Council of Europe
(2001) Commonm European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2017) Functional adequacy in L2 writing. Towards a new rating scale. Language Testing, 34(3), 321–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Assessing functional adequacy of L2 performance in a task-based approach. In N. Taguchi & Y-J. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to assessing pragmatics (pp. 265–286). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., & Gilabert, R.
(2010) Communicative adequacy and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. In I. Bartning, M. Martin & I. Vedder (Eds.) Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research (pp. 81–100). Eurosla Monographs Series 1. Roma: Eurosla.Google Scholar
Loewen, S.
(2020) Introduction to instructed second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S. & Sato, M.
(2021) Exploring the relationship between TBLT and ISLA. TASK: Journal on Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Early View. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., & Wolff, D.
(2016) Peer interaction in F2F and CMC contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 163–184). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D.
(2018) Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field: replication in second language research. Language Learning, 68 (2), 321–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michel, M.
(2017) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 production. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 50–68). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E.
(2016) The effects of complexity, accuracy and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37 (6), 828–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar