Chapter published in:
Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics
Edited by Naoko Taguchi and YouJin Kim
[Task-Based Language Teaching 10] 2018
► pp. 192214
References

References

Alcón Soler, E.
(2002) Relationship between teacher-led versus learners’ interaction and the development of pragmatics in the EFL classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 359–377. Crossref link
Adams, R., & Alwi, N. A. N. M.
(2014) Prior knowledge and second language task production in text chat. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 51–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Azkarai, A.
(2015) Males and females in EFL task-based interaction: Does gender have an impact on LREs? Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 9–35.
Baralt, M.
(2013) The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 689–725. Crossref link
(2014) Task complexity and task sequencing in traditional versus online language classes. In M. Baralt, R. Gilabert, & P. J. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp. 59–122). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Belz, J. A.
(2005) Intercultural questioning, discovery and tension in internet-mediated language learning partnerships. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5, 1–37. Crossref link
Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C.
(2002) The Cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 189–214. Crossref link
(2003) Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53, 591. Crossref link
Blattner, G., & Fiori, M.
(2011) Virtual social network communities: An investigation of language learners’ development of sociopragmatic awareness and multiliteracy skills. CALICO Journal, 29, 24–43. Crossref link
Breen, M.
(1989) The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In R. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Byram, M.
(1997) Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Canto, S., de Graff, R., & Jauregui, K.
(2014) Collaborative tasks for negotiation of intercultural meaning in virtual worlds and video-web communication. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 183–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chapelle, C. A.
(2014) Afterword: Technology-mediated TBLT and the evolving role of the innovator. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 323–334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Çiftçi, E. Y.
(2016) A review of research on intercultural learning through computer-based digital technologies. Educational Technology & Society, 19, 313–327.
Collentine, K.
(2010) Measuring complexity in task-based synchronous computer-mediated communication. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology (pp. 105–128). London: Continuum.
(2013) Using tracking technologies to study the effects of linguistic complexity in CALL input and SCMC output. CALICO Journal, 30, 46–65.
Cunningham, D. J.
(2016) Request modification in synchronous computer-mediated communication: The role of focused instruction. Modern Language Journal, 100, 484–507. Crossref link
Ellis, R.
(2009) Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246. Crossref link
Frenz-Belkin, P.
(2015) ‘Teacher! You need to give me back my homework:’ Assessing students’ needs for a pragmatics curriculum in an academic ESL program. In S. Gesuato, F. Bianchi, & W. Cheng (Eds.), Teaching, learning and investigating pragmatics: Principles, methods and practices (pp. 33–56). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Gass, S., & Varonis, E. M.
(1984) The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34, 65–87. Crossref link
Gibbs, R. W.
(2001) Intentions as emergent products of social interactions. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 105–124). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gilabert, R., & Barón, J.
(2018) Independently measuring cognitive complexity for task sequencing and interlanguage pragmatics development. In N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) Crossref link
Golato, A., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C.
(2006) Negotiation of face in chats. Multilingua, 25, 293–322. Crossref link
González-Lloret, M.
(2008) Computer-mediated learning of L2 pragmatics. In E. A. Soler & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 114–132). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(2011) Conversation analysis of computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 28, 308–325. Crossref link
(2014) The need for needs analysis in technology-mediated TBLT. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 23–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L.
(Eds.) (2014) Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hassall, T.
(2015) Individual variation in L2 study-abroad outcomes: A case study from Indonesian pragmatics. Multilingua, 34, 33–59.
Hertel, K.
(2015) Integrating American English pragmatic instruction in tourism training programs in Latin America: A materials portfolio (MA). University of Oregon. Retrieved from http://​linguistics​.uoregon​.edu​/wp​-content​/uploads​/2015​/09​/Hertel​-Kelsey​-Aug​-15​.pdf
Holden, C., & Sykes, J. M.
(2012) Mentira: Prototyping language-based locative gameplay. In S. Dikkers, J. Martin, & B. Coulter (Eds.), Mobile media learning: Amazing uses of mobile devices for teaching and learning (pp. 111–131). Pittsburg, PA: ETC Press.
Ishihara, N., & Tarone, E.
(2009) Subjectivity and pragmatic choice in L2 Japanese: Emulating and resisting pragmatic norms. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence in Japanese as a second language (pp. 101–128). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Itō, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., & Antin, J.
(Eds.) (2010) Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jauregi, K., & Canto, S.
(in press). Mundos virtuales en la enseñanza de lenguas: Hacia un aprendizaje significativo a través de la interacción, la acción y el juego. In M. González-Lloret & M. Vinagre Eds. Comunicación mediada por tecnologías: Aprendizaje y enseñanza de la lengua extranjera. Sheffield: Equinox.
Jauregi, K., Canto, S., de Graaff, R., Koenraad, T., & Moonen, M.
(2011) Verbal interaction in Second Life: Towards a pedagogic framework for task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 77–101. Crossref link
Jefferson, G.
(1988) On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35, 418–441. Crossref link
Jenks, C. J., & Brandt, A.
(2013) Managing mutual orientation in the absence of physical copresence: Multiparty voice-based chat room interaction. Discourse Processes, 50, 227–248. Crossref link
Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T.
