Chapter published in:

Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics
Edited by Naoko Taguchi and YouJin Kim
[Task-Based Language Teaching 10] 2018
► pp. 114–136

Chapter 5. Task modality effects on Spanish learners’ interlanguage pragmatic development

Derek Reagan | Georgetown University

Caroline Payant | Université du Québec à Montréal

Within the field of second language acquisition (SLA), we have witnessed a rise in research on task-based language teaching (TBLT) and its effects on L2 development (Kim, 2015). However, few studies have examined how TBLT could facilitate the development of interlanguage pragmatics (Taguchi & Kim, 2015), an issue which this volume aims to address. Moreover, whether task modality (i.e., oral versus written tasks) mediates development has yet to be investigated. The current study with learners of Spanish focused on the effects of using pedagogical tasks and on the manipulation of task modality on learners’ L2 pragmatic competence through the production of Spanish requests and speech act modifications. Two intermediate classes (n = 25) of Spanish completed either an oral or written story completion task. Drawing on oral and written Discourse Completion Tests, we found that tasks positively impacted learners’ production of L2 requests. However, significant differences between modality groupings were not identified.

Published online: 15 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.05rea

References

Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L.

(2008) Does writing inﬂuence learner attention to form? In D. D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 243–266). Ann Arbor, IN: University of Michigan Press.

Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M.

(2010) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research 15, 35–59.

(2011) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 35–59.

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G.

(1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Bygate, M.

(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Task-based learning: Language teaching, learning, and assessment (pp. 23–48). London: Longman.

(Ed.) (2015) Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Child, L., & Hurst, B.

(2011) Look after your planet. London: Puffin Books.

Ellis, R.

(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Félix-Brasdefer, J. C.

(2005) Indirectness and politeness in Mexican requests. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 66–78). Somereville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Félix-Brasdefer, J. C.

(2008) Pedagogical intervention and the development of pragmatic competence in learning Spanish as a foreign language. Issues in Applied Linguistics 16, 49–84.

Flores Salgado, E.

(2011) The pragmatics of requests and apologies developmental patterns of Mexican students. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gass, S., & Mackey, A.

(2007) Input, interaction and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175–200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

(2015) Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction, (pp. 180–206). London: Routledge.

Gilabert, R., Barón, J., & Llanes, À.

(2009) Manipulating cognitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners’ interaction during oral performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(3–4), 367–395.

Gilabert, R., Manchón, R., & Vasylets, O.

(2016) Mode in theoretical and empirical TBLT research: Advancing research agendas. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 117–135.

Golato, A.

(2003) Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 90–121.

Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T.

(2006) Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165–211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kasper, G.

(1996) Introduction: Interlanguage pragmatics in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(02), 145–148.

(2001) Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 33–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R.

(2002) Pragmatic development in a second language. Language Learning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies, 52(1), 1–352.

Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R.

(1996) Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(02), 149–169.

Kim, Y.

(2013) Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean EFL Context. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational Contexts (pp. 3–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kim, Y., & Payant, C.

(2014) A pedagogical proposal for task sequencing: An exploration of task repetition and task complexity on learning opportunities. In M. Baralt, R. Gilabert, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp. 151–177). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Kim, Y.

(2015) The role of tasks as vehicles for learning in classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 163–181). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N.

(2015) Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 656–677.

Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N.

(2013) The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41(3), 829–840.

Koike, D. A., & Pearson, L.

(2005) The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33(3), 481–501.

Kormos, J.

(2014) Differences across modality of performance: An investigation of linguistic and discourse complexity in narrative tasks. In H. Byrnes & R. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based L2 language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 193–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kormos, J., & Trebits, A.

(2012) The role of task complexity, modality, and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62(2), 439–472.

Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.

(2011) Task performance and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking: The effect of mode. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 91–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Langer, B. D.

(2013) Teaching requests to L2 learners of Spanish. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(6), 1147–1159.

Loewen, S.

(2015) Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.

Lynch, T. & Maclean, J.

(2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 221–250.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M.

(2005) Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Márquez, R. R.

(2000) Linguistic politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A contrastive study of requests and apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Newton, J.

(2013) Incidental vocabulary learning in classroom communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 17(2), 164–187.

Niu, R.

(2009) Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 384–402.

Payant, C., & Kim, Y.

(2015) Language mediation in an L3 classroom: The role of task modalities and task types. Foreign Language Annals 48, 706–729.

Payant, C. & Reagan, D.

(2018) Manipulating task implementation variables with incipient Spanish language learners: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 169–188.

Pinter, A.

(2005) Task repetition with 10-year-old children. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp. 113–126). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

(2007a) Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practicing with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 189–207.

(2007b) What children say: Benefits of task repetition. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 131–158). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

Plonksy, L., & Kim, Y.

(2016) Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 73–97.

Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A.

(2006) The impact of planning time on children’s task-based interactions. System 34 547–565.

Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Mackey, A.

(2011) Task complexity, uptake of recasts, and second language development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Researching task complexity: Task demands, task-based language learning and performance (pp. 203–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Robinson, P.

(2011) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Rose, K. R.

(2005) On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33(3), 385–399.

Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.

(2008) Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sample, E., & Michel, M.

(2015) An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 31, 23–46.

Swain, M.

(2005) The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.

(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337.

Sykes, J.

(2009) Learner request in Spanish: Examining the potential of multiuser virtual environments for L2 pragmatics acquisition. In L. Lomika & G. Lord (eds.), The Second Generation: Online collaboration and social networking in CALL 2009 (CALICO Monograph). San Marcos: TX, 199–234.

(2013) Multiuser virtual environments: Learner apologies in Spanish. In N. Taguchi & J. Sykes (eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 71–100.

Taguchi, N.

(2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. State-of-the-art article. Language Teaching 48 1–50.

Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y.

(2016) Collaborative dialogue in learning pragmatics: Pragmatics-related episodes as an opportunity for learning request-making. Applied Linguistics, 37, 416–437.

Takahashi, S.

(2001) Explicit and implicit instruction of L2 complex request forms. In P. Robinson, M. Sawyer, & S. Ross (Eds.), Second language acquisition research in Japan (pp. 73–100). Japan: The Japan Association for Language Teaching.

(2010) Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Pragmatics across languages and cultures (pp. 391–421). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Van den Branden, K.

(Ed.) (2006) Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(2016) Task-based language teaching. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp.238–251). London: Routledge.

Williams, J.

(2012) The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 321–331.