Chapter published in:
Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics
Edited by Naoko Taguchi and YouJin Kim
[Task-Based Language Teaching 10] 2018
► pp. 138157
References

References

Alcón, E.
(2005) Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System 33(3), 417–435. Crossref link
Aston, G.
(1995) Say ‘thank you’: some pragmatic constraints in conversational closings. Applied Linguistics, 16, 57–86. Crossref link
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
(1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., & Robinson, P.
(Eds.) (2014) Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury.
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(1999) Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: a research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49, 677–713. Crossref link
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, T.
(2011) Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 347–384. Crossref link
Bergman, M. L., & Kasper, G.
(1993) Perception and performance in native and nonnative apology. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 82–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E.
(1984) Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196–212. Crossref link
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G.
(Eds.) (1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Celaya, M. L., & Barón, J.
(2015) The interface between grammar and pragmatics in EFL measurement and development. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 181–203.
Cohen, A.
(1994) Assessing language ability in the classroom. Rowley, MS: Newbury House.
Cohen, A., & Olshtain, E.
(1994) Researching the production of second-language speech acts. In E. E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 143–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Colston, H. L.
(2002) Pragmatic justifications for nonliteral gratitude acknowledgements: Oh sure, any time. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 205–226. Crossref link
Coulmas, F.
(1981) “Poison to your soul”: Thanks and apologies contrastively viewed. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech (pp. 69–91). The Hague: Mouton.
Council of Europe E.C.
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P.
(2003) Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M.
(2011) “Please answer me as soon as possible”: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3193–3215. Crossref link
Foster, P., & Skehan, P.
(2008) The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3(3), 215–247. Crossref link
Gilabert, R.
(2005) Task complexity and L2 oral narrative production. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Barcelona.
Gilabert, R., Manchón, R., & Vasylets, O.
(2016) Mode in theoretical and empirical TBLT research: advancing research agendas. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 117–135.
Hickey, L.
(1991) Comparatively polite people in Spain and Britain. Association for Contemporary Iberian Studies, 4, 2–6.
Holmes, J.
(1993) New Zealand women are good to talk to: An analysis of politeness strategies in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 20(2), 91–116. Crossref link
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(Eds.) (2012) Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R.
(1999) Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 81–104. Crossref link
(2002) Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N.
(2015) Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 99, 656–677. Crossref link
(2016) Learner-learner interaction during collaborative pragmatic tasks: The role of cognitive and pragmatic task demands. Foreign Language Annals, 49, 42–57.
King, B. W., & Holmes, J.
(2014) Gender and pragmatics. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (1–6). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. Crossref link
Kuiken, F., Mos, M. & Vedder, I.
(2005) Cognitive task complexity and second language written performance. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. P. García-Mayo, & J. Cenoz (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook (Vol. 5) (pp. 195–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2007a) Cognitive task complexity and linguistics performance in French L2 writing. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp.117–135). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(2007b) Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 48–60. Crossref link
Lakoff, R.
(1975) Language and woman’s place. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Levkina, M., & Gilabert, R.
(2014) Task sequencing in the L2 development of spatial expressions. In M. Baralt, R. Gilabert, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp. 37–71). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Lambert, C., & Robinson, P.
(2014) Learning to perform narrative tasks: A semester-long classroom study of L2 task sequencing effects. In M. Baralt, R. Gilabert, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp. 207–230). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Long, M. H.
(1985) A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language training. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Malicka, A., & Levkina, M.
(2012) Measuring task complexity. Does EFL proficiency matter? In A. Shehadeh & C. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts. Research and implementation (pp. 43–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Martínez-Flor, A., & Fukuya, Y. J.
(2005) The effects of instruction on learner’s production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System, 33(3), 463–480. Crossref link
Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2007) The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 241–259. Crossref link
North, B.
(2000) The development of a common framework scale of language proficiency. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Nunan, D.
(2004) Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. D.
(1983) Apology: A speech-act set. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 18–35). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
(1990) The learning of complex speech act behavior. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 45–65.
Ortega, L.
(2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518. Crossref link
Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Hama, M.
(2014) The effects of task complexity and input frequency on the acquisition of the past counterfactual construction through recasts. Language Learning, 64, 615–650. Crossref link
Robinson, P.
(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57. Crossref link
(2010) Situating and distributing cognition across task demands: The SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Putz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition: Inside the learner’s mind (pp. 243–268). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Roever, C.
(2009) Teaching and testing pragmatics. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 560–577). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Crossref link
Rose, K. R.
(1992) Speech acts and questionnaires: The effect of hearer response. Journal of Pragmatics, 17(1), 49–62. Crossref link
(2000) An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 27–67. Crossref link
(2005) On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33(3), 385–399. Crossref link
Rose, K. R., & Ng, C.
(2001) Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliments responses. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 145–170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Safont, M. P.
(2003) Instructional effects on the use of request acts modification devices by EFL learners. In A. Martínerz-Flor, E. Usó Juan, & A. Fernández Guerra (Eds.), Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching (pp. 211–232). Castellón de la Plana, Spain: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
Schmidt, R.
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R.
(1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Skehan, P.
(2008) Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 275–298. Crossref link
Spada, N.
(1986) The interaction between types of contact and types on instruction: Some effects on the second language proficiency of adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8(2), 181–199. Crossref link
Taguchi, N.
(2006) Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in L2 English. Pragmatics, 16, 513–535. Crossref link
(2007) Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics, 28, 113–135. Crossref link
(2011) Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. Crossref link
(2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. State-of-the-art article. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50. Crossref link
Takahashi, S.
(2005) Pragmalinguistic awareness: Is it related to motivation and proficiency? Applied Linguistics, 26, 90–120. Crossref link
(2010) Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Pragmatics across languages and cultures (Handbooks of pragmatics, Vol. 7, pp. 391–421). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
(2013) Awareness and learning in second language pragmatics. Language, Culture and Communication, 5, 53–76.
Takimoto, M.
(2008) The effect of deductive and inductive instruction on the development of language learners’ pragmatic Competence. The Modern Language Journal, 92(3), 369–386. Crossref link
Trosborg, A.
(1995) Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints and apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Trosborg, A., & Shaw, P.
(2008) Deductive and inductive methods in the teaching of business pragmatics: Not an ‘either/or’! In R. Geluykens & B. Kraft (Eds.), Institutional discourse in cross-cultural contexts (pp. 193–220). Munich: Lincom.
Watts, R.
(2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Winke, P. M.
(2007) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(1), 143–144. Crossref link
Xiao, F.
(2015) Proficiency effect on L2 pragmatic competence. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 557–581. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Fakher Ajabshir, Zahra
2020. The relative efficacy of input enhancement, input flooding, and output-based instructional approaches in the acquisition of L2 request modifiers. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216881989665 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 february 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.