(2006) Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165–211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Kasper, G.
(1997) Can pragmatic competence be taught? (NetWork #6) Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai ’I, Retrieved August 20 2004, from http://​www​.nflrc​.hawaii​.edu​/NetWorks​/NW06/.
(2009) L2 pragmatic development. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 259–284). Bingley: Emerald.
Kim, E. -Y., & Brown, L.
(2014) Negotiating pragmatic competence in computer mediated communication: The case of Korean address terms. CALICO, 31, 264–284 Crossref link
Kim, H. Y.
(2014) Learner investment, identity, and resistance to second language pragmatic norms. System, 45, 92–102. Crossref link
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N.
(2016) Learner-learner interaction during collaborative pragmatic tasks: The role of cognitive and pragmatic task demands. Foreign Language Annals, 49, 42–57. Crossref link
Kinginger, C., & Belz, J. A.
(2005) Sociocultural perspectives on pragmatic development in foreign language learning: Case studies from telecollaboration and study abroad. Interlanguage Pragmatics, 2, 369–421.
Lakoff, R.
(1973) The logic of politeness; or, minding your P’s and Q’s. In C. Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark, & A. Weiser (Eds.), Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (pp. 292–305). Chicago, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.
Long, M. H.
(2016) In defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5–33.
Markee, N.
(2013) Emic and etic in qualitative research. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Crossref link
Marsh, L., & Onof, C.
(2008) Stigmergic epistemology, stigmergic cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1–2), 136–149. Crossref link
Nik, A. N. M. A., Adams, R., & Newton, J.
(2012) Writing to learn via text chat: Task implementation and focus on form. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 23–39. Crossref link
Norris, J. M.
(2009) Task-based teaching and testing. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Crossref link
O’Dowd, R., & Ware, P.
(2009) Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 173–188. Crossref link
Ortega, L., & González-Lloret, M.
(2015) Staking out the territory of technology-mediated TBLT. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 59–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E.
(2015) The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 233–268). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Piirainen-Marsh, A.
(2011) Enacting interactional competence in gaming activities: Coproducing talk with virtual others. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. P. Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 19–44). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Piirainen-Marsh, A. P., & Tainio, L.
(2009) Other-repetition as a resource for participation in the activity of playing a video game. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 153–169. Crossref link
(2014) Asymmetries of knowledge and epistemic change in social gaming interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 1022–1038. Crossref link
Robinson, P.
(2011) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Researching task complexity: Task demands, task-based language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roever, C.
(2011) Testing of second language pragmatics: Past and future. Language Testing, 28, 463–481. Crossref link
(2013) Technology and tests of L2 pragmatics. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 215–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Rose, K. R.
(2005) On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33, 385–399. Crossref link
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.
(2008) Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schegloff, E.
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Siegal, M.
(1996) The role of learner subjectivity in second language linguistic competency: Western women learning Japanese. Applied Linguistics, 17, 356–382. Crossref link
Skehan, P.
(2003) Focus on form, tasks, and technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 391–411. Crossref link
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Jiang, W.
(2003) Explaining cross-cultural pragmatic findings: Moving from politeness maxims to sociopragmatic interactional principles (SIPs). Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10–11), 1633–1650. Crossref link
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986/2001) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stommel, W.
(2008) Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. Language at Internet, 5. Retrieved from http://​www​.languageatinternet​.de​/articles​/2008​/1537
Sykes, J.
(2008) A dynamic approach to social interaction: Synthetic immersive environments & spanish pragmatics. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Sykes, J. M.
(2014) TBLT and synthetic immersive environments: What can in-game task restarts tell us about design and implementation? In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 149–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Taguchi, N., Kaufer, D., Gómez-Laich, M. P., & Zhao, H.
(2016) A corpus linguistics analysis of on‑line peer commentary. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & J. C. Félix-Brasdefer (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 357–370). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Thomas, J.
(1983) Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–112. Crossref link
Thorne, S. L.
(2003) Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67.
(2016) Cultures-of-use and morphologies of communicative action. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 185–191.
Timpe-Laughlin, V.
(2018) FINAL TITLE. In N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) Crossref link
Tsai, M. -H., & Kinginger, C.
(2014) Giving and receiving advice in computer-mediated peer response activities. CALICO Journal, 32, 82–112.
Van den Branden, K.
(2016) The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 164–181.
Vinagre, M.
(2010) Intercultural learning in asynchronous telecollaborative exchanges: A case study. The Eurocall Review, 17. Available at: http://​www​.eurocall​-languages​.org​/uploaded​/EUROCALL​_Review​/review17​.pdf.
Walther, J. B., Van der Heide, B., Ramirez, A., Burgoon, J. K., & Peña, J.
(2015) Interpersonal and hyperpersonal dimensions of computer-mediated communication. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 3–22). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Youn, S. J.
(2015) Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32, 199–225. Crossref link
(2018) Task design and validity evidence for assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction. In N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) Crossref link
Ziegler, N.
(2016) Taking Technology to Task: Technology-Mediated TBLT, Performance, and Production. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 136–163. Crossref link