Chapter published in:
Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics
Edited by Naoko Taguchi and YouJin Kim
[Task-Based Language Teaching 10] 2018
► pp. 84109
References

References

Austin, J. L.
(1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Mahan-Taylor, R.
(2003) Teaching pragmatics. Washington, DC: US Department of State, Office of English Language Programs.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Clark, H. H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Cohen, A. & Tarone, E.
(1994) The effects of training on written speech act behavior: Stating and changing an opinion. MinneTESOL Journal, 12, 39–62.
Crystal, D.
(1997) The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cutting, J.
(2015) Pragmatics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Routledge.
Dippold, D.
(2011) Argumentative discourse in L2 German: A sociocognitive perspective on the development of facework strategies. Modern Language Journal, 95 , 171–187. Crossref link
Ede, L., & Lunsford, A.
(1990) Singular texts/plural authors. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Fairclough, N.
(2003) Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Gilabert, R., Barón, J., & Llanes, A.
(2009) Manipulating cognitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners’ interaction during oral performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47 , 367–395. Crossref link
Gilabert, R., & Barón, J.
(2013) The impact of increasing task complexity on L2 pragmatic moves. In A. Mackey & K. McDonough (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational settings (pp. 45–69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Gomez-Laich, M. P.
(2017) Effects of task complexity on ESL students’ academic writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C.
(2010) They say. I say. The moves that matter in academic writing. New York, NY: Norton.
Hellermann, J.
(2007) The development of practices for action in classroom dyadic interaction: Focus on task openings. The Modern Language Journal, 91 , 83–96. Crossref link
Huth, T.
(2006) Negotiating structure and culture: L2 learners’ realization of L2 compliment-response sequences in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 38 , 2025–2050. Crossref link
Hyland, K.
(1990) A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21 , 66–78. Crossref link
(1998) Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30 , 437–455. Crossref link
Ifantidou, E.
(2011) Genres and pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 , 327–346. Crossref link
Johnstone, B.
(1989) Linguistic strategies and cultural styles for persuasive discourse. In S. Ting-Toomey & F. Korzenny (Eds.), Language, communication, and culture: Current directions (pp. 139–156). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J.
(2014) Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34 , 1–42. Crossref link
Kim, Y.
(2009) The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37 , 254–268. Crossref link
(2012) Task complexity, learning opportunities, and Korean EFL learners’ question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34 , 627–658. Crossref link
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N.
(2015) Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 99 , 656–677. Crossref link
Linell, P.
(1998) Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Long, M.
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Loewen, S., & Basturkmen, H. L.
(2005) Interaction in group writing tasks in genre-based instruction in an EAP classroom. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 15 , 171–189. Crossref link
Martin, J. R.
(1992) English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Miller, R., Mitchell, T., & Pessoa, S.
(2014) Valued voices: Students’ use of engagement in argumentative history writing. Linguistics and Education, 28 , 107–120. Crossref link
Nuevo, A., Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L.
(2011) Task complexity, modified output, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 175–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Révész, A.
(2011) Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 162–181. Crossref link
Révész, A., Kourtali, N., & Mazgutova, D.
(2016) Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67, 208–241.
Robinson, P.
(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. Crossref link
(2003a) Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
(2003b) The Cognition Hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21, 45–105.
(2007) Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 3, 193–213. Crossref link
(2011a) Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61, 1–36. Crossref link
(2011b) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. Crossref link
Searle, J. R.
(1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Storch, N.
(2013) Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G.
(2007) Writing tasks: Comparing individual and collaborative writing. In M. P. Garcia-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 157–177). London: Multilingual Matters.
Street, B.
(2009) Hidden features of academic paper writing. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 24, 1–17.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. Crossref link
Swales, J. M.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taguchi, N.
(2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48 , 1–50. Crossref link
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
(2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Unger, C.
(2006) Genre, relevance and global coherence: The pragmatics of discourse type. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Crossref link
Wingate, U.
(2012) Argument! Helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11 , 145–154. Crossref link
Zhao, H., & Kaufer, D.
(2013) DocuScope: Analyzing pragmatic competence in second language writing of genres. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 235–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Herraiz-Martinez, Ana & Eva Alcón-Soler
2019. Pragmatic outcomes in the English-medium instruction context. Applied Pragmatics 1:1  pp. 68 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 december 2019. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.