Article published In:
TASKVol. 4:1 (2024) ► pp.49–77
French writing tasks for undergraduate learners
A task-based needs analysis
This study triangulated multiple data sources and methods to identify the real-world needs of undergraduate
students in a French as a second language program. Graduates (
N = 130) and current students
(
N = 67) rated the importance of a series of written production, interaction, and mediation tasks detailed in the
CEFR Companion Volume (
Council of Europe, 2020). A subset of alumni
(
N = 5) participated in focus group interviews. Results indicated that all participants placed primary importance
on writing for personal communication (i.e., correspondence, forms, creative writing, relaying information, online interaction).
Similarly, interviewees discussed the importance of non-academic writing in their work and daily lives, and highlighted challenges
associated with correspondence, writing teaching materials, and academic writing. Findings suggest a need for writing instruction
in diverse real-world genres for both personal interaction and academic writing.
Article outline
- Background and motivation
- Identification of writing tasks for learners of FSL
- The L2 French program
- Method
- Participants
- Materials
- Job placement records
- Open-ended questionnaire
- Interviews
- Closed-item survey
- Procedure
- Analysis
- Results
- Discussion
- Pedagogical implications, limitations, and future directions
- Conclusion
-
References
References (26)
References
Abdi Tabari, M. (2020). Differential
effects of strategic planning and task structure on L2 writing outcomes. Reading & Writing
Quarterly,
36
(4), 320–338.
Abdi Tabari, M., & Miller, M. (2021). Unraveling
the effects of task sequencing on the syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency of L2 written
production. Canadian Journal of Applied
Linguistics,
24
(2), 1–29.
Allaw, E., & McDonough, K. (2019). The
effect of task sequencing on second language written lexical complexity, accuracy, and
fluency. System,
85
1, 102–114.
Brown, J. D. (1995). The
elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Heinle and Heinle.
Camus, P., & Advani, M. (2021). Preparing
for study abroad: A task-based needs
analysis. Hispania,
104
(3), 375–394.
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European
framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, available
at [URL]
Dai, D. W. (2023). What
do second language speakers really need for real-world interaction? A needs analysis of L2 Chinese interactional
competence. Language Teaching Research.
Delalande, H. (2021). Analyse
des besoins en français de spécialité pour étudiants étrangers en stage professionnel en
France. Language Learning in Higher
Education,
11
(2), 359–373.
Fisher, J. (2020). The
underlying action-oriented and task-based approach of the CEFR and its implementation in language testing and assessment at
university. Language Learning in Higher
Education,
10
(2), 301–316.
Goldberg, E., & Noels, K. A. (2006). Motivation,
ethnic identity, and post-secondary education language choices of graduates of intensive French language
programs. Canadian Modern Language
Review,
62
(3), 423–447.
Hillman, K. K., & Long, M. H. (2020). 8
A Task-based needs analysis for US foreign service officers: The challenge of the Japanese celebration
speech. In Using tasks in second language
teaching (pp. 123–145). Multilingual Matters.
Iizuka, T. (2019). Task-based
needs analysis: Identifying communicative needs for study abroad students in
Japan. System,
80
1, 134–142.
Lambert, C. (2010). A
task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching
Research,
14
(1), 99–112.
Liakina, N., & Michaud, G. (2018). Needs
analyses for task-based curriculum design: How useful can it be for general purpose L2
courses? Nouvelle Revue Synergies
Canada,
11
1, 1–12.
Long, M. H. (2005). Second
language needs analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Long, M. H. (2015). Identifying
target tasks. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second
language acquisition and task-based language
teaching (pp. 117–168). Wiley-Blackwell.
Long, M. H. (2016). In
defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics,
36
1, 5–33.
Mandin, L. (2010). Portfolio
langagier: Les finissants des programmes d’immersion se révèlent. Canadian Journal of Applied
Linguistics,
13
(1), 104–119.
Polio, C., & Montgomery, D. P. (2022). Applying
a communicative competence framework to the study and teaching of second language
writing. In M. Kanwit & M. Solon (Eds.), Communicative
competence in a second language: Theory, method, and
applications (pp. 152–170). Routledge.
Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., & Long, M. H. (2015). Needs
analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English
for Specific
Purposes,
40
1, 11–26.
Serafini, E. J., & Torres, J. (2015). The
utility of needs analysis for nondomain expert instructors in designing task-based Spanish for the professions
curricula. Foreign Language
Annals,
48
(3), 447–472.
Torres, J., & Serafini, E. J. (2016). Microevaluating
learners’ task-specific motivation in a task-based business Spanish
course. Hispania,
99
(2), 289–304.
Wang, H. (2011). Chinese
for business professionals: The workplace needs and business Chinese textbooks. Global Business
Languages,
16
1, 27–41.
West, R. (1994). Needs
analysis in language teaching. Language
Teaching,
27
1, 1–19.
Yasuda, S. (2011). Genre-based
tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing
competence. Journal of Second Language
Writing,
20
(2), 111–133.