of the SARS notices and their translations, focusing on speech roles, speech functions, modality types and modality orientation, the authors argue that choices made in producing the texts reflect the institutions’ social roles and their relationship with each other and with the audience. They also argue that the application of concepts from SFL in detailed text analysis and from CDA in the overall discussion may better reveal how different models of discourse analysis can supplement each other and be applied to translation studies.
Keywords: discourse analysis, translation studies, language, power
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Interaction in the discourse
- 2.1Speech roles and speech functions
- 2.2Modality types and modal orientation
- 3.Data and method
- 4.Results and sample analysis
- 4.1Speech roles and speech functions
- 4.2Modality types and orientations
- 5.Concluding discussion: Power behind discourse
- 5.1SARS notice discourse as a social practice
- 5.2SARS notice discourse reflecting social relationships
- 5.3SARS notices reflecting social change
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgement
- Notes
-
References
References (19)
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K., and Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.
Kang, Ji-Hae. 2007. “Recontextualization of News Discourse: A Case Study of Translation of News Discourse on North Korea.” The Translator 13 (2): 219–242. 
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. “Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language.” In Subject and Topic, ed. by Charles N. Li, 457–489. London: Academic Press.
. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Martin, J.R., and Peter R.R. White. 2008. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Mayr, Andrea. 2008. Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse. London: Continuum.
Munday, Jeremy. 2012a. Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
. 2012b. Evaluation in Translation: Critical Points of Translator Decision-making. Abingdon: Routledge.
Schäffner, Christina. 2012. “Unknown Agents in Translated Political Discourse.” Target 24 (1): 103–125.
Thompson, Geoff. 1996. Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2008. Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vinay, Jean-Paul, and Jean Darbelnet. 1995. Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer, eds. 2009. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Chen, Shukun, Aiping Mo & Shu Yang
2023. ‘We should have a deep understanding’: reinstantiating cognitive processes in the translation of Chinese political discourse. Perspectives ► pp. 1 ff. 
Cheng, Shi
2023. A review of interpersonal metafunction studies in systemic functional linguistics (2012–2022). Journal of World Languages 0:0
Chen, Ningyang
2022. Discursive construction in multilingual crisis risk communication: An analysis of ‘A letter to foreign nationals’ messages in China’s COVID-19 fight. Discourse Studies 24:4 ► pp. 404 ff.
Chen, Shukun, Winfred Wenhui Xuan & Hailing Yu
2022. Applying systemic functional linguistics in translation studies. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 68:4 ► pp. 517 ff.
Kang, Ji-Hae & Jung-Wook Hong
2020. Volunteer translators as ‘committed individuals’ or ‘providers of free labor’? The discursive construction of ‘volunteer translators’ in a commercial online learning platform translation controversy. Meta 65:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Schäffner, Christina
2019. Translation and Discourse Analysis. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent 10:3 ► pp. 28 ff.
Munday, Jeremy
2018. Chapter 5.3. Translation analysis. In A History of Modern Translation Knowledge [Benjamins Translation Library, 142], ► pp. 301 ff.
Munday, Jeremy
2018. A model of appraisal: Spanish interpretations of President Trump’s inaugural address 2017. Perspectives 26:2 ► pp. 180 ff.
Pan, Hanting & Meifang Zhang
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.